Criminal-legal Mechanism of Counteraction of Insider Activity in the Stock Market
Abstract
Protecting the rights of stock market participants in the modern world is an important aspect of its functioning, ensuring the security of investments of participants and their property status. The misuse of insider information with the aim of obtaining certain benefits, and market manipulation are some of the most ambitious crimes that violate the rights of a wide range of people, and a direct threat to their material well-being. Insider trading involves trading transactions with securities, which is carried out by private individuals, holding information about the Issuer of the financial asset.
In this work, we use methods of legal statistics that allow us to obtain quantitative data on the application of liability for violations of anti-insider Russian legislation. In addition, a comparative legal method is used to comparatively characterize measures to combat insider activity in the world.
The purpose of the research is to identify the shortcomings of the modern criminal law mechanism for countering insider activity in the Russian securities market and develop measures to improve its effectiveness. The criminal law regulation of insider information in the world and domestic experience are analyzed.
As a result of the study, a number of shortcomings inherent in this mechanism were identified. Thus, the study of foreign practice has shown that the existing measures in Russia to combat insiders in the securities market are not effective. This is due to many factors, the main of which are the imperfection of the legal framework, the lack of practical application of criminal penalties, their low effectiveness, the lack of specific penalties, etc. The article highlights the problems of administrative and criminal liability for market manipulation and illegal use of insider information. The article analyzes the criminal law regulation of mitigating liability for insider information in the world and domestic experience.Based on the analysis and comparison of Russian and international practices in the fight against insiders, conclusions are drawn about the need to adjust the domestic monitoring mechanism and improve criminal law methods to ensure its functioning.The article actualizes the problems of administrative and criminal liability for the manipulation of the market and the misuse of insider information.
References
[2] Ananyeva, A.V. 2007. State-legal regulation of corporate securities market in order to strengthen the economic security of Russia. PhD diss., Moscow, 29.
[3] Belomyttseva, O.S., Cupis, I.P. 2016. Organization to counteract the use of insider information and market manipulation in the Russian Federation. Business.Education. Right.Bulletin of the Volgograd Institute of business, 3 (36), 238-244.
[4] Binham, C. 2016. UK regulator in spot light as insider trading case begins. Financial Times.
[5] Chirkova, E.V., Aghamyan, G.R. 2015. Insider trading on the Russian stock market before the announcements of mergers and acquisitions. Economic journal HSE, 19, 3, 395-422.
[6] Chan H., Chan R., Ho K. 2013. Enforcement of Insider Trading Law in Hong Kong: What Insights Can We Learn from Recent Convictions? Australian Journal of Corporate Law, 28, 3, 271-303.
[7] Emelyanova, E.A. 2013. Legal consequences of such manipulation in the markets. Saint-Petersburg, 25.
[8] Emelyanova, E.A. 2014. Problems of administrative and criminal liability for market manipulation and inequitable use of insider information Bulletin. Scientific library Cyberleninka. Saint-Petersburg, 1, 40-49.
[9] Hopt, K.J. 1991. The European Insider Dealing Directive. Hopt and Wymeersch, 131-132.
[10] Kalashnikova, N.I. 2012. Modern aspects of economic policy analysis. Publishing center Science 246.
[11] Khudyakova, L.C. 2011. International experience of dealing with manipulative trades in the financial markets. Money and credit, 7, 65-70.
[12] King, M., Roell, A. 1988. Insider trading. Economic Policy, 6 (1), 855-869.
[13] Manne, H.G. 2005. Insider Trading: Hayek, Virtual Markets and the Dog that Did Not Bark. Journal of Corporation Law, 31, 1, 167-185.
[14] Podolniy, N.A., Podolnaya N.N. 2016. Corporate corruption: the substantiation of the problem. Russian Journal of Criminology, 10, 3, 521–530.
[15] Savchuk, I.A., Medvedev, G.T. 2016. Insider trading.Universum: Economics and law: electron. scientific. Journal, 9(30).
[16] Schörner, P. 1990. Gesetzliches Insiderhandelsverbot: eine ordnungs politische Analyse, Wiesbaden.zugl. Diss., Bochum.
[17] Sereda, A.V. 2014. Liability for use of insider information. Scientific notes of young scientists, 1, 46-48.
[18] Scanell K., Foley, S. 2013. SAC to pay the largest insider fine of $ 1.8bn. Financial Times.
[19] Silin E. 2012. Adoption of the law oninsider - a formality or a requirement of time? Internal control in a credit institution, 24, 1, 24-35.
[20] Starshinin, S.A. 2010. Improving the regulation of the Russian securities market as a factor in ensuring its economic security. Moscow, 160.
[21] Williams, W. 2003. Insider trading and asymmetric information. Capitalism magazine,
[22] Zubkov, I. 2016. Pyramid will test the strength. The Russian newspaper, Federal issue, 6935 (67).
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.