Activity of the European Court of Human Rights and Its Impact on Ukraine's Criminal Justice Policy
Abstract
The relevance of the study is due to the fact that one of the main directions of Ukraine's domestic policy is ensuring the rights and freedoms of citizens through national and international mechanisms for their protection. In this context, the article aims to analyze the activities of the European Court of Human Rights as an effective international mechanism for the protection of human rights and freedoms and its impact on the criminal law of Ukraine as an integral part of crime prevention policy. Leading approach to the study of this problem is the method of generalization of legal theory and practice that has afforded revealing impact of the activities of the European Court of Human Rights on the criminal law of Ukraine. The materials of the paper imply the practical significance for the university teachers of the legal specializations.
References
[2] “Akopyan v. Ukraine’: Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 5 June 2014. http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_a13.
[3] Bessarabov, V.G. 2003. European Court of Human Rights. Yurlitinform.
[4] Constitution of Ukraine: the law of Ukraine vid 28 hearts. 1996. No. 254k / 96 – BP. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр/ed19960628.
[5] Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 4 November 1950. No. 995_004. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004/print.
[6] Dyuryagin, I.Ya. 1989. Citizen and Law. Yuridicheskayaliteratura.
[7] Fris, P.L., and Kharchenko, V.B. (Ed.). 2016. Crime Policy in Ukraine: Theoretical and Applied Problems. Nauka.
[8] “Gorshkov v. Ukraine’: Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 8 November 2005. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_090.
[9] “Kocheruk v. Ukraine’: Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 6 September 2007. http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_839.
[10] “M. v. Ukraine’: Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 19 April 2012. http://document.ua/sprava-m.-proti-ukrayini-doc110090.html.
[11] “Melnik v. Ukraine’: Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 28 March 2006. http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_037.
[12] “Mikulic v. Croatia’: Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 7 February. 2002. http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/980_049.
[13] On the Enforcement of Judgments and the Practice of the European Court of Human Rights: Law of Ukraine of 23 February 2006. No. 3477-IV. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3477-15.
[14] “Phillips v. The United Kingdom: Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 5 July 2001’ http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/980_052.
[15] “Pritti v. The United Kingdom’: Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 29 April. 2002. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/980_210.
[16] “Raymondo v. Italy’: Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 22 February. 1994. http://europeancourt.ru/resheniya-evropejskogo-suda-na-russkom-yazyke/rajmondo-protiv-italii-raimondo-v-italy-postanovlenie-evropejskogo-suda.
[17] Ratification of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950, the First Protocol and Protocols Nos. 2, 4, 7 and 11 to the Convention: Law of Ukraine of 17 July. 1997, No. 475/97-ВР. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/475/97-вр.
[18] The European Court of Human Rights – Ukrinform. http://ukrinform.ua/rubric-world/2626535-minulogo-roku-najbilse-porusen-prav-ludini-bulo-u-rosii-zvit-espl.html.
[19] Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 10 December 1948, No. 995_015. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_015.
[20] “Warbanov v. Bulgaria’: Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 5 October 2000. http://search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/SO2365.html.
[21] “Winterwerp v The Netherlands’: Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 24 October 1979. http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/980_155.
[22] “Y.F. v. Turkey’: Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 22 October. 2003. https://rm.coe.int/090000168071ffd0.
[23] “Yakovenko v. Ukraine’: Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 25 October 2007. http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_438.
[24] “Z. v. Finland’: Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 25 February 1997. http://medicallaw.org.ua/biblioteka/mizhnarodna-sudova-praktika/z-proti-finljandiji-st-8-konvenciji-pravo-na-povagu-do-privatnogo-ta-simeinogo-zhittja.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.