Specifics of Receiving Evidence in the Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Abstract
The research discusses the specifics of receiving evidence in the criminal procedure of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The authors of the article analyze the criminal procedure legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan related to receiving evidence during the pre-trial investigation of a criminal case. Having conducted a scientific analysis, they have determined the main features of receiving evidence in the criminal procedure. The study has revealed the main types of evidence and provided their characteristics. The authors have considered the procedural order of investigative actions that are based on receiving evidence (interrogation, face-to-face confrontation, presentation for identification, evidence verification and clarification at the scene, investigative experiment). According to the study results, the authors have concluded that the effectiveness of receiving evidence during the pre-trial investigation of a criminal case consists of many objective and subjective factors but the main ones are strict adherence to the corresponding law and professional skills of the official investigating the crime in question.
References
[2] Bakhin, V.P. 1997. Politseiskii dopros [Police interrogation]. Almaty: Baspa, 134 pp.
[3] Bakhin, V., Kogamov, M., and Karpov, N. 2004. Dopros na predvaritelnom sledstvii: ugolovno-protsessualnye i kriminalisticheskie voprosy [Interrogation during pre-trial investigation: criminal procedure and criminalistics issues]. The 2nd edition. Almaty: Zhety Zhargy, 192 pp.
[4] Belkin, R.S. 1993. Ocherki kriminalisticheskoi taktiki [Reviews of criminalistics strategies]. Volgograd: Publishing House of the Higher Investigative School of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, 200 pp.
[5] Dospulov, G.G. 1996. Psikhologiya doprosa v ugolovnom protsesse [The psychology of interrogation in criminal proceedings]. Almaty: Gylym, 224 pp.
[6] Ginzburg, A.Ya. 2008. Dopros i proverka pokazanii: ugolovno-protsessualnye i kriminalisticheskie voprosy [Interrogation and evidence validation: criminal procedure and criminalistics issues]. Almaty: Yurist, 208 pp.
[7] Ginzburg, A.Ya., and Kogamov, M.Ch. 2005. Osnovy taktiki oprosa grazhdan v operativno-rozysknoi i ugolovno-protsessualnoi deyatelnosti po zakonodatelstvu Respubliki Kazakhstan [The basic tactics of interrogating citizens in operative-investigative and criminal procedure actions in conformity with the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Astana, 140 pp.
[8] Kalnitskii, V.V. 2003. Sledstvennye deistviya [Interrogative actions]. Omsk: OmskayaAkademiya MVD Rossii, 272 pp.
[9] Kan, A.G. 2016. Dopros v dosudebnom rassledovanii ugolovnogo dela [Interrogation in the pre-trial investigation of a criminal case]. Almaty: Қазақуниверситеті, 142 pp.
[10] Konstitutsiya Respubliki Kazakhstan [The Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. 1995. Almaty: Zhetyzhargy, 16 pp.
[11] Linovskii, V.A. 2001. Opyt istoricheskikh rozyskanii o sledstvennom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve v Rossii [The historical development of criminal and investigative activities in the Russian legal system]. Moscow: LeksEst, 212 pp.
[12] Lukashevich, V.G. 1989. Taktika obshcheniya sledovatelya s uchastnikami otdelnykh sledstvennykh deistvii [Communication tactics between the investigator and other participants in investigative actions]. Kiev: Publishing House of the Kiev Higher School of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR, 187 pp.
[13] Ospanov, S.D. 2004. Dosudebnoe proizvodstvo v ugolovnom protsesse Respubliki Kazakhstan [Pre-trial proceedings in the criminal procedure of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Almaty. 40 pp.
[14] Pobedkin, A.V. 1998. Pokazaniya obvinyaemogo v ugolovnom protsesse [Evidence provided by the accused in criminal proceedings]. Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences, Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow, 206 pp.
[15] Porubov, N.I. 1973. Dopros v sovetskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Interrogation in the Soviet criminal procedure]. The 2nd enlarged and revised edition. Minsk: iz-vo ‘Vysheishayashkola’, 368 pp.
[16] Sheifer, S.A. 2001. Sledstvennye deistviya. Sistema i protsessualnaya forma [Investigative actions. Their system and procedural form]. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 208 pp.
[17] Ugolovno-protsessualnyi kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan [The Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. 2015. Almaty,356 pp.
[18] Yakub, M.L. 1968. Pokazaniya svidetelei i poterpevshikh [The evidence of witnesses and victims]. Moscow, Moscow University Publishing House, 128 pp.
[19] Zakatov, A.A. 1984. Lozhiborba s nei [Lie and its counteraction]. Volgograd: Nizhne-Volzhskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 192 pp.
[20] Zorin, G.A. 2001. Rukovodstvo po taktike doprosa [Guidelines for conducting interrogation]. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 320 pp.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.