Problems of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)

  • Taewook KANG School of Law, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russian Federation

Abstract

The research deals with Problems of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) focused on Investment Arbitration. The author especially focuses on the problems under BIT (Bilateral Investment Treaties) and FTA (Free Trade Agreements. Mentioned in this article, International investment disputes are generated due to host countries and foreign investors. ISDS is Dispute settlements between investors and countries. This is not suit proceedings but arbitration proceedings. That is, ‘activities of the third party to arbitrate and settle disputes by intervening between parties in dispute. ’However, Dispute Settlement through this way, is it really reasonable and fair system? If it is indeed fair and reasonable system, advanced countries like the United States and Australia would not have abandoned it. Therefore, the investment arbitration system is never a dispute settlement proceeding that has been verified and stabilized internationally.


 

References

[1] Bolivia declared withdrawal from the ICSID Convention. http://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1076.
[2] Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. New York Convention. 1958. http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/NY-conv/New-York-Convention-E.pdf.
[3] Gerdy, K.B. 2000. What is the Difference between Substantive and Procedural Law? Temple University.
[4] ICSID Convention. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. 1965. https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/icsiddocs/Pages/ICSID-Convention.aspx.
[5] Nikiema, S.H. 2012. Best Practices Indirect Expropriation. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2012/best_practice_indirect_expropriation.pdf.
[6] Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City, 438 U.S. 104, 57 L. Ed. 2d 631, 98 S. Ct. 2646, 1977. https://law.resource.org/pub/us/case/reporter/US/438/438.US.104.77-444.html.
[7] South Korea-U.S. FTA (U.S. – Korea Free Trade Agreement). https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/korus-fta; http://www.fta.go.kr/webmodule/_PSD_FTA/us/doc/us_Fulltext_eng.pdf.
[8] UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. (as revised in 2010). http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules-revised/arb-rules-revised-2010-e.pdf.
[9] Karas, M. 2019. ISDS Regimes and Democratic Practice: Creating Conflict of Interests between Governments, Investors and Local Populations. Croatian International Relations Review 25(84), 36-52.
[10] Butler, N. 2019. Non-Disputing Party Participation in ICSID Disputes: Faux Amici? Netherlands International Law Review 66(1), 143-178.
[11] Nichols, S. 2019. Transnational Capital and the Transformation of the State: Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). Critical Sociology 45(1), 137-157.
[12] Nichols, S. 2018. Expanding property rights under investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS): class struggle in the era of transnational capital. Review of International Political Economy 25(2), 243-269.
[13] Glinavos, I. 2018. Brexit, the city and options for ISDS. ICSID Review 33(2), 380-405.
[14] Chen, W.S.E., Huang, C.F., and Huang, M.J. 2018. ISDS: a self-configurable software-defined storage system for enterprise. Enterprise Information Systems 12(1), 54-75.
[15] Jansen, C.N. 2017. The challenge of establishing a multilateral investment tribunal at ICSID. ICSID Review 32(3), 611-624.
Published
2020-03-31
How to Cite
KANG, Taewook. Problems of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS). Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 2, p. 561 – 564, mar. 2020. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/4615>. Date accessed: 02 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v10.2(40).16.