Assessment of the Social Infrastructure of the University as a Factor of its International Competitiveness
Abstract
It is noted in the article that new principles of educational activities suppose interaction dynamics of all university structures, and at the same time, the social infrastructure plays an important role, as it is the main factor in increasing international competitiveness of the university. The main objective of the study is to identify factors of international competitiveness of universities and to determine a role of the social infrastructure among these factors, prove that a degree of importance of the social infrastructure elements of universities depends on the target audience composition of students. Within the framework of this study main factors of international competitiveness of universities were identified: qualification level of academic teaching staff, integration level of the university into international educational space, development level of material and technical base, which provides the learning process, development level of the social infrastructure of the university, level of library funds condition, integration level of the university with the business community, integration level of the university with research structures, including international ones, compliance of a proposed range of educational services with the needs of domestic and international markets, performance of research work of the university, and the role of social infrastructure among these factors is determined. Constituent elements of the social infrastructure of universities (housing and utilities, catering and trade, consumer services, culture and leisure, sports and recreation, communications) are highlighted, their importance for the Russian and Chinese students and the degree of satisfaction are evaluated.References
[1] Aghion, P., Dewatripoint, M., Hoxby, C., Mas-Colell, A., and Sapir A. 2010. The governance and performance of research universities: Evidence from Europe and the USA. Economic Policy, 25(61), 7-59.DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0327.2009.00238.x
[2] Barlett, P. 2011. Campus sustainable food projects: Critique and engagement. American Anthropologist, 113, 101-115. DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2010.01309.x
[3] Buela-Casal, G., Gutiérrez-Martínez, O., Bermúdez-Sánchez, M., and Vadillo-Muñoz, O. 2007. Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities.Scientometrics, 3(71), 349-365.DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1653-8
[4] Butler, J., and Gibson, D. 2013. Research universities in the framework of regional innovation ecosystem: The case of Austin, Texas. Foresight Russia, 7, 42-57.
[5] Carpenter, S., De Fries, R., Dietz, T., Mooney, H., Polasky, S., Reid, W., and Scholes, R. 2006. Millennium ecosystem assessment: Research needs. Science, 314(5797), 257-258. DOI: 10.1126/science.1131946
[6] Churekova, T. 2004. Mission of the university in solving regional problems.University Management, 2(30), 50-53.
[7] De Filippo, D., Casani, F., García-Zorita, C., Efraín-García, P., and Sanz-Casado, E. 2012. Visibility in international rankings. Strategies for enhancing the competitiveness of Spanish universities. Scientometrics, 93(3), 949-966. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0749-y
[8] Dill, D.,and Soo, M. 2005. Academic quality, league tables and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems.Higher Education, 49, 495-533.DOI: 10.1007/s10734-004-1746-8
[9] Filinov, N., and Ruchkina, S. 2002. The ranking of higher education institutions in Russia: some methodological problems.Higher Education in Europe, 27, 407-421.DOI: 10.1080/0379772022000071896
[10] Glänzel, W., and De Lange, C. 2002. A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration.Scientometrics, 54, 75-89.DOI: 10.1023/A:1015684505035
[11] Guerrero, M., and Urbano, D. 2012. The development of an entrepreneurial university. Journal of Technology Transfer, 21,1-43.DOI: 10.1007/s10961-010-9171-x
[12] Harvey, L. 2008.Rankings of higher education institutions: A critical review.Quality in Higher Education, 14(3), 187-207. DOI: 10.1080/13538320802507711
[13] Ilchenko, A., and Abramova, E. 2012. Post-crisis development of the socio-economic infrastructure of small towns. Ivanovo: Ivanovo State University of Chemistry and Technology.
[14] Karnaukhov, N., Barbakova, K., Melihov, V., and Topysheva, L. 2005. University as a scientific and educational corporation: state and development prospects. Tyumen: Publishing House of the ‘Oil and Gas University’.
[15] Kuznetsova, N. 2014. National innovative systems: the level of activity among countries. Life Science Journal, 11(8s),390-393.
[16] Li, M., Shankar, S., and Tang, K. 2011. Why does the USA dominate university league tables? Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 923-937.DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2010.482981
[17] Lim, C.,and Boey, F. 2013. Strategies for academic and research excellence for a young university: Perspectives from Singapore. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 13, 113-123.DOI: 10.3354/esep00139
[18] Liu, N., and Cheng, Y. 2005. The academic ranking of world universities. Higher Education in Europe, 30, 127-136.DOI: 10.1007/s11192-005-0241-z
[19] Logacheva, M. 2001. Social infrastructure as a factor of regional development.The Bulletin of the Ural Institute of Economics, Management and Law, 57-65.
[20] Merisotis, J. 2002. On the ranking of higher education institutions. Higher Education in Europe, 27, 361-363.
[21] Merisotis, J., and Sadlak, J. 2005. Higher education rankings: Evolution, acceptance, and dialogue. Higher Education in Europe, 30, 97-101.DOI: 10.1080/03797720500260124
[22] Mohrman, K. 2013. Are Chinese universities globally competitive? China Quarterly, 215, 727-734.DOI: 10.1017/S0305741013000672
[23] Mok, K. 2014. Enhancing quality of higher education for world–class status: Approaches, strategies, and challenges for Hong Kong. Chinese Education and Society, 47(1), 44-64.DOI: 10.2753/CED1061-1932470103
[24] Mok, K., and Cheung, A. 2011. Global aspirations and strategising for world–class status: New form of politics in higher education governance in Hong Kong. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(3), 161-165. DOI: 10.1080/1360080X.2011.564998
[25] Murray, F. 2013. Evaluating the role of science philanthropy in American research universities. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 13, 23-60.DOI: 10.1086/668238
[26] Ragulina, J., and Zavalko, N. 2013. Integration processes in the chain: Science, higher vocational education and production, as a factor in increasing the competitiveness of the educational institution. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 13, 161-168.DOI: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.13.sesh.1429
[27] Rodionov, D., Rudskaia, I., and Alexandrovna, K. 2014. How key Russian Universities advance to become leaders of worldwide education: Problem analysis and solving. World Applied Sciences Journal, 31(6), 1082-1089.DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.31.06.14347
[28] Smirnova, O. 2013. Functional analysis of the region's infrastructure: methodology and testing.Modern high technologies. Regional supplement, 3, 79-84.
[29] Tallis, H., Kareiva, P.,Marvier, M., and Chang, A. 2008. An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 28(105), 9457-9464.DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0705797105
[30] Wang, J., and Hicks, D. 2013. Detecting structural change in university research systems: A case study of british research policy. Research Evaluation, 22, 258-268.DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvt016
[31] Yonezawa A., Nakatsui I., and Kobayashi, T. 2002. University rankings in Japan.Higher Education in Europe, 27, 373-382.DOI: 10.1080/0379772022000071850
[2] Barlett, P. 2011. Campus sustainable food projects: Critique and engagement. American Anthropologist, 113, 101-115. DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2010.01309.x
[3] Buela-Casal, G., Gutiérrez-Martínez, O., Bermúdez-Sánchez, M., and Vadillo-Muñoz, O. 2007. Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities.Scientometrics, 3(71), 349-365.DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1653-8
[4] Butler, J., and Gibson, D. 2013. Research universities in the framework of regional innovation ecosystem: The case of Austin, Texas. Foresight Russia, 7, 42-57.
[5] Carpenter, S., De Fries, R., Dietz, T., Mooney, H., Polasky, S., Reid, W., and Scholes, R. 2006. Millennium ecosystem assessment: Research needs. Science, 314(5797), 257-258. DOI: 10.1126/science.1131946
[6] Churekova, T. 2004. Mission of the university in solving regional problems.University Management, 2(30), 50-53.
[7] De Filippo, D., Casani, F., García-Zorita, C., Efraín-García, P., and Sanz-Casado, E. 2012. Visibility in international rankings. Strategies for enhancing the competitiveness of Spanish universities. Scientometrics, 93(3), 949-966. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0749-y
[8] Dill, D.,and Soo, M. 2005. Academic quality, league tables and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems.Higher Education, 49, 495-533.DOI: 10.1007/s10734-004-1746-8
[9] Filinov, N., and Ruchkina, S. 2002. The ranking of higher education institutions in Russia: some methodological problems.Higher Education in Europe, 27, 407-421.DOI: 10.1080/0379772022000071896
[10] Glänzel, W., and De Lange, C. 2002. A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration.Scientometrics, 54, 75-89.DOI: 10.1023/A:1015684505035
[11] Guerrero, M., and Urbano, D. 2012. The development of an entrepreneurial university. Journal of Technology Transfer, 21,1-43.DOI: 10.1007/s10961-010-9171-x
[12] Harvey, L. 2008.Rankings of higher education institutions: A critical review.Quality in Higher Education, 14(3), 187-207. DOI: 10.1080/13538320802507711
[13] Ilchenko, A., and Abramova, E. 2012. Post-crisis development of the socio-economic infrastructure of small towns. Ivanovo: Ivanovo State University of Chemistry and Technology.
[14] Karnaukhov, N., Barbakova, K., Melihov, V., and Topysheva, L. 2005. University as a scientific and educational corporation: state and development prospects. Tyumen: Publishing House of the ‘Oil and Gas University’.
[15] Kuznetsova, N. 2014. National innovative systems: the level of activity among countries. Life Science Journal, 11(8s),390-393.
[16] Li, M., Shankar, S., and Tang, K. 2011. Why does the USA dominate university league tables? Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 923-937.DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2010.482981
[17] Lim, C.,and Boey, F. 2013. Strategies for academic and research excellence for a young university: Perspectives from Singapore. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 13, 113-123.DOI: 10.3354/esep00139
[18] Liu, N., and Cheng, Y. 2005. The academic ranking of world universities. Higher Education in Europe, 30, 127-136.DOI: 10.1007/s11192-005-0241-z
[19] Logacheva, M. 2001. Social infrastructure as a factor of regional development.The Bulletin of the Ural Institute of Economics, Management and Law, 57-65.
[20] Merisotis, J. 2002. On the ranking of higher education institutions. Higher Education in Europe, 27, 361-363.
[21] Merisotis, J., and Sadlak, J. 2005. Higher education rankings: Evolution, acceptance, and dialogue. Higher Education in Europe, 30, 97-101.DOI: 10.1080/03797720500260124
[22] Mohrman, K. 2013. Are Chinese universities globally competitive? China Quarterly, 215, 727-734.DOI: 10.1017/S0305741013000672
[23] Mok, K. 2014. Enhancing quality of higher education for world–class status: Approaches, strategies, and challenges for Hong Kong. Chinese Education and Society, 47(1), 44-64.DOI: 10.2753/CED1061-1932470103
[24] Mok, K., and Cheung, A. 2011. Global aspirations and strategising for world–class status: New form of politics in higher education governance in Hong Kong. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(3), 161-165. DOI: 10.1080/1360080X.2011.564998
[25] Murray, F. 2013. Evaluating the role of science philanthropy in American research universities. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 13, 23-60.DOI: 10.1086/668238
[26] Ragulina, J., and Zavalko, N. 2013. Integration processes in the chain: Science, higher vocational education and production, as a factor in increasing the competitiveness of the educational institution. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 13, 161-168.DOI: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.13.sesh.1429
[27] Rodionov, D., Rudskaia, I., and Alexandrovna, K. 2014. How key Russian Universities advance to become leaders of worldwide education: Problem analysis and solving. World Applied Sciences Journal, 31(6), 1082-1089.DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.31.06.14347
[28] Smirnova, O. 2013. Functional analysis of the region's infrastructure: methodology and testing.Modern high technologies. Regional supplement, 3, 79-84.
[29] Tallis, H., Kareiva, P.,Marvier, M., and Chang, A. 2008. An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 28(105), 9457-9464.DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0705797105
[30] Wang, J., and Hicks, D. 2013. Detecting structural change in university research systems: A case study of british research policy. Research Evaluation, 22, 258-268.DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvt016
[31] Yonezawa A., Nakatsui I., and Kobayashi, T. 2002. University rankings in Japan.Higher Education in Europe, 27, 373-382.DOI: 10.1080/0379772022000071850
Published
2016-11-24
How to Cite
ROMANOVA, Irina Matveevna; NOSKOVA, Elena Viktorovna; TROTSENKO, Anastasiya Nikolaevna.
Assessment of the Social Infrastructure of the University as a Factor of its International Competitiveness.
Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 186-197, nov. 2016.
ISSN 2068-696X.
Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/458>. Date accessed: 21 nov. 2024.
Section
Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics
Keywords
social infrastructure; competitiveness factors; competitiveness of the university; satisfaction
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.