About Some Ethnopolitical and Economical Aspects in the Process of State-Building of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan
Abstract
The urgency of the issue researched is stipulated by the fact that in current conditions ethnic identity is not always dominant, much greater importance is given to the level of education and training of every individual, their communication skills etc. Meanwhile, belonging to the people’s culture, the ability to share common values and norms remain still relevant, both for the harmonization of the inner world of the personality as well as in general for the possibilities of social realization. The article highlights some ethnopolitical aspects in the process of state-building of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. The positions prevailing in the Russian, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and foreign scientific thought on the specified range of problems have been analyzed. The purpose of the article is to analyze the ethno-political processes influencing the formation of the statehood of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. In the work, complex scientific and methodological tools have been used: historical, sociological, political, institutional, comparative, system and structural-functional methods of cognition. The materials of the article suggest practical significance for university professors of sociological and legal specialties.
References
[2] Albakova, F.Yu. 2008. Ethnopolitology. Exlibris-Press.
[3] Andreeva, G.M. 1988. Actual Problems of Social Psychology. MSU Publishing House.
[4] Arutyunian, Yu.V. 2003. Transformation of the Post-Soviet Nations: Based on Ethno-sociological Research Materials. Nauka.
[5] Bagramov, E.A. 1982. The National Question in the Struggle of Ideas. Nauka.
[6] Barulin, V.S. 2007. Socio-Philosophical Anthropology. Man and the Public World. Al'ma mater, Akademicheskiyproyekt.
[7] Berry, J. 1999. Psychology of Acculturation. Multiculturalism. Introduction to Ethnic and Cross-Cultural Psychology. Klyuch.
[8] Bizhanov, A.Kh. 1997. Kazakhstan: Democratic Modernization of the Society in Transition. Oner.
[9] Bromley, Yu.V. 1987. Ethnosocial Processes: Theory, History and Modernity. Nauka.
[10] Dias, K.B., and Barreiros, R.M. 2018. Preservatives for rapid growth timber - A review. Periodico Tche Quimica 15(30): 241-251.
[11] Drobizheva, L.M. (Ed.). 2013. Civic, Ethnic and Regional Identity: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya.
[12] Dzhunusov, M.S. 1969. Theory and Practice of National Relations. Kuttybilik.
[13] Elebaeva, A.B. 1984. The Main Levels and Mechanisms for the Development of National Cultures in Soviet Society. Frunze.
[14] Erickson, E. 1996. Life Cycle: Epigenesis of Identity. Theories of Personality in Western European and American Psychology. Bakhrakh-M.
[15] Hajiev, K.S. 2017. Political Sociology: Textbook for Academic Undergraduate. Yurayt.
[16] Galuzo, P.G. 1935.Turkestan – Colony: Essay on the History of the Colonial Policy of the Russian Tsarism in Central Asia. State Publishing House UzSSR.
[17] Gumilev, L.N. 1993. From the History of Eurasia. Nauka.
[18] Isaev, M.I. 1999. Ethnolinguistic Problems of Eurasia (Aspects of Language Planning). General and Oriental Linguistics. Nauka.
[19] Kaldybayeva, O.V., et al. 2018. Youth installations to labour in modern Kazakhstan. International Journal of Learning and Change 10(4): 325-345.
[20] Karpova, T. 2013. Mutually conditional development of small business and social sphere mechanism. Skhid 6(126): 99-104.
[21] Karybaeva, M.A. 1999. National Self-Consciousness: Philosophical and Methodological Analysis. Nauka.
[22] Kholod, M., et al. 2019. Traditional versus budget airlines – comparison of tickets costs and demands on the European air transportation market. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies 149: 215-224.
[23] Kirillova, E.A., et al. 2018. Bitcoin, life coin, name coin: The legal nature of virtual currency. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 9(1): 119-126. DOI: 10.14505/jarle.v9.1(31).16.
[24] Kozlov, V.I. 1999. Ethnos. Nation. Nationalism. Essence and Problematics. Staryy sad.
[25] Menlibaev, K.N. 1995. The Role of National Traditions in Patriotic Education (Based on Materials of Concrete Sociological Research of the Youth of Kazakhstan). Kuttybilik.
[26] Nikovskaia, L.I. 2017. Civil Society through the Prism of Consciousness. Mind at the Crossroads: Public Consciousness Between Past and Future. Aspekt Press.
[27] Oganisian, Yu.S. (Ed.). 2007. National Idea: Countries, Peoples, Societies. Nauka.
[28] Omarov, N.M. 2003. Ethnic dimension of the process of democratic reforms in modern Kyrgyzstan. http://omarov-nur.narod.ru/2002-2003/doklad_19_05_03.doc.
[29] Omuraliev, N.A. 2012. Ethnic Conflicts in the Kyrgyz. Republic: A Sociological Analysis. Ilim.
[30] Pain, E.A. 2017. Nation and Democracy. Prospects for Managing Cultural Diversity. Mysl.
[31] Pimenov, V.V. 1995. Mass Ethnological Studies: Methods and Techniques. Nauka.
[32] Rogachev, P.M., and Sverdlin, M.A. 1967. Nation – the People – Humanity. Politizdat.
[33] Sakulyeva, T., and Kseniia, Z. 2019. The single window mechanism in the field of external sector of the economy. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology 10(2): 2205-2212.
[34] Sikevych, Z.V. 2008. Social Psychology of Ethnic Relations. Nauka.
[35] Silva, S.D.K., Hasan, S.D.M., and Rosa, M.F. 2017. Degradation of the antibiotic metronidazole by advanced oxidative processes. Periodico Tche Quimica 14(28): 72-86.
[36] Soldatova, G.U. 1998. Psychology of Ethnic Tensions. Smysl.
[37] Soros Foundation-Kyrgyzstan. 2002. Comprehensive study ‘Defining approaches to enhancing the civic position of ethnic groups within the overall development of Kyrgyzstan’. http://soros.kg/nashi-prioritety/issledovatel-skie-granty.
[38] Stepanov, E.I. 2008. Modern Conflictology: General Approaches to Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Social Conflicts. Publisher LKI.
[39] Sukhina, O., and Veshnevska, A. 2013. Business development program as a tool for small business support by local authorities in Ukraine. Skhid 6(126): 169-173.
[40] Tishkov, V.I. 2001. Ethnology and Politics. Nauka.
[41] Uledov, A.K. (Ed.). 1984. Society and Consciousness. Progress.
[42] Zdravomyslov, A.G. 2010. The Field of Sociology in the Modern World. Logos.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.