The Notion and Attributes of Right – Terminating Legal Facts

  • Anatoliy V. KOSTRUBA Department of Civil Law, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

Abstract

The paper shows that the basis for the formation of the right-terminating legal facts is laid by the understanding of what should be included in the domain of these facts. The authors demonstrate that the target for understanding the nature of right-terminating legal facts is the development form based on participation of the civilians in the legal relations. As the basis, the authors highlight the civil property legal relations. The paper underlines that the need for this emerges only in case the necessary environment is formed, which strives for self-realization and integrity, contributing to the higher integration of the state into the international structures and increase in the life quality of the population due to the increase in its legal culture. The novelty of the research is defined by the authors in the fact that they have first taken the measures aimed at the general regulation of the legal standards and systemic values of the legal culture of the country. It is noted that the same measures and forms are applied in the developed countries of the European Union. The authors include into the formation of integral environment the perceptions of the legal sources by the population, as well as define the possibility of stratification of the earlier set tasks on the regulation of the forms and methods of the civilians’ participation in court sessions.

References

[1] Asano, M., et al. 2013. Non-Kolmogorovian Approach to the Context-Dependent Systems Breaking the Classical Probability Law. Foundations of Physics 43(7): 895-911.
[2] Bhatia, K.V. 2016. Redefining the Indian public sphere: A study of the LGBT rights movement in India. Media Watch 7(2): 174-184.
[3] Costa, P. 2007. The rule of law: a historical introduction. In: The Rule of Law History, Theory and Criticism. Springer Netherlands, 73-149.
[4] Crowe, M.B. 1977. The Breaking of the Profile and its Re-Making. In: The Changing Profile of the Natural Law. Springer Netherlands, 192-222.
[5] Davies, B. 2013. EU Criminal Law in National Courts: Breaking the Monopoly? Liverpool Law Review 34(3): 241-259.
[6] Davis, M. 1988. The Relative Independence of Punishment Theory. Law and Philosophy 7(3): 321-350.
[7] Gabbay, D.M., and Woods, J. 2011. The Law of Evidence and Labelled Deduction: A Position Paper. In: Approaches to Legal Rationality. Springer Netherlands, 295-331.
[8] Galley, M. 2014. Industry Development and the Process of Disposal. In: Shipbreaking: Hazards and Liabilities. Springer International Publishing, 1-42.
[9] Graham, P.A. 2008. A Defense of Local Miracle Compatibilism. Philosophical Studies 140(1): 65-82.
[10] Haque, A.A. 2013. The Revolution and the Criminal Law. Criminal Law and Philosophy 7(2): 231-253.
[11] Kelly, B. 2015. Conclusion: Not Breaking but Making International Law? In: Military Internees, Prisoners of War and the Irish State during the Second World War. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 108-115.
[12] Kenney, S.J. 2002. Breaking the Silence: Gender Mainstreaming and the Composition of the European Court of Justice. Feminist Legal Studies 10(3): 257-270.
[13] Lebzelter, G.C. 1978. The Forces of Law and Order. In: Political Anti-Semitism in England 1918-1939. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 113-135.
[14] Looijestijn-Clearie, A. 2014. Breaking Up is Hard to Do: Dutch Unbundling Legislation and the Free Movement of Capital. European Business Organization Law Review 15(3): 337-355.
[15] Lunyachek, V., Ruban, N. 2018. Managing intellectual property rights protection in the system of comprehensive secondary education. Public Policy and Administration 17(1): 114-125.
[16] Mousourakis, G. 2012. The Law of Obligations. In: Fundamentals of Roman Private Law. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 183-277.
[17] Ravi Krishnan, C.J.R., Pichaandy, C. 2018. Fishing in the troubled water: Media framing of the human rights violations at Palk Bay. Media Watch 9(1): 141-149.
[18] Skyrms, B. 1998. Salience and Symmetry-Breaking in the Evolution of Convention. Law and Philosophy 17(4): 411-418.
[19] Spaak, T. 2014. Law, Force, and Social Morality. In: A Critical Appraisal of Karl Olivecrona’s Legal Philosophy. Springer International Publishing, 157-180.
[20] Wellman, C., and Feinberg, J. 1970. Reasons for Breaking the Law. The Journal of Value Inquiry 4(4): 261-272.
[21] Zhang, J. 2014a. Advocating Impartiality, Emphasizing Criminal Law and Neglecting Civil Law. In: The Tradition and Modern Transition of Chinese Law. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 85-127.
[22] Zhang, J. 2014b. The Thoughts and Practices of Legal Reform in the Transitional Process. In: The Tradition and Modern Transition of Chinese Law. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 555-670.
Published
2019-03-31
How to Cite
KOSTRUBA, Anatoliy V.. The Notion and Attributes of Right – Terminating Legal Facts. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 1, p. 254-262, mar. 2019. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/4354>. Date accessed: 26 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v10.1(39).26.