Problems of Compulsory Alienation of Land for State Needs: A Comparative Analysis of the Legislation of Kazakhstan and Western Countries

  • Omiruzak KALDARBEKULY Department of Civil Legal Disciplines, Zhetysu State University named after I. Zhansugurov, Taldykorgan, Kazakhstan
  • Kaldarbek DOSSYMBET Department of Civil Legal Disciplines, Zhetysu State University named after I. Zhansugurov, Taldykorgan, Kazakhstan
  • Lazzat YERKINBAYEVA Department of State and Legal Disciplines, Zhetysu State University named after I. Zhansugurov Taldykorgan, Kazakhstan
  • Baurzhan TAUBAYEV Faculty of Law and Economy, Zhetysu State University named after I. Zhansugurov Taldykorgan, Kazakhstan
  • Galym B. TELEUYEV Department of State and Legal Disciplines, Zhetysu State University named after I. Zhansugurov Taldykorgan, Kazakhstan
  • Nazerke MUSSANOVA Department of State and Legal Disciplines, Zhetysu State University named after I. Zhansugurov Taldykorgan, Kazakhstan

Abstract

A number of new economic, political and social conditions, among which are the updated legal framework for ensuring a market economy and establishing private ownership of land, explain the significant changes in the concept and content of land acquisition in Kazakhstan. The public and the private in the property rights are undoubtedly mutually conditioned, these concepts have not only many intersections, but also clashes that reach their climax in the situation of compulsory turning the private property in the public. This article considers the main theoretical aspects of land seizure under the legislation of foreign countries. Determining the general aim of the legislation, the authors made objective scientific conclusions for improving the state-legal regulation of this area.

References

[1] Afanasyeva, S.D. 2015. Constitutional and legal institute of land plots seizure for the public needs: Comparative analysis of the experience of the Russian Federation and the United States of America. PhD diss.,National Research University Higher School of Economics.
[2] Anisimov, A.P., Ryzhenkov, A.Y., and Charkin, S.A. 2009. Land Law of Russia. Higher education, Yurayt-Izdat.
[3] Aristotle. The Athenian Constitution. http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/athenian_const.mb.txt.
[4] Bazarbek, B. 2007. How to Solve the Problem of Land Seizure for the Public Needs. https://kapital.kz/expert/62998/kak-reshit-problemu-izyatiya-zemel-dlya-. 19.09.2017.
[5] Belov, V.A. 2006. Seizure and acquisition by the Russian civil code (conceptual and terminological aspect of the issue). Legislation 7: 8-19.
[6] Bogoliubov, S.A. (Ed.) 2002. Land Law. Yurait.
[7] Constitution of the RK. 1995. https://online.zakon.kz/document/?doc_id=1005029.
[8] Doshchanova, A.S. 2007. Some issues of compulsory seizure of land plots for the public needs under the legislation of Kazakhstan. Journal of Al-Farabi Kazakh National University. http://www.cawater-info.net/bk/land_law/files/doshanova.pdf.
[9] Reynolds, S. 2010. Before Eminent Domain: Toward a History of Expropriation of Land for the Common Good. Chapel Hill.
[10] The Act of Bavaria ‘On Seizure To Be Compensated’. https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-en/chancellor/basic-law-470510.
[11] Kichko, A.I. 2010. Some problems of compulsory land seizure for state and municipal needs. Society and Law 3(24): 91-94.
[12] Korneyev, A.L. 2006. Transactions with Land Plots. Publishing House Gorodets JSC.
[13] Krassov, O.I. 2004. Land Law. Yurist.
[14] Land code of Kazakhstan dated June 20th, 2003 No. 442-II (with amendments and additions as of July 11, 2017). https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=1040583.
[15] Land Code of Ukraine of October 25th, 2001 No. 2768-III (with amendments and additions as of 01.03.2018. www.zakon.kz.
[16] Law of Kazakhstan dated April 16, 1997 No. 94-I ‘On housing relations’. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=1007658.
[17] Nesterova, E.V. 2014. On the need to improve the legal regulation of the seizure of unused land plots used in violation of the law. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31598092#pos=5;-274.
[18] Rice, J. 1978. The effect of land alienation on settlement. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 68(1): 61-72. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2569147.
[19] Rukhtin, S.A. 2007. Compulsory Land Seizure and Other Real Estate in Russia, the US and the UK. ’Arctic 4D’.
[20] US Constitution. 1787. https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript.
Published
2019-03-31
How to Cite
KALDARBEKULY, Omiruzak et al. Problems of Compulsory Alienation of Land for State Needs: A Comparative Analysis of the Legislation of Kazakhstan and Western Countries. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 1, p. 216-226, mar. 2019. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/4346>. Date accessed: 26 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v10.1(39).22.