Peculiarities of Patenting Artificial Intelligence in the United States and Countries of the European Union

  • Valentina A. VASYLYEVA Department of Civil Law Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
  • Alla V. ZELISKO Department of Civil Law Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
  • Liubomyr V. ZINYCH Department of Constitutional, International and Administrative Law Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

Abstract

The article examines legal aspects of patenting of the algorithm and architecture of artificial intelligence under laws of the United States and countries of the European Union (Germany, France, the United Kingdom). The article suggests different approaches to the definition of artificial intelligence. It also analyzes conformity of artificial intelligence to conditions of patentability in various legal systems. Based on the performed analysis of the US and EU legislation, the article addresses certain problematic issues of patenting artificial intelligence and suggests their solutions.

References

[1] Artificial Intelligence Collides with Patent Law. Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. 2018. Available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_48540_WP_End_of_Innovation_Protecting_Patent_Law.pdf
[2] Borana, J. 2016. Applications of Artificial Intelligence & Associated Technologies. Proceeding of International Conference on Emerging Technologies in Engineering, Biomedical, Management and Science [ETEBMS-2016], 5-6 March. Available at: http://www.sdtechnocrates.com/ETEBMS2016/html/papers/ETEBMS-2016_ENG-EE7.pdf
[3] Brayne, S; McKellar, S. and Tzafestas, K. 2018. Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences & Patent Analytics: Market Developments and Intellectual Property Landscape. Available at: https://www.ip-pragmatics.com/media/1049/ip-pragmatics-artificial-intelligence-white-paper.pdf
[4] Code dela Propriété Intellectuelle (version consolidée au 23 février). 2015. Available at: http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=363403
[5] Dorn, S. 2010. German Supreme Court Widens the Door for Software Patents. Available at: https://www.ipeg.com/german-supreme-court-widens-the-door-for-software-patents/
[6] European Parliament Resolution of 16 February with Recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). 2017. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA-2017-0051+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN#BKMD-12
[7] European Patent Convention (16th Edition, June). 2016. Available at: http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/029F2DA107DD667FC125825F005311DA/$File/EPC_16th_edition_2016_en.pdf
[8] Filippovich, M. 2017. Protective Capability of the Algorithm. V International Legal Forum ‘Legal Protection of Intellectual Property: Problems of Theory and Practice’. Sourcebook, Vol. 2. Moscow: Publishing Centre of the Kutafin, Moscow State Law University (MSAL).
[9] German Patent Act as Amended Up to Act of October 8. 2017. Available at: http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=17611
[10] Gürkaynak, G., Yilmaz, I., Doygun, T. and Ince, E. 2017. Questions of Intellectual Property in the Artificial Intelligence Realm. Available at: http://www.gurkaynak.av.tr/docs/8b791-rlj-september-october-2017-.pdf
[11] Hashiguchi, M. 2017. The Global Artificial Intelligence Revolution Challenges Patent Eligibility Laws. Journal of Business and Technology Law 13(1). Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/jbtl/vol13/iss1/2
[12] IP for AI: Can We Patent an Artificial Human Expert? 2017. Barkel Brettell Intellectual Property. Available at: https://www.barkerbrettell.co.uk/ip-ai-can-patent-artificial-human-expert/
[13] Keisner, C.A., Raffo, J. and Wunsch-Vincent, S. 2015. Breakthrough Technologies – Robotics, Innovation and Intellectual Property. Economic Research Working Paper, No.30. Available at: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_econstat_wp_30.pdf
[14] Lemaire, A., Lucazeau, R. and Rappers, T. 2018. Artificial Intelligence – A Strategy for European Startups. Available at: https://www.rolandberger.com/publications/publication_pdf/roland_berger_ai_strategy_for_european_startups.pdf
[15] McGovern, J., et al. 2004. A Practical Guide to Enterprise Architecture. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
[16] Patent Protection for Software in the UK – A Practical Approach. 2016. Available at: https://www.elkfife.com/news-and-views/2016/03/02/software-patents-in-the-uk
[17] Patenting Artificial Intelligence. 2018. Available at: https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/author/elizabeth-raymer/patenting-artificial-intelligence-15387/
[18] Roitblat, H. 2018. Is Artificial Intelligence Patentable? Should It Be? Information Management. Available at: https://www.information-management.com/opinion/is-artificial-intelligence-patentable-should-it-be
[19] Rönnerhed, J. 2018. Artificial Intelligence Outsmarting the Human Perception of What Is Patentable? – An EU Examination of the Patentability of Artificial Intelligence. JAEM03 Master Thesis: Lund University. Lund (Sweden). Available at: https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/8945625
[20] U.S. Patent Law, 35 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. 2015. Available at: http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=15705
[21] USA-China-EU Plans for AI: Where Are We? 2018. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/dem/monitor/sites/default/files/DTM_AI%20USA-China-EU%20plans%20for%20AI%20v5.pdf.
Published
2019-12-11
How to Cite
VASYLYEVA, Valentina A.; ZELISKO, Alla V.; ZINYCH, Liubomyr V.. Peculiarities of Patenting Artificial Intelligence in the United States and Countries of the European Union. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 8, p. 2853-2859, dec. 2019. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/4154>. Date accessed: 19 apr. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9.8(38).34.