Accounting-Analytical and Evaluating Procedures for Defining the Economically Feasible Activities of the Oil Processing Enterprises of Kazakhstan
Abstract
The issue of economic safety of an enterprise implying the security, control, insurance or modernization of the production is currently rather popular. So, the main objective of the paper is narrowed to the characteristics of the accounting-analytical and evaluating procedures for defining the economically feasible activities of the enterprises. The paper presents an analysis of the work of the oil processing enterprises in the territory of Kazakhstan. The novelty of the research is in the fact that due to the devaluation of the national currencies and the decrease in the cost of the oil barrel, a significant extent of the conducted and implemented operations has lost its economic sense. The paper notes that the feasibility of conducting particular financial-economic procedures should be estimated not by the strategical parameter, but also by the set of rules and tricks of the analytical and evaluating procedures. We defined the basic approaches to the evaluation of the attributes for conducting the economically feasible activities.
References
[2] Aspara, J. 2009. How do institutional actors in the financial market assess companies’ product design? the quasi-rational evaluative schemes. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 22(4): 241-258. DOI: 10.1007/s12130-009-9093-9
[3] Barua, A., and Chellappa, R.K. 2002. Quasi-naturally occurring experiments with electronic markets and digital products. In: Business Modelling: Multidisciplinary Approaches Economics, Operational, and Information Systems Perspectives (pp.293-307). Springer US. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0893-9_15
[4] Bennett, C.J, Parsons, C. and Molnar, A. 2014. Forgetting, non-forgetting and quasi-forgetting in social networking: Canadian policy and corporate practice. In: S. Gutwirth, R. Leenes, & P. De Hert (Eds.), Reloading Data Protection: Multidisciplinary Insights and Contemporary Challenges (pp. 41-59). Springer Netherlands. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7540-4_3
[5] Coxall, B. 1992. Quasi-government. In: L. Robins (Ed.), Contemporary British Politics: An Introduction (pp. 160-178). Macmillan Education UK. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-19867-2_8
[6] Dahle, S. 2000. Gaining customer satisfaction through the empowerment of service personnel in retailing organizations. In: T. Hennig-Thurau& U. Hansen (Eds.), Relationship Marketing: Gaining Competitive Advantage through Customer Satisfaction and Customer Retention (pp. 217-230). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-09745-8_12
[7] Davies, M., Paterson, R. and Wilson, A. 1992. Directorsand officer’s loans and transactions. In: UK Gaap: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice in the United Kingdom (pp.1303-1341). Palgrave Macmillan UK. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-12998-0_25
[8] Detter, D., and Fölster, S. 2015. Politicians as consumer advocates instead of quasi-capitalists. In: The Public Wealth of Nations: How Management of Public Assets Can Boost or Bust Economic Growth (pp.63-71). Palgrave Macmillan UK. DOI: 10.1057/9781137519863_5
[9] Edinger-Schons, L.M., Lengler-Graiff, L., Scheidler, S. and Wieseke, J. 2018. Frontline employees as corporate social responsibility (CSR) ambassadors: a quasi-field experiment. Journal of Business Ethics. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-018-3790-9
[10] Gürakar, E.Ç. 2016. Political economy of reform and retrogression in the public procurement system: third party enforcement versus the political settlement in Turkey. In: Politics of Favoritism in Public Procurement in Turkey: Reconfigurations of Dependency Networks in the AKP Era (pp. 23-66). Palgrave Macmillan US. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-59185-2_3
[11] Miranda Sarmento, J. 2018. Specific cases. In: Public Finance and National Accounts in the European Context (pp. 163-210). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-05174-7_14
[12] Paterson, R. 1993. Subsidiaries and quasi subsidiaries. In: Off Balance Sheet Finance (pp. 23-34). Palgrave Macmillan UK. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-12613-2_3
[13] Roos, L.L. 1975. Quasi-experiments and environmental policy. Policy Sciences, 6(3): 249-265. DOI: 10.1007/BF00139969
[14] Scott, Ian. 2003. Organizations in the public sector in hongkong: core government, quasi-government and private bodies with public functions. Public Organization Review, 3(3): 247-67. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025385431809
[15] Steger, U., Ionescu-Somers, A., Salzmann, O. and Mansourian, S. 2009. Quasi-regulation. In: Sustainability Partnerships: The Manager’s Handbook (pp. 213-229). Palgrave Macmillan UK. DOI: 10.1057/9780230594685_6
[16] Suematsu, C. 2014. Coevolution of markets and organizations. In: Transaction Cost Management: Strategies and Practices for a Global Open Economy (pp. 127-142). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06889-3_5
[17] Terry, A., and Di Lernia, C. 2013. Quasi-franchising: a new model for strategic business cooperation. In: T. Ehrmann, J. Windsperger, G. Cliquet & G.Hendrikse (Eds.), Network Governance: Alliances, Cooperatives and Franchise Chains (pp.269-286). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7908-2867-2_15
[18] Thomas, L.C. 1992. Competitive tendering and bidding. In: C. Duncan (Ed.), The Evolution of Public Management: Concepts and Techniques for the 1990s (pp.119-139). Palgrave Macmillan UK. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-11473-3_7
[19] Trifu, A. 2012. The double-way interrelationship between the shadow economy and the economic growth (GDP rate). In: K.Çaliyurt& S.O. Idowu (Eds.), Emerging Fraud: Fraud Cases from Emerging Economies (pp. 75-83). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-20826-3_5
[20] Väyrynen, K., and Kinnula, M. 2012. Differences between success factors of is quasi-outsourcing and conventional outsourcing collaboration: a case study of two finish companies. Electronic Markets, 22(1): 49-61. DOI: 10.1007/s12525-011-0079-6
[21] Walsh, K. 1995. Agencies and devolved control. In: Public Services and Market Mechanisms: Competition, Contracting and the New Public Management (pp. 164-192).Macmillan Education UK. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-23979-5_7
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.