Legislation Peculiarities of Kazakhstan on the Termination of Property Rights and Other Property Priorities
Abstract
The termination of property rights in the modern world is understood as a measure of emergency response and the formation of a negative attitude of a person towards society or public authorities. However, often the termination of property rights is determined by the fact that it is necessary to apply it to prevent a number of negative probable consequences and to implement the principles of social justice. The regulation of this issue is beyond the scope of a purely legal inquiry. In this regard, the main problem is determined by the fact that termination of property rights acts not only as a legal but also a social regulator. The novelty of the study is the position that the termination of property rights in Kazakhstan currently has local uniqueness, which hinders in many cases the implementation of international legislative initiatives. The authors of the article show that the possibility of forming a qualitative filling in the procedure of law termination is based on the principles of achieving justice and legality. The practical significance of the research is determined by the fact that the conducted research allows to create the possibility of increasing the degree of legality of decisions, which are determined by a set of offered rules and regulations in regional legislation.
References
[2] Batraeva, D.E., and N.I. Charkovskaya. 2016. Public ownership right: objects, grounds for occurrence and termination. Innovative Science, 3-2: 19-22.
[3] Belova, T.V. 2016. The theoretical basis for the termination of private property rights in the death and destruction of property. Business in law. Journal of Economics and Law, 4: 81-85.
[4] Brushkovskaya, E.G. 2017. Legal regulation of the grounds for termination of ownership. New Science: From Idea to Result, 1(3): 150-152.
[5] Civil Code of Kazakhstan (General Part) No. 269 ‑ XIII: enforced by the Resolution of the Supreme Council of Kazakhstan dated December 27, 1994. 1994. Vedomosti of the Supreme Council of Kazakhstan 23-24 (appendix). Available at: http://mic.gov.kz/ru/pages/grazhdanskiy-kodeks-respubliki-kazahstan
[6] Damşa, L. 2016. Post-communist Privatisation: An Incomprehensible Neo-liberal Project? In The Transformation of Property Regimes and Transitional Justice in Central Eastern Europe. Springer International Publishing.
[7] Delovoi, T. S. 2015. Requisition as the basis for the forced termination of ownership. Modern Trends in the Development of Science and Technology, 7-6: 51-53.
[8] Dine, J. 1998. The New Company Laws of Eastern Europe. Macmillan Education UK.
[9] Gizatullina, I.I. 2016. Termination of ownership. Science and Education: Innovation, Integration and Development, 1(3): 152-154.
[10] Goryacheva, E.V. 2019. Voluntary refusal as a way to terminate ownership of a dwelling. Business, Management and Law. Available at: http://bmpravo.ru/show_stat.php?stat=879
[11] Gridneva, O.V. 2015. On the issue of termination of ownership of non-profit organizations. Socio-Political Sciences, 2: 67-73.
[12] Ibraeva, A.I. 2016. Termination of ownership: theoretical position and application. Tauride Scientific Observer, 7(12): 129-130.
[13] Isakova, N.A. 2016. Public interest as a basis for limiting or terminating ownership. Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 1: 55-59.
[14] Kembayev, Z. (Ed.). 2009. Regional Integration in the Framework of the Entire Post-Soviet Area. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[15] Konovalov, A.I. 2017. Termination of public ownership actual decisions. Laws and Regulations, 5: 29-31.
[16] Kornilova, N.V. 2016. On certain methods of forced termination of ownership. Russian Investigator, 13: 39-43.
[17] Kurmasheva, Z.S. 2010. Nationalization as a form of compulsory termination of ownership. Collection of materials from the conference ‘The current law of Kazakhstan: Problems of the trend of prospects’. Available at: https://articlekz.com/article/7551.
[18] Oosterveld, W., and Galand, R. 2012. Justice reform, security sector reform and local ownership. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 4(1): 194-209.
[19] Prodanova, N.A., et al. 2017. Formation of system of internal control and features its functioning in the innovative development of industrial enterprises. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(13): 179-189.
[20] Rimmington, A. 1998. Conversion of BW Facilities in Kazakhstan. Springer Netherlands.
[21] Verdiyeva, S. 2018. Trade in Energy: The Case of the Eurasian Economic Union. Springer International Publishing.
[22] Zakieva, R.R., et al. 2018. The significance of studying legal protection of rights on innovative creations: The case of entrepreneurship education. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 22(3): 1-11.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.