Formation of Research Competence of Future Economists in the Process of Mastering Foreign Languages
Abstract
The relevance of the work is determined by the fact that the research competence of students of economic specialties is defined not only as the independence of communicative behavior but also as a product of modern pedagogical technologies. The subject of the work is research competence, which is formed, restructured and perfected in modern synergetic educational process. The novelty of the study is that research competence is interpreted not only as the ability to conduct an independent scientific research and provide its results. The prospect of further study is the possibility of correlating the above-mentioned approach to global educational standards.
References
[2] Ayalon, M. and Even, R. 2015. Students’ Opportunities to Engage in Transformational Algebraic Activity in Different Beginning Algebra Topics and Classes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2): 285-307.
[3] Bertone, S. and Green, P. 2017. Knowing Your Research Students: Devising Models of Doctoral Education for Success. Postgraduate Education in Higher Education, 2: 1-29.
[4] Cartrette, D. P. and Melroe-Lehrman, B. M. 2012. Describing Changes in Undergraduate Students’ Preconceptions of Research Activities. Research in Science Education, 42(6): 1073-1100.
[5] Graham, N. 2012. Understanding What Students Learn, in Understanding Teaching and Learning: Classroom Research Revisited. Sense Publishers.
[6] Johns, J. L. 1984. Students’ Perceptions of Reading: Insights from Research and Pedagogical Implications. Language Awareness and Learning to Read, 4(5): 57-77.
[7] King, P. M. and Mayhew, M.J. 2005. Theory and Research on the Development of Moral Reasoning among College Students. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 19: 375-440.
[8] Kumpulainen, K., Salovaara, H. and Mutanen, M. 2001. The Nature of Students’ Sociocognitive Activity in Handling and Processing Multimedia-Based Science Material in a Small Group Learning Task. Instructional Science, 29(6): 481-515.
[9] Kyvik, S. and Smeby, J-Ch. 1994. Teaching and Research. The Relationship between the Supervision of Graduate Students and Faculty Research Performance. Higher Education, 28(2): 227-239.
[10] Niaz, M. and Rivas, M. 2016. Conclusions and Educational Implications. Students’ Understanding of Research Methodology in the Context of Dynamics of Scientific Progress, 4(3): 51-56.
[11] Ping, M. 2016. Survey and Research on the Levels of High School Students’ Critical Evaluation of Statistical Information and the Influence Factors. The Teaching and Learning of Statistics: International Perspectives, 12: 101-115.
[12] Stockfelt, M., Karlsson, L. and Finizia, C. 2016. Research Interest and Activity among Medical Students in Gothenburg, Sweden, a Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Medical Education, 16(1): 226.
[13] Thompson, J. J., Conaway, E. and Dolan, E. L. 2016. Undergraduate Students’ Development of Social, Cultural, and Human Capital in a Networked Research Experience. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(4): 959-990.
[14] Van Eijck, M. and Roth, W-M. 2007. Rethinking the Role of Information Technology-Based Research Tools in Students’ Development of Scientific Literacy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(3): 225-238.
[15] Vandebrouck, F. 2018. Activity Theory in French Didactic Research. Invited Lectures from the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education: 679-698.
[16] Weston, K. M.2016. Academic Guidance in Medical Student Research: How Well Do Supervisors and Students Understand the Ethics of Human Research? Journal of Academic Ethics, 14(2): 87-102.
[17] Yüksel, I. 2014. Impact of Activity-Based Mathematics Instruction on Students with Different Prior Knowledge and Reading Abilities. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6): 1445-1468.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.