Right to an Effective Remedy of Legal Protection: Practice of the European Court of Human Rights and the Norms of the National Legislation of Ukraine

  • Mykhailo M. KHOMENKO Department of Civil Law, Taras Shevchenko National University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Anatoliy V. KOSTRUBA Department of Civil Law, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
  • Oleksii O. KOT Academician F.H. Burchak Scientific Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship, National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9.7(37).16

Abstract

The article investigates right to effective remedy in the practice of European Court of Human Rights and national courts of Ukraine. The attention is paid to absence in the state of certain discretion which comes down to possibility of selection of remedy for performance of their obligation. Attention is paid to comparison of provisions of legal acts of Ukraine, which determine material and legal remedies of civil rights with Article 13 of Convention and practice of European court. Practice of application by national courts of Ukraine of unnamed remedies of protection of subjective rights and legally protected interests has been researched.

References

[1]. Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine No. 3-rp/2003 of January 30. 2003. Bulletin of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine 1: 24.
[2]. Declaration on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights, High-Level Conference of States Parties to the Council of Europe, Organized by the Turkish Presidency of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. 2011. Izmir (Turkey). Available at: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_a49.
[3]. Declaration on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights, High-Level Conference of States Parties to the Council of Europe, Organized on the Occasion of the United Kingdom's Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. 2012. Brighton (United Kingdom 2012). Available at: http://euroua.com/europe/coe/1420-brajtonskaya-deklaratsiya-perevod.
[4]. Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine dated November 6. No. 9 ‘On Judicial Practice of Consideration of Civil Cases on Recognition of Deeds as Invalid’. 2009. Official Website of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Available at: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0009700-09.
[5]. Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine dated May 29, No. 11 ‘On Certain Issues of Recognition of Trades (Economic Contracts)’ Null and Void. 2013. Bulletin of Economic Judicial Proceedings 4: 22.
[6]. Dudash, T.I. 2013. Practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Kiev: Alerta.
[7]. Gusak, M.B. 2013. A Separate Opinion of the Judge of the Supreme Court of Ukraine dated March 5 in Case No. 21-417а12.
[8]. Kot, O. 2013. Remedies of Protecting the Parties to the Contract in the Private Law of Ukraine. Private Law 2: 203-210.
[9]. Manukyan, V.I. 2006. European Court of Human Rights: Law, Precedents, Comments.Kiev: Istina.
[10]. Miroshnichenko, T.M. 2012. The Right to Effective Remedies for the Rights and Freedoms in Criminal Proceedings and the Practice of Providing them with the European Court of Human Rights. University Scientific Notes 44(4): 388-394.
[11]. Pashuk, T.I. 2006. The Right of a Person to an Effective State Defense of Rights and Freedoms. PhD diss. in Legal Sciences. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv.
[12]. Sadovska, O.V. 2013. Effective Means of Legal Defensein the Context of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: Theoretical Understanding and Empirical Application. Scientific Notes of the V.I. Vernadsky Tauride National University. Series ‘Juridical Sciences’ 26(65): 203-212.
[13]. Stepanov, D.I. 2004. Protection of the Rights of the Owner of the Securities Recorded by the Register on the Account. Moscow: Statute.
[14]. The CC of Russian Federation. 1994. Consultant Plus  the Legislation of the Russian Federation: Codes, Laws, Decrees, Rulings of the Government of the Russian Federation, Normative Acts. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/popular/gkrf1/.
[15]. The CC of the Republic of Azerbaijan. 1999. The Official Web Page of the Ministry of Taxes of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Available at: http://www.taxes.gov.az/uploads/qanun/2011/mecelleler/mulki_mecelle_rus.pdf.
[16]. The CC of the Republic of Belarus. 1998. National Legal Internet Portal of the Republic of Belarus. Available at: http://www.pravo.by/world_of_law/text.asp?RN=Hk9800218.
[17]. The CC of Kazakhstan. 1994. Lawyer  a Set of Legal Information (Legislation) of Kazakhstan. Available at: http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=1006061.
[18]. The CC of the Republic of Moldova. 2002. State Register of Legal Documents of the Republic of Moldova. Available at: http://lex.justice.md/ru/325085/.
[19]. The Civil Code of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic of July 18. 1963. The Official Portal of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Available at: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1540-06.
[20]. The Constitution of Ukraine, Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on June 28. 1996. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, No. 30, Article 141.
[21]. The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of November 4, 1950. 2006. Official Bulletin of Ukraine32: 270.
[22]. The Law of Ukraine ‘On Guarantees of State Regarding Execution of Judicial Decisions’ of June 5. 2012. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine17, Article 158.
[23]. The Law of Ukraine ‘On International Agreements of Ukraine’. 2004. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine50, Article 540.
[24]. The Law of Ukraine’. On the Fulfillment of Decisions and Application of Practice of the European Court of Human Rights’. 2006. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine30: 1114.
[25]. The Unified State Register of Judicial Decisions. 2014a. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/41997017.
[26]. The Unified State Register of Judicial Decisions. 2014b. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/42074391.
[27]. The Unified State Register of Judicial Decisions. 2014c. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/40507833.
[28]. The Unified State Register of Judicial Decisions. 2014d. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/41427832.
[29]. The Unified State Register of Judicial Decisions. 2014e. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/39813753.
[30]. The Unified State Register of Judicial Decisions. 2014f. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/41976795.
[31]. The Unified State Register of Judicial Decisions. 2014g. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/40947458.
[32]. The Unified State Register of Judicial Decisions. 2015b. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/44290237.
[33]. The Unified State Register of Judicial Decisions. 2015c. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/43162789.
[34]. The Unified State Register of Judicial Decisions. 2015d. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/44827108.
[35]. The Unified State Register of Judicial Decisions. 2015e. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/48070279.
[36]. The Unified State Register of Judicial Decisions. 2015f. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/52254546.
[37]. The Unified State Register of Judicial Decisions. 2015g. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/42422846.
[38]. The Unified State Register of Judicial Decisions. 2015h. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/51366443.
[39]. Tsuvina, T.A. 2014. Protection of the Right to a Fair Trial within a Reasonable Term: The Practice of the European Court of Human Rights and the Experience of Foreign Countries. Theory and Practice of Legal Science5(1): 1-13.
[40]. Yarema, A.G. 2007. The Right of a Person to Effective Means of Judicial Protection of Civil Rights and Interests. Scientific Notes of the V.I. Vernadsky Tauride National University. Series ‘Juridical Sciences’20(59): 195-202.
[41]. De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June. 1971. Application No. 832/66; 2835/66; 2899/66.
[42]. Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January. 1978. Application No. 5310/71.
[43]. Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September. 1978. Application No. 5029/71.
[44]. Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March. 1983. Application No. 5947/72; 6205/73; 7052/75; 7061/75; 7107/75; 7113/75; 7136/75.
[45]. Florentino Garcia v. Switzerland, 14 March. 1985. Application No. 10148/82.
[46]. Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 30 August. 1996. Application No. 99/1995/605/693.
[47]. Aksoy v. Turkey, 23 September. 1996. Application No. 71/1997/855/1062-1064.
[48]. Brualla Gomez de la Torre v. Spain, 19 December. 1997. ApplicationNo. 26737/95.
[49]. The Law of Ukraine ‘On Enforcement Proceedings’ of April 21. 1999. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine25, Article 207.
[50]. Kudla v. Poland [GC], 26 October. 2000. Application No. 30210/96.
[51]. Civil Code of Ukraine of January 16. 2003. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine40, Article 356.
[52]. The Commercial Code of Ukraine dated January 16. 2003. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine18, Article 144.
[53]. Ikincisoy v. Turkey, 23 July. 2004. Application No. 26144/95.
[54]. Interlaken Declaration of 19 February. 2010. http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_a48.
[55]. Kharchenko v. Ukraine, 10 February. 2011. Application No. 40107/02.
[56]. Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine of October 24, No. 13 ‘On the practice of consideration by the courts of corporate disputes’. 2008. Bulletin of the Supreme Court of Ukraine11: v0013700-08.
[57]. Decree of the Plenum of the SECU of December 26, No. 18 ‘On Some Issues of the Practice of Applying the Economic Procedural Code of Ukraine by Courts of First Instance’. 2011. Available at: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0018600-11.
Published
2019-11-20
How to Cite
KHOMENKO, Mykhailo M.; KOSTRUBA, Anatoliy V.; KOT, Oleksii O.. Right to an Effective Remedy of Legal Protection: Practice of the European Court of Human Rights and the Norms of the National Legislation of Ukraine. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 7, p. 2324-2335, nov. 2019. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/4061>. Date accessed: 25 apr. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9.7(37).16.
Citation Formats
Issue
Vol 9 No 7 (2018): JARLE Volume IX Issue 7(37) Winter 2018
Section
Articles

The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.