Introduction of Energy Efficient Technologies in the Livestock Complex of Ukraine

  • Oleg V. ZAKHARCHENKO Department of Management and Marketing, Institute of Business and Information Technologies, Odessa State Academy of Construction and Architecture, Odessa, Ukraine
  • Olha M. YEVDOKIMOVA Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Institute of Business and Information Technologies, Odessa State Academy of Construction and Architecture, Odessa, Ukraine
  • Sergii B. KOLODYNSKYI Department of Management and Marketing, Institute of Business and Information Technologies, Odessa State Academy of Construction and Architecture, Odessa, Ukraine
  • Tetiana V. SMELIANETS Department of Management and Marketing, Institute of Business and Information Technologies, Odessa State Academy of Construction and Architecture, Odessa, Ukraine
  • Olena V. BILEHA Department of Management and Marketing, Institute of Business and Information Technologies, Odessa State Academy of Construction and Architecture, Odessa, Ukraine

Abstract

Opportunities for the development of animal husbandry are based on economic, logistic and environmental components that form the development and competitiveness of livestock products on the international market. To do this, we should follow the leading major tendencies in order to improve the efficiency of livestock farms. The article presents the main directions for improving the efficiency of the livestock complex on the basis of mathematical modeling and the economic calculation of performance indicators. The authors chose indicators that are recognized in the international environment as parameters of effectiveness. In particular, the article considers the possibility of reducing the energy consumption by an enterprise as an international indicator, and also forms a holistic economic assessment, which is built on the perception of the need to increase the level of operation. The branch of milk production is chosen as the object of study, as it is most subject to competition not only from traditional producers of milk, but also from producers of its substitutes. The article presents calculations of the yield of products, their energy and weight categories, and also determines the reduction of energy consumption for the milk-producing complex as a whole. A model calculation is given for the practical application of the benefits of reducing energy costs during the modernization of the complex, and not its complete restructuring. The authors think that the further guidelines of development of the studied problem is to bring these indicators to a single indicator of effectiveness in the international technical and economic environment.

References

[1] Akhmetshin, E.M., et al. 2018. Specifics of the fuel and energy complex regulation: Seeking new opportunities for Russian and international aspects. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 8(4): 169-177.
[2] Archimède, H., Mahieu, M., Alexandre, G., and Fleury, J. 2014. Agroecological Resources for Sustainable Livestock Farming in the Humid Tropics. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 14: 299-330.
[3] Barbosa, L.S., Da Rocha, G.P., Teixeira, J.R.F. 2015. The principles of green chemistry and the analytical laboratories sustainability. PeriodicoTcheQuimica 12(24): 111-115.
[4] Baynova, M.S., Dyakonov, M.U., Evstratova, T.A., Sidyak, A.A. 2016. The practice of legal and tax regulation of land relations in agriculture in Russia. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 7(3): 498-504.
[5] Belenov, A.T., et al. 2016. The experience of operation of the solar power plant on the roof of the administrative building in the town of Kamyshin, Volgograd oblast. Applied Solar Energy 52(2): 105-108.
[6] Chen, X., Wilfart, A., Puillet, L., and Aubin, J. 2017. A New Method of Biophysical Allocation in LCA of Livestock Co-Products: Modeling Metabolic Energy Requirements of Body-Tissue Growth. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 22(6): 883-95.
[7] Constantin, T. 2017. Organizational diagnosis and analysis of psychosocial risk factors: A changing paradigm. Psihologia Resurselor Umane 15(1): 3-10.
[8] Daus, Yu.V.,Yudaev, I.V., Stepanchuk, G.V. 2018. Reducing the costs of paying for consumed electric energy by utilizing solar energy. Applied Solar Energy 54(2): 139-143.
[9] Derner, J.D., et al. 2017. Livestock Production Systems. Rangeland Systems: Processes, Management and Challenges 1: 347-72.
[10] Dias, I.C.L., Nunes, G., Castro, A.C.L.D. 2016. Characterization of wastewater of cattle slaughterhouse for its reuse. PeriodicoTcheQuimica 13(26): 59-68.
[11] Föger, B. 2015. Current developments and frontiers in lipid lowering treatment. Zeitschrift fur Gefassmedizin 12(4): 9-14.
[12] Galnaityte, A., Krisciukaitiene, I. 2017. Simulation of sustainable farming practices development in Lithuania. Public Policy and Administration 16(2): 264-278.
[13] Godinot, O. 2015. Relative Nitrogen Efficiency, a New Indicator to Assess Crop Livestock Farming Systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35(2): 857-68.
[14] Gracz, W., Golimowski, W., Butlewski, K., and Marcinkowski, D. 2018. Analysis of the Potential of Methane Emission and Energy Power from Excrement of Livestock in Poland. Renewable Energy Sources: Engineering, Technology, Innovation 2: 139-49.
[15] Ibrayeva, A., et al. 2018. Importance of the Caspian countries for the European Union energy security. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 8(3): 150-159.
[16] Kaldiyarov, D.A., et al. 2017. Cooperation of small forms of managing in agro-industrial sector in Kazakhstan. Espacios 38(62): 13.
[17] Kaldiyarov, D.A., Sharipov, A.K., Bedelbayeva, A.E. 2014. Development of the concept of the optimum mechanism of government administration by economy of agroindustrial complex of Kazakhstan. Life Science Journal 11(84): 394-400.
[18] Kapitonov, I.A., Zhukovskaya, I.V., Khusaenov, R.R., Monakhov, V.A. 2018. Competitiveness and competitive advantages of enterprises in the energy sector. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 8(5): 300-305.
[19] Kaskataev, N., Zholmukhanova, A. 2013. Scientific and methodological grounds for the formation of information and consultancy support system in agriculture. Actual Problems of Economics 145(7): 345-354.
[20] Kiziloz, B., Kupatadze, K. 2015. The impact of ‘wastenet project’ on the ecology of Turkey and Georgia. PeriodicoTcheQuimica 12(23): 39-46.
[21] Kostruba, A.V. 2018. Aspects of civil rights and their integration into international social and environmental legislation. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism 9(5): 995-1002.
[22] Kryukova, E., et al. 2016. On sustainable economic development of the mono town of Baikalsk. International Journal of Economic Research 13(6): 2409-2424.
[23] Lee, H., Hwang, J., and Yoe, H. 2010. A Study of the Energy Efficient MAC Protocol Apply to Ubiquitous Livestock Farming. Future Generation Information Technology 2: 699-707.
[24] Mamedov, G.B, and Mamedov, E.S. 2017. Method for Estimating and Analyzing an Increase of Efficiency of the Ventilation System in a Livestock House. Russian Agricultural Sciences 43(6): 516-18.
[25] Maurya, V.P. 2012. Walking Stress Influence on Livestock Production. Environmental Stress and Amelioration in Livestock Production 1: 75-95.
[26] Mottet, A. 2017. Climate Change Mitigation and Productivity Gains in Livestock Supply Chains: Insights from Regional Case Studies. Regional Environmental Change 17(1): 129-41.
[27] Naskar, S. 2012. Genetic Adaptability of Livestock to Environmental Stresses. Environmental Stress and Amelioration in Livestock Production 1: 317-78.
[28] Niu, Q., and Li, Y.-Y. 2016. Recycling of Livestock Manure into Bioenergy. Recycling of Solid Waste for Biofuels and Bio-Chemicals 1: 165-86.
[29] Onyusheva, I., Ushakov, D., Van, H.T. 2018. The eco-problems and green economy development in Kazakhstan: An analytical survey. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 8(2): 148-153.
[30] Opariuc, D., et al. 2017. Assessment of differential item functioning in personnel selection. Psihologia Resurselor Umane 15(2): 138-148.
[31] Patriota, S.N., et al. 2016. Potential waste of agro-industrial in developing adsorbents of heavy metals. PeriodicoTcheQuimica 13(25): 42-51.
[32] Povorina, E.V., et al. 2017. Improving quality control tools for domestic industrial production. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research 15(12): 283-296.
[33] Qin, F., and Tian, W. 2000. Feeding the Livestock: Technological Choice, Trade Policy and Efficiency. China’s Agriculture at the Crossroads 2: 98-117.
[34] Roma, R. 2015. Life Cycle Assessment in the Livestock and Derived Edible Products Sector. Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector: Case Studies, Methodological Issues and Best Practices 1: 251-332.
[35] Rukavishnikova, I., and Rumyantseva, A. 2018. A Methodical Approach to Assess the Efficiency of Renewable Energy Projects with Regard to Environmental Component. Challenges and Solutions in the Russian Energy Sector 2: 193-200.
[36] Samarina, V., Skufina, T., Samarin, A., Ushakov, D. 2018. Alternative energy sources: Opportunities, experience and prospects of the Russian regions in the context of global trends. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 8(2): 140-147.
[37] Sejian, V. 2015. Introduction to Concepts of Climate Change Impact on Livestock and Its Adaptation and Mitigation. Climate Change Impact on Livestock: Adaptation and Mitigation 3: 1-23.
[38] Silva, S., Rodrigues, A.C., Ferraz, A., and Alonso, J. 2017. An Integrated Approach for Efficient Energy Recovery Production from Livestock and Agro-Industrial Wastes. Waste Biomass Management – A Holistic Approach 1: 339-66.
[39] Somwaru, A., and R. Nehring. 1996. A Graph Efficiency Multiproduct Model of Corn/Livestock Farming: Accounting for Nitrate Pollution. Annals of Operations Research 68(3): 379-408.
[40] Soren, N.M. 2012. Nutritional Manipulations to Optimize Productivity During Environmental Stresses in Livestock. Environmental Stress and Amelioration in Livestock Production 1: 181-218.
[41] Uskenbayeva, R.K., Kurmangaliyeva, B.K., Yedilkhan, D. 2015. Situational management for process implementation of working operations of the business process. 2015 54th Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan, SICE 2015, 7285573, pp. 292-297.
[42] Uskenbayeva, R.K., Kurmangaliyeva, B.K., Yedilkhan, D., Kassymova, A.B. 2015. Principles for achieving the optimal performance of the input tasks flow of a business process and optimal performance of the business process. 2015 54th Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan, SICE 2015, 7285562: 728-733.
[43] vanZanten, H.E. 2016. Global Food Supply: Land Use Efficiency of Livestock Systems. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 21(5): 747-58.
[44] Vanderholm, D.H. 2016. Management of Livestock Wastes for Water Resource Protection. Natural Resources and Control Processes 2: 1-71.
[45] Villa, S.M., et al. 2017. Quality assurance of anions environmental monitoring in IPEN's environmental monitoring program. PeriodicoTcheQuimica 14(27): 91-96.
Published
2019-11-03
How to Cite
ZAKHARCHENKO, Oleg V. et al. Introduction of Energy Efficient Technologies in the Livestock Complex of Ukraine. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 6, p. 2190-2201, nov. 2019. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/3987>. Date accessed: 03 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9.6(36).34.