Universal System of Indicators for Assessing the Activities of Customs Authorities

  • Anna Vladimirovna BOBROVA South Ural State University (National Research University), South Ural Institute of Management and Economics, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
  • Robert Il'izarevich GARIPOV South Ural Institute of Management and Economics, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

Abstract

The subject of our research is the system of indicators for assessing the performance of regional customs directorates and customs offices, and for comparative analysis of the performance results of customs authorities. The purpose of the research is to create a universal system of indicators for regional and local customs authorities. The main method of research is system analysis, which allows us to formulate principles and determine methods of building a universal system of indicators. We also used weights, vertical analysis of indicators, modeling of the criteria for assessing the activities of customs authorities, comparative analysis, induction, approbation, ranking, and mathematical methods in our work. We show that the four groups of current indicators are not linked into a single system, they also duplicate each other, are excessively detailed, and have signs of intra-departmental regulation. We noted difficulties in implementing indicators and contradictions in their calculation methodology. We revealed premises for forming a universal system of indicators to assess the activities of customs authorities. We suggest a dual-purpose system of indicators to solve the issues we noted: from the perspective of the participants of foreign economic activities and customs authorities, the system was brought to the applied level and tested using data from acting customs authorities. We proposed a methodology for forming current, key, two-level, and final indicators for each customs authority. The results of our research can be useful to government bodies, participants of foreign economic activities, and researchers in the field of customs affairs.

References

[1] Abramović, B., Zitricky, V., Biškup, V. 2016. Organization of railway freight transport: case study CIM/SMGS between Slovakia and Ukraine. European Transport Research Review, 8(4): 27.
[2] Andersson, P.F. 2018. Democracy, Urbanization, and Tax Revenue. Studies in Comparative International Development, 53(1):111-150.
[3] Arbit, A., Oren, Y., Wool, A. 2011. Toward practical public key anti-counterfeiting for low-cost EPC tags. IEEE International Conferenceon RFID, 5764620, 184-191.
[4] Beesley, C. 2015. Globalization and corruption in post-Soviet countries: Perverse effects of economic openness. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 56(2): 170-192.
[5] Berlingher, D. 2018. Vasile Goldiş. Journal of Legal Studies, 21(35): 61-77.
[6] Bobrova, A.V. 2017. Assessment of the performance of Russian customs authorities. World Customs Journal, 11 (2): 37-48.
[7] Cantens, T. 2013. Is it Possible to Reform a Customs Administration? The Role of the Customs Elite on the Reform Process in Cameroon. The Role of Elites in Economic Development, January 24. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659036.003.0012.
[8] Geourjon, A.-M., Laporte, B. 2005. Risk management for targeting customs controls in developing countries: A risky venture for revenue performance? Public Administration and Development, 25 (2): 105-113.
[9] Hasik, D., Łapińska, A. 2015. The seizure by customs authorities of counterfeited goods: the ruling by the European Court of Justice in Blomqvist. Rolex and the changes brought about by regulation (EU), 16(1): 73-87.
[10] Imperato, R., et al. 2011. Survey of a flatoxins and ochratox in a contamination in food products imported in Italy. Food Control, 22 (12): 1905-1910.
[11] Javorcik, B.S., Narciso, G. 2017. WTO accession and tariff evasion. Journal of Development Economics, 125: 59-69.
[12] Kirkham, K. 2016. The formation of the Eurasian Economic Union: How successful is the Russian regional hegemony? Journal of Eurasian Studies, 7(2): 111-128.
[13] Malevich, I.V., Berezkina, N.N. 2015. Conceptual aspects of the development of logistics management as part of the customs authority. Review of European Studies, 7 (9): 32-40.
[14] Mindagulov, A. 2013. The mode of government service in custom authorities. World Applied Sciences Journal, 25 (11): 1608-1611
[15] Morini, C., et al. 2015. Towards a balanced approach in the performance indicators of the Brazilian customs. Gestao e Producao, 22 (3): 508-524.
[16] Nurgaliyeva, L. 2016. Kazakhstan's economic soft balancing policy vis-à-vis Russia: From the Eurasian Union to the economic cooperation with Turkey. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 7(1): 92-105.
[17] Özkan, E.D., Nas, S., Güler, N. 2016. Capacity Analysis of Ro-Ro Terminals by Using Simulation Modeling Method. Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 32 (3): 1390147.
[18] Tsvetkov, V.A., Zoidov, K.Kh., Medkov, A.A., Ionicheva, V.N. 2015. Institutional and organizational features of the cross-border freight traffic in the conditions of integration among former Soviet States. Part 1. Economy of Region, 3: 188-204.
[19] Tsvetkov, V.A., Zoidov, K.Kh., Medkov, A.A., Ionicheva, V.N. 2015. Institutional and organizational features of the cross-border freight traffic in the conditions of integration among former Soviet States. Part 2. Economy of Region, 4: 249-259.
Published
2019-10-23
How to Cite
BOBROVA, Anna Vladimirovna; GARIPOV, Robert Il'izarevich. Universal System of Indicators for Assessing the Activities of Customs Authorities. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 6, p. 1910-1923, oct. 2019. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/3947>. Date accessed: 03 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9.6(36).05.