The Admissibility of Statements Provided by an Accused Person in the Russian Criminal Procedure
Abstract
This article substantiates that compliance with the requirement of admissible evidence acquires special significance for a criminal proceedings, which is proved by the analysis of various sources, including the current edition of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Therefore, the article aims to determine the nature of admissible statements of the accused in the Russian criminal procedure as one of the most important types of legal evidence.
The authors of the article have obtained crucial results for the study of criminal proceedings, defined the basic requirements that should be met by admissible statements of an accused person, analyzed rules for admitting statements of the accused, performed their general characterization and formulated the main provisions defining the essence of statements provided by the accused in criminal proceedings. The main conclusion reached in this article is that the admissibility of statements provided by the accused should comply with the following basic rules: (1) the rule of appropriate subjects authorized by virtue of the existing Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation to carry out procedural actions for collecting (obtaining, recording) evidence; (2) the rule of proper information sources on the facts provided for by the current Criminal Procedure Code; (3) the rule of proper proceedings stipulated by the current Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation for collecting (receiving, recording) evidence; (4) the rule of the proper procedure provided for by the current Criminal Procedure Code for collecting (receiving, recording) evidence from the viewpoint of its proper obtaining is considered as the need to comply with requirements of the Criminal Procedure Code.
References
[2] Chistova, N. I. 2006. Priznanie nedopustimymi dokazatelstv, poluchennykh na predvaritelnom sledstvii [The inadmissibility of evidences received during preliminary investigation]: thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences: 12.00.09. Krasnodar, 76-77.
[3] Dukhovskii, M. V. 1910. Russkii ugolovnyi protsess [The Russian criminal process]. Moscow: Tip. A.P. Poplavskogo, 18.
[4] Kipnis, N. M. 1995. Dopustimost dokazatelstv v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [The admissibility of evidences in the criminal procedure]. Moscow: Yurist, 5.
[5] Kostenko, R. V. 2006. Ugolovno-protsessualnye dokazatelstva: kontseptsiya i obshchaya kharakteristika [Criminally remedial evidences: concept and general characterization]. Saint Petersburg: izd-vo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD RF, 103-104.
[6] Kudin, F. M., Kostenko, R. V. 2002. Dopustimost dokazatelstv v rossiiskom ugolovnom protsesse [The admissibility of evidences in the Russian criminal process]: Student's book. Krasnodar: Izd-vo KubGAU, 5.
[7] Lazareva, V. A. 2009. Dokazyvanie v ugolovnom protsesse [Evidence in the criminal process]: workbook. Moscow: Vysshee obrazovanie, 163-169;
[8] Lupinskaya, P.A. 2009. Ugolovno-protsessualnoe pravo Rossiiskoi Federatsii [The criminal procedure law of the Russian Federation]: Student's book. 2nd enlarged and revised edition. Moscow: Norma, 230-231.
[9] Lyakhov, Yu. A. 1999. Dopustimost dokazatelstv v rossiiskom ugolovnom protsesse [The admissibility of evidences in the Russian criminal process]. Moscow: Ekspertnoe byuro, 3.
[10] Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 05.03.2004 N 1 (red. ot 01.06.2017) "O primenenii sudami norm Ugolovno-protsessualnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii" [Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 1 "On certain issues of court application of provisions of the civil procedure code of the Russian Federation"]. March 5, 2004. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_47059/
[11] Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 31 oktyabrya 1995 g. N 8 "O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniya sudami Konstitutsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii pri osushchestvlenii pravosudiya" [Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 8 "On some issues of application by the courts of the Constitution of the Russian Federation"]. October 31, 1995. Sistema GARANT. http://base.garant.ru/10103328
[12] Sheifer, S. A. 2014. Dokazatelstva i dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam: problemy teorii i pravovogo regulirovaniya [Evidences and proof in criminal cases: theoretical problems and legal regulation]: monograph. Moscow: Norma, INFRA-M, 72-74.
[13] Zolotykh, V. V. 1999. Proverka dopustimosti dokazatelstv v ugolovnom protsesse [Verifying the admissibility of evidences in the criminal process]. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks, 4.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.