Institute of Dispute Resolution by the Participation of a Judge in the Court of Ukraine: Joint and Different Characteristics with the Institute of Mediation in Ukraine
Abstract
The relevance of this article is explained by the fact that in 2017 a new procedural institute – dispute resolution by the participation of a judge was introduced into the legal science of Ukraine, as well as in the judicial practice of Ukraine. In the jurisprudence of Ukraine, there is no consensus on the unity or difference between the institute of mediation in Ukraine and the institute of dispute resolution by the participation of a judge in Ukraine. The purpose of the article is the scientific and practical analysis of the norms of the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine, the Commercial and Procedural Code of Ukraine and the Code of Administrative Proceedings of Ukraine in terms of determining the procedure for resolving a dispute by the participation of a judge, as well as determining the common and distinctive features of the mediation institute and the institute of dispute resolution by the participation of a judge under Ukrainian law. The article proposes improvements of Ukrainian legislation.
References
[2] Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine. 2004. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15.
[3] Code of Administrative Proceedings of Ukraine. 2005. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15.
[4] Commercial and Procedural Code of Ukraine. 1992. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1798-12.
[5] Constitution of Ukraine. 1996. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/en/254к/96-вр.
[6] Karmaza, O.O. 2017. Institute of Mediation: Basic Concepts of Development. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law 2: 24-28.
[7] Karmaza, O.O. 2018. Institute of dispute resolution by the participation of a judge and mediation institute in Ukraine: comparative analysis. International Multidisciplinary Conference Science and Technology of the Present Time: Priority Development Directions of Ukraine and Poland, Oct., in Wolomin, Republic of Poland.
[8] Koroied, S.O. 2017. Dispute resolution as an independent task of civil justice under the draft new edition of Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine: the influence of the dispute resolution institution by the participation of a judge on the effectiveness of the civil process. Sudova Apelyaciya 3(48): 79-88.
[9] Mozhaykina, O. 2018. Legal analysis of a dispute resolution by the participation of a judge. Foreign Trade: Economics, Finance, Law 2: 174-180.
[10] On mediation. Draft Law of Ukraine (Reg. No. 3665). 2015, http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=57463.
[11] Recommendation No. R (98) 1. Committee of Ministers. Council of Europe. January 21, 1998, https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=09000016804ecb6e
[12] Tsuvina, T.A. 2017. Introduction of the institute of mediation as a promising direction of reforming civil procedural legislation. International scientific and practical conference Ukraine on the way to Europe: the reform of civil procedural legislation, July 7, in Kyiv. Ukraine.
[13] Tykhanskyi, O. 2018. Place of the institute of a civil dispute resolution by the participation of a judge in the systematization of conciliation procedures. Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs 2(107): 31-39.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.