Principles of Acceptance and Mistakes in the Implementation of Criminal Procedural Decisions
Abstract
The relevance of the study problem is caused by the need to ensure the legality, validity and substantiation of criminal procedural decisions, which ultimately leads to the achievement of goals and objectives of criminal proceedings.
Purpose of the article: the purpose of the article is to develop the principles of decision-making by the subject of criminal procedural activity, as well as identifying the typical mistakes in their implementation.
Study methods: The basis of problem solving in terms of criminal procedural decision-making and implementation is the system-based and activity approach and the methodological provisions of the decision-making theory, which allowed to identify patterns in the process of criminal procedural decision-making and implementation by the representative of criminal proceeding bodies and other participants of the proceeding.
Study results: The principle systems of decision-making by the subject of criminal procedural activity is provided; the levels and stages of procedural decision-making and implementation are outlined, typical mistakes made by the subject of criminal procedural decision are determined taking into account the level of decision-making and the violated principle.
Practical relevance: The identified patterns, principles, stages and levels of decision-making, as well as the typical mistakes formulated, will have a significant impact on improving the viability of decisions made in the criminal proceedings, and recommendations based on them contribute to ensuring the rule of law in the activities of judges, investigators, prosecutors and other participants in the proceedings.
References
[2] Anokhin, P.K. 1978. The Problem of Decision Making in Psychology and Physiology. Selected Works. Philosophical Aspects of the Theory of a Functional System. Moscow: Nauka, 1978.
[3] Avanesov, G.A. 1972. Theory and Methodology of Criminological Forecasting. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya Literatura.
[4] Avrah, Ya.S. 1972. Psychological Problems of Protection in Criminal Cases. Kazan: Publishing house of Kazan University.
[5] Baev, O.Ya. 1995. The Tactics of Investigative Actions. Voronezh: NGO ‘MODEK’.
[6] Baev, O.Ya. 2007. Criminal Procedural Investigation of Crimes: The System and its Quality. Moscow: Yurlitinform.
[7] Belkin, R.S. 1988. Forensic Science: Problems, Trends, Perspectives. From Theory to Practice. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya Literatura.
[8] Belkin, R.S. 1997. Course of Criminology. General Theory of Criminalistics. Moscow: Yurist.
[9] Dospulov, G.G. 1996. Psychology of Interrogation in Criminal Proceedings. Almaty: Gylym.
[10] Druzhinin, V.V., and Kontorov, D.S. 1972. Idea, Algorithm, Solution. Moscow: Voyenizdat.
[11] Druzhinin, V.V., Kontorov, D.S., and Kontorov, M.D. 1989. Introduction to the Theory of Conflict. Moscow: Radio i Svyaz'.
[12] Frolov, I.T. 1987. Philosophical Dictionary. Moscow: Politizdat.
[13] Frolova, Y.V., Medvedeva, N.V., Senicheva, L.V., Bondaletov, V.V. 2015. The security of citizens against criminal offences in modern Russia: Key tendencies and determinants. Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law 9(3): 525-537.
[14] Gaprindashvili, R.E. 2014. The theoretical basis for the occurrence of errors in the adoption of procedural decisions.Bulletin of the Peoples Friendship University of Russia 4: 231-237.
[15] Ginsburg, A.Ya. 1974. Principles of Soviet Criminalistics. Karaganda: The USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs.
[16] Hall, A.D., and Feiding, R.E. 1969. Definition of the Concept of System. Studies on the General Theory of Systems. Moscow: Progress.
[17] Konovalova, V.E. 1981. Forensic Tactics: Principles and Functions. Forensic Science and Forensic Examination. Kyiv: Vyshcha Shkola.
[18] Kozyrev, M.S., Maslikov, V.A. 2016. The use of correlation analysis for the study of some crimes committed in Moscow. Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law 10(1): 28-39.
[19] Lomov, B.F. 1977. Fundamentals of Engineering Psychology. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola.
[20] Lomov, B.F. 1984. Methodological and Theoretical Problems of Psychology. Moscow: Nauka.
[21] Lupinskaya, P.A. 1976. Decisions in Criminal Proceedings. Their Types, Content and Forms. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya Literatura.
[22] Pasechnik, G.S. 1977. Introduction to Decision theory. The Theory of Forecasting and Decision Making. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola.
[23] Pronkina, A.N. 2006. Mistakes of defense lawyers in criminal proceedings. PhD diss., Voronezh State University.
[24] Rubinstein, S.L. 1989. Fundamentals of General Psychology. Moscow: Pedagogika.
[25] Sorkin, V.S. 1996. Problems of formation of strategy and tactics of protection. PhD diss., Grodno State University.
[26] Stolmakov, A.I. 1981. Types of Violations of the Law in the Criminal Procedure, their Characteristics and the Problem of Delictology. Criminal Procedural Activity and Legal Relations in the Stage of Preliminary Investigation. Volgograd: VSH USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs.
[27] Varfolomeyeva, Т.V. 1984. Questions of Defense tactics in criminal proceedings. Forensics and Court. Expertise. Kyiv: Vyshcha Shkola.
[28] Vasiliev, A.N. 1976. Investigative Tactics. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya Literatura.
[29] Vedishchev, N.P. 2007. Errors of Justice and Their Elimination (Criminal Procedural Aspects). From the File of the Lawyer. Moscow: Publishing House ‘Yurlitinform’.
[30] Yakushin, S.Yu. 1983. Tactical Methods in the Investigation of Crimes. Kazan: Publishing House of Kazan University.
[31] Yudin, B.G. 1970. Methodological Problems of the Study of Self-Organizing Systems. Problems of Methodology of System Research. Moscow: Mysl'.
[32] Zavalishina, D.N., Lomov, B.F., and Rubakhin, V.F. 1976. Levels and Stages of Decision Making. Problems of Decision Making. Moscow: Nauka.
[33] Zelenetsky, V.S. 1976. Adoption of Procedural Decisions in an Equilibrium Situation. Problems of Socialist Legality. Kharkov: Publishing house of Kharkov University.
[34] Zhamiyeva, R.M. 2014. The Criminal Procedural Law of the RK. General Part. Karaganda: Publishing house of Karaganda State University.
[35] Zhamiyeva, R.M., and Ussenov, F. 2017. Defense versions in advocacy.Bulletin of the Karaganda University. LAW Series 1: 49–59.
[36] Zhamiyeva, R.M., and Zhakupov, B.A., Ganchevsky, B. 2017. The purpose and tasks of defense in criminal case.Bulletin of the Karaganda University. LAW Series 3: 52–60.
[37] Zorin, G.A. 1991. The problems of using special logical-psychological methods in the preparation and conduct of investigative actions. PhD diss., All-Union Scientific Research Institute of the Problems of Strengthening the Rule of Law and Order.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.