Forensic Enquiry as a Method for Objective Evidence Verification

  • Roman V. KOSTENKO Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russian Federation
  • Ekaterina S. TOKARENKO Krasnodar University of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia, Krasnodar, Russian Federation

Abstract

The article considers relevant aspects of the essence of forensic enquiry in criminal cases. The author analyzes the attributes of forensic enquiry and justifies its attribution to investigative actions, the main objective of which is to verify the evidence: (1) purpose - the verification of evidence; (2) the basis for forensic enquiry is the data obtained by procedural means; (3) the supporting role of evidence obtained as a result of the expert study; (4) comparative analysis is the main method of study used in this investigative action; (5) the complex nature of forensic enquiry. The article gives the examples from court practice, illustrating the importance of forensic enquiry in establishing the circumstances to be proved, as well as the identification of objective causal relationships between the material, ideal traces and the event of crime reflected in the surrounding reality.

References

[1] Arkhiv Krasnodarskogo Kraevogo suda. Ugolovnoe delo 2-3/16. 2016. [Archives of the Krasnodar Regional Court. Criminal Case No. 2-3/16].
[2] Arkhiv Tikhoretskogo raionnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya. Ugolovnoe delo, 1-37/17. 2017. [Archive of the Tikhoretsky District Court of the Krasnodar Territory. Criminal Case No. 1-37/17].
[3] Averyanova, T. V. 2014. Sudebnaya ekspertiza: kurs obshchei teorii. [Forensic Enquiry: A Course of General Theory]. Moscow: NORMA: INFRA-M. pp. 480.
[4] Burkov, I. V. 2010. Zaklyuchenie i pokazaniya eksperta v ugolovnom protsesse. Monografiya [Conclusion and Evidence of the Expert in the Criminal Procedure]. Moscow: Yurlitinform. pp. 46.
[5] Burkov, I.V. 2010. Zaklyuchenie i pokazaniya eksperta v ugolovnom protsesse. Monografiya [Opinion and Evidence of the Expert in the Criminal Procedure. Monograph]. Moscow: Yurlitinform. pp. 144.
[6] Knyazkov, A. S. 2014. Problemy dokazatelstvennoi znachimosti naznacheniya, proizvodstva i otsenki rezultatov sudebnoi ekspertizy. [Problems of the Evidentiary Significance of the Appointment, Production and Evaluation of the Results of Forensic Enquiry]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo, 4(14), 81-86.
[7] Lazareva, V. A. 2000. Sudebnaya zashchita v ugolovnom protsesse RF: problemy teorii i praktiki: PhD dissertation (Jurisprudence). [Judicial Protection in the Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation: Problems of Theory and Practice (Doctoral Thesis Abstract)]. Samara State University, Samara, pp. 42.
[8] Mamedov, R. Ya. 2015. Predstavlenie veshchestvennykh dokazatelstv v sisteme sposobov sobiraniya dokazatelstv v dosudebnom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. [Representation of Physical Evidence in the System of Methods of Collecting Evidence in Pretrial Criminal Proceedings]. Aprobatsiya, 4(31), 68-71.
[9] Petrov, A. I. 2016. Veshchestvennye dokazatelstva v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. [Material Evidence in Criminal Proceedings]. Zakonnost i pravoporyadok v sovremennom obshchestve, 31, 143-147.
[10] Pisarev, E. V. 2014. Informatsionnoe vzaimodeistvie sledovatelya s ekspertom. [Informational Interaction of the Investigator with the Expert]. Vektor nauki TGU, 3, 211-214.
[11] Selina, E. Ya. 2003. Dokazyvanie s ispolzovaniem spetsialnykh poznanii po ugolovnym delam. [Proving with the Use of Special Knowledge in Criminal Cases]. Moscow: Yurlitinform.
[12] Sheifer, S. A. 2004. Sledstvennye deistviya. Osnovaniya, protsessualnyi poryadok i dokazatelstvennoe znachenie. [Investigative Actions. Grounds, Procedural Order and Evidentiary Value]. Moscow: Yurlitinform, pp. 184.
[13] Stelmakh, V. Yu. 2016. Nekotorye protsessualnye aspekty vzaimodeistviya sledovatelya i eksperta pri naznachenii i proizvodstve sudebnoi ekspertizy. [Some Procedural Aspects of Interaction of the Investigator and the Expert in the Appointment and Production of Forensic Enquiry]. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. Nekrasova, 2, 226-230.
[14] Yurova, K. I., Gurin, A. A. 2017. Otsenka zaklyucheniya eksperta v ugolovnom protsesse. [Assessment of the Expert Opinion in the Criminal Procedure]. In Fundamentalnye i prikladnye nauchnye issledovaniya: aktualnye voprosy, dostizheniya i innovatsii: sb. nauch. st. po itogam V Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Fundamental and Applied Scientific Research: Current Issues, Achievements and Innovations: Collection of Scientific Articles Based on the Results of the V International Scientific-Practical Conference]. Penza: Nauka i prosveshchenie, pp. 94-96.
Published
2018-06-30
How to Cite
KOSTENKO, Roman V.; TOKARENKO, Ekaterina S.. Forensic Enquiry as a Method for Objective Evidence Verification. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 4, p. 1312-1316, june 2018. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/2812>. Date accessed: 25 feb. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9.4(34).17.