The Tools of Social Technologies in the Management System: Private and Public
Abstract
In the article, the authors consider the specifics of the term social technology and the use of social technology tools. The study is based on the fundamental ideas of sociology, comparative analysis, and interdisciplinary approach. The theoretical study is based on conceptual works and research results of Russian and foreign authors devoted to the analysis of the use of social technologies of management. It was determined, which tools are public and which-private. In the article, the authors present the results of an empirical study of the ideological and personnel tools of social technology in the management system. The assignment of social technology is the optimization of the managerial process for obtaining a socio-economic result. The management system, that functioning in the organization, is having the main share of the influence on the effectiveness of the company. Few managers are apt to revise the management principles. In the course of the study, a method of further training and career advancement has been demonstrated in the framework of personnel management, it has been established, that this method is not always effective. For social management, the problems of finding the most effective, existing tools that used in the areas of transformative or corrective social practice are still relevant. Management tools used within social technology of management are multiform. These include ideological, staffing, technological, socio-economic, and informational. It should be noted that the object of management – has a certain influence on what tools will be more effective. Rather, it is effective in different organizations on the different working conditions and gender affiliation. To improve management efficiency, it is necessary to use optimal tools in the technology of practical activity. Social experiments were conducted. Were selected organizations that are in the field of ‘Production’ (N = 40), ‘Trade’ (N = 45), ‘Construction’ (N = 50). To the tools of social technology in the management system belong ideological, staffing, technological, socio-economic, information. Ideological and personnel only were used. Tools can have public and private character. The results obtained in the study make it possible to supplement theoretical sociology in the aspect of sociology of management. The data obtained in the course of the experiment allowed establishing that the ideological management tool as a mission is not sufficiently used in organizations. Two principles are analyzed, the first is connected with personal connections, acquaintances, recommendations; the second principle was based on ads in the media, the Internet and public channels of communication. It has been established that age matters for men working in construction organizations. In organizations, management tools such as reassignment to higher positions, the ‘The board of honor’, are underused. The advanced training at the organization expense practically not used. At the respondents of the trade organization were not involved such personal motives as respect from the side of a Head, respect from the side of colleagues, and awareness of the social significance of their work. Most often, respondents point out such a way of training personnel as on-the-job training. This gives a certain positive result regardless of the organization. The research results can be used in further work on the problems of the tools of management.
References
[2] Akhmetshin, E., Morozov, I., Pavlyuk, A., Yumashev, A., Yumasheva, N., Gubarkov, S. 2018. Motivation of personnel in an innovative business climate. European Research Studies Journal 21(1): 352-361.
[3] Dai, L.I.U. 2015. The Management Information System Research of Ideological and Political Work Based on Workflow. Litres.
[4] Gornostaeva, Zh.V., Ershova, S.I., Zhidkov, V.E., Baklakova, V.V. 2017. To the question of modern approaches to the training of staff of the organization with the aim of increasing the level of competitiveness. Kant 2 (23).
[5] Kenny, M. 2011. Gender and institutions of political recruitment: Candidate selection in post-devolution Scotland. In Gender, Politics and Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan.
[6] Kolesnikov, Yu.A., Pavlyuk, A.V., Radachinsky, Yu.N., Rodionova, N.D. 2018. Problems of Implementation of Public-Private Partnership in Russia. European Research Studies Journal 21: 187-197.
[7] Kozel, I.V., Vorobyeva, N.V. 2015. The practice of using SWOT-analysis to develop an organization development strategy. Siberian School of Finance, 1: 37-40.
[8] Kuzina, O.E., Chernysheva, M.V. 2015. Corporate charity and responsibility: the rationale of concepts. Monitoring public opinion: economic and social changes, 4(128): 154-165.
[9] Kuzina, O., Chernysheva, M. 2016. Corporate charity and corporate philanthropy: an economic-sociological analysis. Economic Issues 3: 115-131.
[10] Lapygin, Y., Lapygin, D. 2017. Managerial decisions. Litres.
[11] Leonardi, P.M., Huysman, M., Steinfield, C. 2013. Enterprise social media: Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1): 1-19.
[12] Maben, J., Peccei, R., Adams, M., Robert, G., Richardson, A., Murrells, T., Morrow, E. 2012. Exploring the relationship between patients’ experiences of care and the influence of staff motivation, affect and wellbeing. Final report. NIHR Service Delivery and Organization Program.
[13] Makurin, A.A. 2018. The role of information in the current economic environment on the enterprise. UzhNU ‘Hoverla’.
[14] Markov, M. 1982. Technology and efficiency of social management. Progress.
[15] Melnikov, M.V. 2015. The dichotomy of private and public in the problems of sociological knowledge. Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice 12-4: 123-128.
[16] Motiwalla, L.F., Thompson, J. 2012. Enterprise systems for management. Pearson.
[17] Panagiotakopoulos, A. 2014. Enhancing staff motivation in ‘tough’ periods: Implications for business leaders. Strategic Direction 30(6): 35-36.
[18] Santoro, G., Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., Dezi, L. 2017. The internet of things: building a knowledge management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 99: 222-230.
[19] Semina, A.P., Fedotova, M.A., Tikhonov, A.I. 2016. The personnel training in the modern companies: problems and new directions. Moscow Economic Journal 3.
[20] Shcherbina, V.V. 2003. The problem of the management in the field of human resource management. Sociological Studies 7: 57-69.
[21] Shcherbina, V.V. 2014. Social technologies: the history of the term, the transformation of content, the current state. Sociological Studies 7: 113-124.
[22] Smorgunov, L.V. 2011. In search of manageability: the transformation of the theory of public administration in the XXI century. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Series 6. Political science. International Relations 4.
[23] Toschenko, J.T. 2013. New trends in the development of Russian sociology. Humanitarian of the South of Russia 1: 35-37
[24] Toshchenko, J.T. 2011. Sociology of management. Center for Social Forecasting and Marketing.
[25] Urubkov, A., Fedotov, I. 2017. Methods and models for optimizing management decisions. Litres.
[26] Urzha, O.A. 2017. Social Engineering as Methodology of Management Activity. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia 10: 87-96.
[27] Vinichenko, M.V., Kirillov, A.V., Frolova, E.V., Kaurova, O.V., Makushkin, S.A. 2016. Monitoring of working conditions and the nature of their influence on health of students and academic staff. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11(11): 4564-4577.
[28] Werhane, P.H. 2010. Principles and practices for corporate responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(4): 695-701.
[29] Zelinskaya, M.V., Pronin, E.S. 2015. A systematic approach in the selection of personnel: the main stages and criteria. Polythematic network electronic scientific journal of the Kuban State Agrarian University.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.