‘Wrong Price Tag’ at a Supermarket in the Focus of General Principles of Law

  • Sergei Viktorovich KOROLEV Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ISL RAS), Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Yuri Leonidovich SHULZHENKO Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ISL RAS), Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Ekaterina Petrovna RUSAKOVA Pеоples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Albina Ramazanovna BATYAEVA Pеоples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Mihail Nikolaevich DUDIN Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Moscow, Russian Federation

Abstract

The article compares the German and Russian sales contract models by the example of civil cases illustrating the specifics of shopping at a supermarket. Analyzing the ratio of offer and acceptance, as well as the specifics of invitatio ad offerendum and the so-called public agreement, the authors capture the gaps of legal regulation for both models. Basing on the materials presented in this article, the authors consider it necessary to formulate the following main conclusions:


  • legal uncertainties exist not only in the civil and economic transactions in Russia and Germany. The civil cases considered in this article were studied not only from the perspective of national legislation norms of Germany and Russia but also in the context of general principles of law, the reasonable person standard and the trust protection principle;

  • the model of the sales contract adopted in the Russian law leaves the seller and the buyer in a stalemate when solving the problem of a wrong price tag at the supermarket checkout. Moreover, such model in the trend creates a complex legal and technical issue. On the contrary, the German law model of the sales contract unambiguously indicates the fact that it is impossible to recognize the wrong price tag as mandatory, as this contravenes with the freedom-of-contract doctrine;

  • the dominant paradigm of legal positivism determines that legal value is given only to the principles clearly entrenched in the active legislation. In the absence of positive law standards, these gaps can be filled by applying the general principles of law recognized by the civilized nations.

References

[1] Berger, A.A. 2018. Millennials as Shoppers and Consumers. In Cultural Perspectives on Millennials. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan: 75-83.
[2] Brox, H. 1992. Besonderes Schuldrecht (18. Auflage). München: Beck: 2
[3] Bucic, T., Harris, J., Arli, D. 2012. Ethical Consumers among the Millennials: A Cross-National Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(1), 113-131.
[4] Däubler, W. 2003. BGB Kompakt: Systematische Darstellung des Zivilrechts (2. Auflage). München: Deutscher Taschenbuchverlag: 419-421.
[5] Dörner, et al. 2002. BGB: Handkommentar (2. Auflage). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag: 111.
[6] Dudin, M.N., and Frolova, E.E. 2015. The Balanced Scorecard as a basis for strategic company management in the context of the world economy transformation. Asian Social Science, 3, 282-288.
[7] Dudin, М.N., Smirnov, V.P., Rusakova, E.P. 2017. The Formation of Entrepreneurship in Russia: Historical Background and Modernity. Bylye gody, 46(4), 1174-1183.
[8] Kaganova, A.S. 2017. Tipichnye oshibki merchendaizinga [Typical Mistakes of Merchandising]. In Problemy formirovaniya edinogo nauchnogo prostranstva [Problems of Uniform Scientific Space Formation]. Chelyabinsk: 115-119.
[9] Schapp, J. 2006. Sistema germanskogo grazhdanskogo prava [The System of German Civil Law] (S.V. Koroleva, Trans.). Мoscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya: 88.
[10] Sukhanov, E.A. (Ed.). 2006. Grazhdanskoe pravo v 4 t. Tom 3: Obyazatelstvennoe pravo [Civil Law in 4 Volumes. Volume 3: Law of Obligation]. Moscow: Wolters Kluwer: 235.
Published
2018-12-23
How to Cite
KOROLEV, Sergei Viktorovich et al. ‘Wrong Price Tag’ at a Supermarket in the Focus of General Principles of Law. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 3(33), p. 1004-1010, dec. 2018. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/2551>. Date accessed: 24 june 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9 3(33).26.