Legal Significance of Electronic Messages and Documents

  • Elena Anatolyevna KIRILLOVA Southwest State University, Kursk, Russian Federation
  • Varvara Vladimirovna BOGDAN Southwest State University, Kursk, Russian Federation
  • Mariya Vladimirovna GOLOVATSKAYA State University of Humanities and Social Studies, Moscow Region, Kolomna, Russian Federation
  • Tatyana Anatolyevna MELNICHENKO State University of Humanities and Social Studies, Moscow Region, Kolomna, Russian Federation
  • Vladimir Nikodimovich OGNEV State University of Humanities and Social Studies, Moscow Region, Kolomna, Russian Federation

Abstract

This article discusses the features and legal nature of legally significant electronic messages and documents. In the recent period, when the main part of business correspondence is carried out via the Internet, there is a need to ensure the legal significance and demonstrative strength of electronic documents and messages, as long as such documentation contains critical information. The main purpose of the study is to determine the legal nature of legally significant electronic messages and to determine the possibility of accepting electronic documents as evidence in court. When writing the article, the methods of collecting and studying single facts were used; generalization methods; methods of scientific abstraction; methods of cognition of regularities. The study has concluded that legally significant electronic messages (documents) are written notifications, including letters, that contain information of any legal significance for recipients and/or senders, if this is provided for in the contract, by law, by custom, committed through the Internet information and telecommunications network – electronic correspondence (e-mail), instant messages (ICQ, Skype, Jabber, WhatsApp, etc.), electronic copies of paper documents, etc. with observance of legal procedures. As a result of the analysis, a definition is given, the main features of electronic documents are highlighted, and it is suggested to use in international conventions and agreements the presumption of equalization of paper documents and electronic documents if they are drawn up in compliance with the requirements of law, contract and business practices. The proposal is to secure the provision that the e-mail address should be recognized as a simple electronic signature, and correspondence (subject to other conditions) should be recognized as the admissible evidence in court, which will simplify and systematize law enforcement practice.

References

[1] Ahmad, H.S., Bazlamit, I.M., and Ayoush, M.D. 2017. Investigation of Document Management Systems in Small Size Construction Companies in Jordan. Procedia Engineering, 182, 3-9.
[2] Barker, R.M., Cobb, A.T., and Karcher, J. 2009. The Legal Implications of Electronic Document Retention: Changing the Rules. Business Horizons, 52(2), 177-186.
[3] Case, A., and Richard, G.G. 2017. Memory Forensics: The Path Forward. Digital Investigation, 20, 23-33.
[4] Cristani, M., Bertolaso, A., Scannapieco, S., and Tomazzoli, C. 2018. Future Paradigms of Automated Processing of Business Documents. International Journal of Information Management, 40, 67-75.
[5] Hartig, A.J. 2016. Conceptual Blending in Legal Writing: Linking Definitions to Facts. English for Specific Purposes, 42, 66-75.
[6] James, J.I., and Gladyshev, P. 2016. A Survey of Mutual Legal Assistance Involving Digital Evidence. Digital Investigation, 18, 23-32.
[7] Julià-Barceló, R. 1999. A New Legal Framework for Electronic Contracts: The EU Electronic Commerce Proposal. Computer Law and Security Review, 15(3), 147-158.
[8] Julià-Barceló, R., and Vinje, T.C. 1998. Another Step towards a European Framework for Electronic Signatures: The Commission's Directive Proposal. Computer Law and Security Review, 14(5), 303-313.
[9] Kao, C.H., and Liu, S.T. 2013. Development of a Document. Management System for Private Cloud Environment. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 73, 424-429.
[10] Kearsley, A.J. 1999. Legal Admissibility of Evidence Held in Digital Form. Computer Law and Security Review, 15(3), 185-187.
[11] Kirillova, E.A., et al. 2017. Legally Significant Messages with Regard to the Development of the Internet. Revista Espacios, 38(48).
[12] Leng, T.K. 2014. E-Discovery of Electronically Stored Information in Commercial Litigation. Computer Law and Security Review, 30(2), 171-178.
[13] Lindner, R., and Riehm, U. 2009. Electronic Petitions and Institutional Modernization. International parliamentary E-Petition Systems in Comparative Perspective. JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 1(1), 1-11.
[14] Mason, S. 2013. Electronic Banking and How Courts Approach the Evidence. Computer Law and Security Review, 29(2), 144-151.
[15] Mason, S. 2014. Electronic Evidence: A Proposal to Reform the Presumption of Reliability and Hearsay. Computer Law and Security Review, 30(1), 80-84.
[16] Parcu, P.L., and Silvestri, V. 2014. Electronic Communications Regulation in Europe: An Overview of Past and Future Problems. Utilities Policy, 31, 246-255.
[17] Shipley, T.G., and Bowker, A. 2014. Chapter 5: Documenting Online Evidence. In Investigating Internet Crimes: 99-129. Syngress.
[18] Smith, A., and Clarke, R. 2000. Privacy in Electronic Media: Identification, Authentication and Anonymity in a Legal Context. Computer Law and Security Review, 16(2), 95-100.
[19] Solon, M., and Harper, P. 2004. Preparing Evidence for Court. Digital Investigation, 1(4), 279-283.
[20] Tauber, A., Kustor, P., and Karning, B. 2013. Cross-Border Certified Electronic Mailing: A European Perspective. Computer Law and Security Review, 29(1), 28-39.
[21] Veselá, L., and Radiměřský, M. 2014. The Development of Electronic Document Exchange. Procedia Economics and Finance, 12, 743-751.
[22] Wilson, J. 1997. Electronic Document Management: Electronic Documents. Computer Law and Security Review, 13(2), 124-125.
[23] Yao, Y.H., Trappey, A.J.C., and Ho, P.C. 2003. XML-Based ISO9000 Electronic Document Management System. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 19(4), 355-370.
Published
2018-12-23
How to Cite
KIRILLOVA, Elena Anatolyevna et al. Legal Significance of Electronic Messages and Documents. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 3(33), p. 997-1003, dec. 2018. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/2550>. Date accessed: 20 jan. 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9 3(33).25.