Siblings’ Dispute over Parents’ Transfer: Malaysian Case
Abstract
The main objective of this work is to examine disputes among children over parents’ transfer problem. This study utilizes qualitative approach in which semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten Land Office Officers. Data is coded to identify themes that contribute to this issue. Later, identified themes are then linked to develop a conceptual framework that explains the disputes among siblings over parents’ transfer. The result discovers two main themes; ‘Siblings do not get the transfer’ and ‘Transferred secretly’ that reflect the siblings’ dispute over parents’ transfer. There are three sub-themes which are ‘Factor(s)’, ‘Impact(s)’ and ‘Solution(s)’ which explain potential factors, impacts and solution for each theme.
References
[2] AbdulRashid, Rusnadewi, and Nor Hisyam Ahmad. 2013. Pengurusan Harta Melalui Hibah: Kepentingan Dan Manfaat Dari Pelbagai Aspek Untuk Kemajuan Ummah. Jurnal Hadhari 5 (1): 91–104.
[3] AbdulRashid, Rusnadewi, and Noor Inayah Yaakub. 2010. Hibah: Isu Pindah Milik Dan Pembatalan Hibah Hartanah Di Bawah Kanun Tanah Negara. Syariah Law Reports 1: 14–29.
[4] Alma’amun, et al. 2016. Motivations of Inter Vivos Transfers among Malaysian Muslims. Œconomica 12 (3): 149–62.
[5] Azhar, Alias, et al. 2014. Pengurusan Harta Dalam Islam: Perspektif Hibah Di Malaysia. Journal of Human Development and Communication 3: 115–28.
[6] Barro, R.J. 1974. Are Government Bonds Net Wealth? Journal of Political Economy 82 (6): 1095–1117.
[7] Becker, G.S. 1974. A Theory of Social Interactions. Journal of Political Economy 82 (6): 1063–93.
[8] Becker, G.S. 1976. Altruism, Egoism, and Genetic Fitness: Economics and Sociobiology. Journal of Economic Literature 14 (3): 817–26. doi:10.2307/2722629.
[9] Becker, G.S, and Nigel, T. 1979. An Equilibrium Theory of the Distribribution of Income and Intergenerational Mobility. Journal of Political Economy 87 (6): 1153–89.
[10] Bellamy, K., et al. 2016. Seeking to Understand: Using Generic Qualitative Research to Explore Access to Medicines and Pharmacy Services among Resettled Refugees. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 38 (3). Springer Netherlands: 671–75.
[11] Bernheim, B.D., et al. 1985. The Strategic Bequest Motive. Journal of Labor Economics 4 (3): 151–82.
[12] Brandt, M., and Deindl, C. 2013. Intergenerational Transfers to Adult Children in Europe: Do Social Policies Matter? Journal of Marriage and Family 75 (1): 235–51.
[13] Cachia, M., Millward, L. 2011. The Telephone Medium and Semi-Structured Interviews: A Complementaty Fit. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 6 (3): 265–77.
[14] Campbell, J.L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., and Pedersen, O.K. 2013. Coding in-Depth Semistructured Interviews: Problems of Unitzation and Intercoder Reliability and Agreement. Sociological Methods and Research 42 (3): 294–320.
[15] Chang, Yang-Ming, and Zijun, Luo. 2015. Endogenous Division Rules as a Family Constitution: Strategic Altruistic Transfers and Sibling Competition. Journal of Population Economics 28 (1): 173–94.
[16] Chang, Yang, Ming. 2007. Transfers and Bequests: A Portfolio Analysis in a Nash Game. Annals of Finance 3 (2): 277–95. doi:10.1007/s10436-006-0050-2.
[17] Constantinou, C.S., Georgiou, M., and Perdikogianni, M. 2017. A Comparative Method for Themes Saturation (CoMeTS) in Qualitative Interviews. Qualitative Research, 1–18.
[18] Cox, D. 1987. Motives for Private Income Transfers. Journal of Political Economy 95 (3): 508–46.
[19] Cox, D., and Rank, M.R. 1992. Inter-Vivos Transfers and Intergenerational Exchange. The Review of Economics and Statistics 74 (2): 305–14.
[20] Doody, O., and Noonan, M.. 2013. Preparing and Conducting Interviews to Collect Data. Nurse Researcher 20 (5): 28–32.
[21] Faith, R.L., Goff, B.L., and Tollison, R.D. 2008. Bequests, Sibling Rivalry, and Rent Seeking. Public Choice 136 (3–4): 397–409. doi:10.1007/s11127-008-9302-1.
[22] Gale, W.G, and Scholz, J.K. 1994. Intergenerational Transfers and the Accumulation of Wealth. Journal of Economic Persp 8 (4): 145–60.
[23] Gibson, Mhairi A, and Eshetu, Gurmu. 2011. Land Inheritance Establishes Sibling Competition for Marriage and Reproduction in Rural Ethiopia. 108 (6): 2200–2204. doi:10.1073/pnas.1010241108.
[24] Guan, S.S.A., and Fuligni, A.J. 2016. Changes in Parent, Sibling, and Peer Support during the Transition to Young Adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence 26 (2): 286–99.
[25] Guest, G., Bunce, A., and Johnson, L. 2006. How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Family Health International 18 (1): 59–82.
[26] Halvorsen, E., and Thoresen, T.O. 2011. Parents’ Desire to Make Equal Inter Vivos Transfers. CESifo Economic Studies 57 (1): 121–55.
[27] Harun, Noraida, Jady@Zaidi Hassim, and Noor ’Ashikin Hamid. 2013. Penipuan, Rasuah Dan Pencurian Maklumat Dalam Urus Niaga Tanah: Cabaran Dan Penyelesaian. Kanun 25 (2): 159–84.
[28] Horioka, C.Y. 2014. Are Americans and Indians More Altruistic than the Japanese and Chinese? Evidence from a New International Survey of Bequest Plans. Review of Economics of the Household 12 (3): 411–37. doi:10.1007/s11150-014-9252-y.
[29] Horioka, C.Y., et al. 2018. Why Do Children Take Care of Their Elderly Parents? Are the Japanese Any Different? International Economic Review 59 (1): 113–36. doi:10.1111/iere.12264.
[30] Ibrahim, B. 2017. Hibah (Gift Inter Vivos) by Parent in Favour of Some Children to the Exclusion of the Others under Islamic Law. Arab Law Quarterly 31 (1): 54–73.
[31] Jiang, Q., Li, X., and Feldman, M.W. 2015. Bequest Motives of Older People in Rural China: From the Perspective of Intergenerational Support. European Journal of Ageing 12 (2): 141–51.
[32] Jiménez-Martín, S., and Vilaplana Prieto, C. 2015. Informal Care Motivations and Intergenerational Transfers in European Countries. Health Economics 24 (1): 89–103.
[33] Kalmijn, M. 2013. How Mothers Allocate Support among Adult Children: Evidence from a Multiactor Survey. Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 68 (2): 268–77.
[34] McIntosh, M.J., and Morse, J.M. 2015. Situating and Constructing Diversity in Semi-Structured Interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research 2: 1–12.
[35] Md Razak, et al. 2015. The Awareness of Hibah as a Tool to Reduce Estate Planning Risk in Malaysia. International Journal of Economcis, Commerce and Management 3 (6): 1558–65.
[36] Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. 2018. Department of Director General of Lands and Mines. https://www.jkptg.gov.my/en.
[37] Nor Muhamad, Nasrul Hisyam. 2009. Elemen Qabd (Pindah Milikan) Dalam Hibah: Analisis Terhadap Keperluan Dan Pelaksanaannya Mengikut Perspektif Undang-Undang Islam. Jurnal Syariah 17 (2): 243–66.
[38] Nordblom, K., and Ohlsson, H. 2011. Bequests, Gifts, and Education: Links between Intergenerational Transfers. Empirical Economics 40 (2): 343–58.
[39] Norton, E.C, Nicholas, L.H., and Huang, S.S. 2013. Informal Care and Inter-Vivos Transfers: Results from the National Longitudinal Survey of Mature Women. B E J Econom Anal Policy 14 (2): 377–400.
[40] Norton, E.C., and Van Houtven, C.H. 2006. Inter-Vivos Transfers and Exchange. Southern Economic Journal 73 (1): 157–72.
[41] Olivera, J. 2016. The Division of Parental Transfers in Europe. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing.
[42] Paraskevaidis, P., and Andriotis, K. 2017. Altruism in Tourism: Social Exhange Theory vs Altruistic Surplus Phenomenon in Host Volunteering. Annals of Tourism Research 62: 26–37.
[43] Raad, R.J., and Guedes, G.R. 2015. Private Transfer Choices under Uncertainty in Human Capital. Revista Brasileira de Economia 69 (1): 105–24.
[44] Ralph, A.F., et al. 2017. Donor and Recipient Views on Their Relationship in Living Kidney Donation: Thematic Synthesis of Qualitatice Studies. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 69 (5). Elsevier Inc: 602–16. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.09.017.
[45] Stark, O. 1988. Altruism within the Family Reconsidered: Do Nice Guys Finish Last ? The American Economic Review 78 (5): 1034–45.
[46] Stark, O. 1998. Equal Bequests and Parental Altruism: Compatibility or Orthogonality? Economics Letters 60 (2): 167–71. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(98)00069-X.
[47] Taha, Mohd Marbawi, Jasni Sulong, and Mohd Nasir Ayub. 2015. Pemilikan Bersama Tanah Pusaka: Realiti, Masalah Dan Cabaran. ESTEEM Academic Journal 11 (2): 47–59.
[48] Taniguchi, H., and Kaufman, G. 2017. Filial Norms, Co-Residence, and Intergenerational Exchange in Japan. Social Science Quarterly, 1–18.
[49] Thomas, D.R. 2006. A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation 27 (2): 237–46.
[50] Xiying, M.A., and Teng, Z.L. 2017. The Evolving Gift-Giving Practices of Bicultural Consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing 34 (1).
[51] Yukutake, Norifumi, Shinichiro Iwata, and Takako Idee. 2015. Strategic Interaction between Inter Vivos Gifts and Housing Acquisition. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 35: 62–77.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.