The Assessment of the Intangible Resources of the Region as a Component of its Modernization Potential

  • Olga CHERNOVA Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-don, Russian Federation
  • Natal'ja KOSOLAPOVA Southern Federal University, Russian Federation
  • Ludmila MATVEEVA Southern Federal University, Russian Federation
  • Elena MIKHALKINA Southern Federal University, Russian Federation

Abstract

The aim of the article is to present the possibilities of the appliance of factor-approach in evaluation of usage of intangible resources of the region as an important part of its modernization potential. The analysis of theoretical approaches in investigating intangible resources of the region from the perspective of expressing the substantial connection of these resources with the regional modernization strategies provides an opportunity to mark out human, intellectual, informational, organizational and social resources. In the course of development of assessment tools for using the intangible resources of the region as components of its modernization potential two hypotheses were made and confirmed: (1) the proposed groups of intangible resources are possible to be measured by the aggregate of indicators and they can form a system of ‘intangible’ factors of the modernization level of the region economy evaluation; (2) region classification according to the level of intangible resources usage can be made by selected characteristics–indicators. Methods of factorial, correlation and cluster analysis were applied for hypotheses studies. The investigation revealed that all regions have one actual problem. This problem is development of institutional environment which, support commercialization of results of scientific researches. The authors arrived at conclusion about possibility to use developed tools in practice of regional strategizing for uncovering factors, which, form growth and limit modernization development. Also the developed tools can identify strong regions, which are well for realization projects in neo-industrialization sphere.

References

[1] Andriessen, D., Tissen, R. 2004. Weightless wealth. Determine the value of your company in the economy of intangible assets. Moscow: Olympus-Business, 304.
[2] Brousseau, E., Garrouste, R., Raynaud, E. 2011. Institutional changes: Alternative theories and consequences for institutional design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 79, 1-2, 192–222.
[3] Cabrita, M., Vaz, J. 2006. Intellectual Capital and Value Creation: Evidence from the Portuguese Banking Industry. Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 4, 1, 11-20.
[4] Daun, J.H. 2002. Intangible Assets. Bonn: Galileo Press, 152–154.
[5] Diebolt, C., Hippe, R. 2016. The long-run impact of human capital on innovation and economic development in the regions of Europe. Strasbourg. Working Papers of BETA, 2016-31. http://www.beta-umr7522.fr/productions/publications/2016/2016-31.pdf
[6] Dunteman, G.H. 1989. Principle Component Analysis. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 69, 167 – 187.
[7] Edvinsson, L., Malone, M. 1997. Intellectual Capital: Realizing your Company's True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower, Harper Business, New York, 225.
[8] Edvinsson, L. 2005. Corporate longitude. Navigation in the economy based on knowledge. Moscow: INFRA-M, 248.
[9] Everette, B.S., Landau, S., Leese, M., Stahl, D. 2011. Cluster Analysis. 5th ed. Wiley, 346.
[10] Gordon, I.R. 2015. Ambition, human capital acquisition and the metropolitan escalator. Published in Regional Studies, 49 (6), 1042-1055.
[11] Inozemtsev, V.L. 1995. The theory of post-economic social formation. M.: Academia, 195.
[12] Kok, A. 2007. Intellectual Capital Management as Part of Knowledge Management Initiatives at Institutions of Higher Learning. Electronic. Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 5, 2, 181 –192.
[13] Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P. 2007. A strategy maps. Transformation of intangible assets into tangible results. Moscow: Olympus-Business, 512.
[14] Lodde, S. 2008. Human Capital and Productivity Growth in Italian Regional Economies: A Sectoral Analysis. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali, vol. 116, 2, 211 – 233.
[15] Silin, J.P., Animitsa, E.G., Novikova, N.V. 2016. This is the new normality in the Russian economy: regional specifics. The Region's Economy, vol. 12, 3, 714-725. DOI: 10.17059/2016-3-9.
[16] Stewart, T. 1991. Brainpower. Fortune, 3. 42–60.
[17] Sveiby, K-E. 2001. A Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm To guide Strategy Formulation. http://www.sveiby.com/files/pdf/knowledgetheoryoffirmfin-draft.pdf
[18] Volchik, V.V., Kot, V.V. 2013. Institutional change in the peripheral regions of civil institutions. Terra Economicus, vol. 11, 4, 12 – 35.
[19] Yagupa, E.G. 2011. The development of the theory of intangible capital of the region. Russian Economic Internet magazine, 2, http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17856978
Published
2018-03-31
How to Cite
CHERNOVA, Olga et al. The Assessment of the Intangible Resources of the Region as a Component of its Modernization Potential. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 2, p. 442-451, mar. 2018. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/2463>. Date accessed: 25 june 2022.