Problematic Issues of the Administrative and Legal Status of the Police in the Baltic States (Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia)

  • Roman SHAPOVAL Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine
  • Iurii BYTIAK Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine
  • Nadiia KHRYSTYNCHENKO Ternopil National Economic University, Ukraine
  • Khrystyna SOLNTSEVA Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine

Abstract

This research article aims to analyze the essence of the notion ‘administrative and legal status of police bodiesʼ. Materials and methods include analysis of the target and structural and organizational elements of the administrative and legal status for each country; consideration of comments and proposals made by representatives of the public and experts, as well as problematic issues of the administrative and legal status of the police of countries: Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Results of the article are that the international community and the Council of Europe, based on the national experience of different countries, have developed a set of norms and recommendations in the field of crime prevention measures, the perception of which is an important condition for qualitative improvement of police service, implementing it in accordance with the principles of legality, humanism, respect for human rights and freedoms and the citizen. In the conclusion of the article, it should be noted that there is still room for improvement and harmonization of the administrative and legal status of police in the Baltic countries

References

[1] Adam, E., and Hughes, G. 2012. Public Safety Regimes: Negotiated Orders and Political Analysis in Criminology. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 12(4): 433–458.
[2] Basinska, B.A., Wiciak, I., Dåderman, A.M. 2014. Fatigue and Burnout in Police Officers: The Mediating Role of Emotions. Policing, 37(3): 665–680.
[3] Constitutions of European Countries. 2016. Vol. 3. Moscow: Norma.
[4] Constitutions of the CIS and Baltic Countries: Collection of documents. 2016. Moscow: Manuscript.
[5] Darke, S. 2011. The Enforcement Approach to Crime Prevention. Critical Social Policy, 31(3): 410–430.
[6] Dobrin, A. 2006. Professional and Community Policing: The Mayberry Model. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 13(1): 20–21.
[7] Heyer, G. 2013. Shape or Adapt: The Future of Policing. Salus Journal, 1(1): 41–54.
[8] Jones, T., and van Steden, R. 2013. Democratic Police Governance in Comparative Perspective: Reflections from England and Wales and the Netherlands. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 36(3): 561–576.
[9] Kerikmäe, T., Joamets, K., Pleps, J., Rodiņa, A., Berkmanas, T., Gruodytė, E. 2017. The Law of the Baltic States. Springer.
[10] Kriviņš, A. 2015. Towards Security and Safety: Police Efficiency across European Countries. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 5(1): 35–44.
[11] Law of the Republic of Latvia on the Protection of the State Border. 2000. V.Z. No.92-2848.
[12] Leukfeld, R., Veenstra, S., and Stol, W. 2013. High Volume Cyber Crime and the Organization of the Police: The Results of Two Empirical Studies in the Netherlands. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 7(1): 1–17.
[13] Mastrofski, S.D. 2006. Community Policing: A Sceptical View. In: Braga A.A. and Weisburd D., editors. Police Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 44–73.
[14] Mälksoo, M., Šešelgytė, M. 2013. Reinventing ‘New’ Europe: Baltic Perspectives on Transatlantic Security Reconfigurations. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 46(3): 397–406.
[15] Police Administration. 2010. (7th ed.). Elsevier.
[16] Scheider, M.C., Chapman, R., and Schapiro, A. 2009. Towards the Unification of Policing Innovations under Community Policing. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 32(3): 694–718.
[17] Sevryugov, V.E. 2009. Executive Power and Public Administration: Problems of Correlation. In: Volovich V. F., Barnashov A. M., Zuev V. M., editors. Legal Problems of Strengthening Russian Statehood. Tomsk: Publishing House of the Tomsk State University, pp. 6–12.
[18] Shearing, C., and Marks, M. 2011. Being a New Police in the Liquid 21st Century. Policing, 5(3): 210–218.
[19] Sootla, G., and Kattai, K. 2012. An Analysis of the Management, Organisation and Performance in the Administrative Field of the Ministry of the Interior’s Vice-Chancellor of the Policy of Law and Order, and Migration. Tallinn.
[20] Stone, C., and Travis, J. 2011. Toward a New Professionalism in Policing. New Perspectives in Policing. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice and Harvard Kennedy School.
[21] Suve, P., Selg, P., Sootla, G. 2015. Designing Multidimensional Policing Strategy and Organization: Towards A Synthesis of Professional and Community Police Models. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 8(1): 28−54.
[22] Suzuki, T. 2000. Baruto sangokushi [A History of Baltic States]. Tokyo: Tokai University Press.
[23] Uskova, A.S. 2002. Administrative and Legal Status of City and Regional Bodies of Internal Affairs (Candidate Thesis). Moscow.
[24] Virta, S. 2013. Governing Urban Security in Finland: Towards the ‘European Model’. European Journal of Criminology, 10(3): 341–353.
[25] Voruz, V. 2011. Politics in Foucault's Later Work: A Philosophy of Truth; or Reformism in Question. Theoretical Criminology, 15(1): 47–65.
[26] Yakhlef, S., Basic, G., Akerstrom, M. 2017. Policing Migration: Described and Observed Cooperation Experiences of Police and Border Guards in the Baltic Sea Area. Journal of Applied Security Research, 12(1): 117–140.
Published
2018-09-26
How to Cite
SHAPOVAL, Roman et al. Problematic Issues of the Administrative and Legal Status of the Police in the Baltic States (Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia). Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 295-306, sep. 2018. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/2315>. Date accessed: 25 feb. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9.1(31).35.