Legal Regulation of Educational Activities in Public Schools
Abstract
In the paper it notes: the quality of education is a series of systemic-social qualities and characteristics that define the system of education adopted requirements, social norms, the state educational standards. The authors believe that quality education depends on the quality of requirements (goals, standards and norms), quality resources (programs, personnel potential, contingent of entrants, logistics, Finance, etc.) and the quality of the educational process (scientific and educational activities, management, educational technology), which directly provide the training. The novelty of this work is that the country's accession to the Bologna process has resulted in the need for corresponding harmonization of the current quality assurance system of higher education to the commitments made. Quality assurance of higher education at the state level is achieved by development of normative-legal, organizational, methodological and other documents regulating the system of state quality control of education. The authors note that in the implementation of many activities that should contribute to quality assurance in higher education. The subject of the study is that the current quality assurance system (external expert evaluation of activities of higher education institutions) is now at the stage adaptation of the national system of quality assurance standards and guide lines for quality assurance in the European higher educatio narea. In particular, the formation of the monitoring system and definition of rating of higher educational institutions, which in the assessment activities of the University focuses on international indicators (indicators). Even today, some universities are turning to international accreditation agencies. The study's findings is that the system of legal acts regulating the functioning of higher education, while maintaining a certain level of state regulation of activities in the field of higher education, provides an opportunity to ensure greater compliance with the professional qualification level of training of specialists for the requirements of the social division of labor and mobility system of training of specialists on the labor market. At the same time, the analysis of normative-legal acts on higher education shows that, despite the progressive legal instruments adopted in recent years aimed at the development of the education system, they still characterized by inconsistency, ambiguity, and the impossibility of monitoring the implementation of certain provisions. For the solution of problems a rising in the process of quality management of higher education, the need for further improvement and development framework. Important measure to improve the quality of education and management is the implementation of quality management systems in higher education institutions.
References
[2] Boshuizen, H.P.A. 2016. Teaching as regulation and dealing with complexity. Instructional Science 44: 311-314. Doi: 10.1007 / s11251-016-9377-x.
[3] Erofeeva, N.E., Melekessov, G.A., Chikova, I.V. 2016. Monitoring of quality as an instrument for regulating interaction between a teacher and a student at a university. The successes of modern science and education 10: 67-71.
[4] Esdar, W., Gorges, J., and Wild, E. 2016. The role of basic need for junior academics' goal conflicts and teaching motivation. Higher Education, 72: 175-190. Doi: 10.1007 / s10734-015-9944-0.
[5] Federal Law No. 273-FZ of December 29, 2012 (as amended on May 1, 2017) ʼOn Education in the Russian Federationʼ. Collection of legislation of the Russian Federation, 31.12.2012, N 53 (Part 1), art. 7598.
[6] Federal Law No. 273-FZ of December 29, 2012 (as amended on May 1, 2017, as amended on July 5, 2017) ʼOn Education in the Russian Federationʼ. Collection of legislation of the Russian Federation, 31.12.2012, N 53 (Part 1), art. 7598.
[7] Fossey, R. 2007. University Oversight of Professors' Teaching Activities: A Professor's Academic Freedom Does Not Mean Freedom From Institutional Regulation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 19: 159-173. Doi: 10.1007 / s11092-007-9043-6,
[8] Kramarski, B., and Kohen, Z. 2017. Promoting preservice teachers' dual self-regulation roles as learners and as teachers: effects of generic vs. specific prompts. Metacognition and Learning, 12: 157-191. Doi: 10.1007 / s11409-016-9164-8.
[9] Kulikov, M.V. 2017. Problems of the legal regulation of works created in the exercise of labor duties by teachers of higher education educational institutions. In the collection: Bulletin of a young scientist of the Kuzbass Institute, a collection of scientific articles. Novokuznetsk.
[10] Lavrova, O.V. 2016. Legal regulation of the work of teachers of higher education. New science: Theoretical and practical view 5-2: 256-258.
[11] Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Nevgi, A., and Trigwell, K. 2011. Regulation of university teaching. Instructional Science 39: 483-495. Doi: 10.1007 / s11251-010-9141-6.
[12] Luchsheva, L.V. 2016. Anticorruption ethics as a means of regulating the conflict of interests between a teacher and a student. Bulletin of Economics, Law and Sociology 4: 232-235.
[13] Müller, K., Prenzel, M., Seidel, T., Schiepe-Tiska, A. and Kjærnsli, M. 2016. Science Teaching and Learning in Schools: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations for Investigating Classroom-Level Processes. In Kuger, S., Klieme, E., Jude, N. and Kaplan D. (Eds.), Assessing Contexts of Learning: An International Perspective. Springer International Publishing.
[14] Novakovskaya, A.V. 2016. On individual problems of legal regulation of labor relations of teachers of higher education. Horizons of the economy 6: 24-28.
[15] Schünemann, N., Spörer, N., Völlinger, V.A. and Brunstein, J.C. 2017. Peer feedback mediates the impact of self-regulation. Instructional Science 45: 395–415. Doi: 10.1007 / s11251-017-9409-1.
[16] Smit, R., Bachmann, P., Blum, V., Birri, T., and Hess, K. 2017. Effects of a heading for mathematical reasoning on teaching and learning in primary school. Instructional Science. Doi: 10.1007 / s11251-017-9416-2.
[17] Terlouw, C., and Pilot, A. 1990. Teaching Problem Solving in Higher Education: From Field Regulation to Self-Regulation. In: Pieters, J. M., Breuer, K. and Simons, P.R.-J. (Eds.) Learning Environments: Contributions from Dutch and German Research. Springer Berlin Heidelberg Publishing.
[18] The Labor Code of the Russian Federation of December 30, 2001 No. 197-FZ (as amended on June 18, 2017). Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation ʼ, 07.01.2002, N 1 (Part 1), Article 3.
[19] Torrente, C., Rivers, S.E., and Brackett, M.A. 2016. Teaching Emotional Intelligence in Schools: An Evidence-Based Approach. In: Lipnevich, A. A, Preckel, F. and Roberts, R. D. (Eds.), Psychosocial Skills and School Systems in the 21st Century: Theory, Research, and Practice. Springer International Publishing.
[20] Wang, J.C.K., Ng, B.L.L., Liu, W.C., and Ryan, R.M. 2016. Can Autonomy-Supportive in Teaching Improve Students' Self-Regulation and Performance? In: Liu, W.C., Wang, J.C.K. and Ryan, R.M. (Eds.), Building Autonomous Learners: Perspectives from Research and Practice using Self-Determination Theory. Springer Singapore Publishing.
[21] Zhelnovach, M.V. 2016. Risks of the project monitoring the quality of working life of university teachers. In the collection: Scientific and educational space: development perspectives Collected materials of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference: in 2 volumes.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.