Formula of Investment Success: Comparative Analysis of Legislation for Investment Activities Development

  • Assel M. MURZAGALIYEVA Department of General Legal Sciences, Academy of Law Enforcement Authorities at the General Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan Kosshy, Republic of Kazakhstan

Abstract

Investments are an integral part of the modern economy, as they contribute to making a profit and achieving a positive effect. Therefore, the author chose this topic for study. The main purpose of the work is to determine the investment success, using the example of development of investment activities of the United States and Japan. The author found that 74% of all direct foreign investment of the United States is investment in developed countries, where you can get a good profit. First of all, American business invests in the Netherlands, Britain, Luxembourg, Canada, Ireland. Having studied the issue of investment success, the author derived a formula that promotes development. It includes liberal legislation, a government collegial body, additional mechanisms, free economic zones, access to the global market and internal potential. These components contribute to the development of investment activities.

References

[1] Caporin, M., Kolokolov, A., and RenĂ², R. 2017. Systemic co-jumps. Journal of Financial Economics 126(3): 563-591.
[2] Chatterjee, A. 2017. Endogenous comparative advantage, gains from trade and symmetry-breaking. Journal of International Economics 109. 102-115.
[3] Haase, M., Zimmermann, Y.S., and Zimmermann, H. 2017. Commodity Returns and Their Volatility in Relation to Speculation: A Consistent Empirical Approach. The Journal of Alternative Investments 20 (2): 76-91.
[4] Harding, D., and Pagan, A. 2017. The Econometric Analysis of Recurrent Events in Macroeconomics and Finance (a review). Financial Analysts Journal 73(3): 85-105.
[5] Korinek, A. 2018. Regulating capital flows to emerging markets: An externality view. Journal of International Economics 111: 61-80.
[6] Lee, Y.-H., and Mo, W.-S. 2016. Analysis of price discovery and non-linear dynamics between volatility index and volatility index futures. Investment Analysts Journal 45(3): 163-176.
[7] Lerner, J., Schoar, A., Sokolinski, S., and Wilson, K. 2018. The globalization of angel investments: Evidence across countries. Journal of Financial Economics 127(1): 1-20.
[8] Marchuk, T., Ryzhakov, D., Ryzhakova, G., Stetsenko, S. 2017. Identification of the basic elements of the innovation-analytical platform for energy efficiency in project financing. Investment Management and Financial Innovations 14(4): 12-20.
[9] Masumova, N.R., and Mamadova, N.R. 2015. Features of formation of the investment climate in Turkey. World and National Economy 3 (34): 33-39.
[10] Renkema, J., van den Goorbergh, R., and Rivas, C.G. 2017. RATZ IRR: Performance Measurement in the Absence of Cash Flow Data. The Journal of Alternative Investments 20(2): 51-63.
[11] World Investment Report. 2017. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2017_en.pdf.
[12] Zaremba, A., and Grobelny, P. 2017. Merger imbalance and returns in international equity markets. Investment Analysts Journal 46(2): 117-131.
Published
2018-09-23
How to Cite
MURZAGALIYEVA, Assel M.. Formula of Investment Success: Comparative Analysis of Legislation for Investment Activities Development. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 159-166, sep. 2018. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/2299>. Date accessed: 19 apr. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9.1(31).21.