Sugar Price Policy and Indonesia’s Trade Balance

  • Agnes Quartina PUDJIASTUTI Department of Agribusiness, Tribhuwana Tunggadewi University, Malang, Indonesia
  • Esther KEMBAUW Department of Agribusiness, Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia

Abstract

Sugar price policy always directed at conditions in which supply is equal to demand. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of increase in sugar prices on Indonesia’s trade balance. Evaluation was done by using Tables I-O and SAM Indonesia in 2008 to developed Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model. Indonesian economy were aggregated into 23 sectors with 8 households and 3 primary input. An increase in sugar prices of Indonesia have an impact on domestic output, exports, imports and trade balance. In agricultural sector, domestic output and imports increased, exports dropped, but Indonesian trade balance was still surplus. While the industrial and service sectors, domestic output and exports dropped, as well as imports increased, but the trade balance was deficit. Sugar imports even increased by 9.09%. It needs to watch out by the government because it could lead to a deficit in the trade balance.

References

[1] Akpan, S.B., Udo, U.J., and Essien, UA. 2011. Influence of Firm Related Factors and Industrial Policy Regime on Technology Based Capacity Utilization in Sugar Industry in Nigeria. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 3 (3).
[2] Aksoy, M.A., and Bernard, M.H. 2010. Food Prices and Rural Poverty. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. World Bank. Washington D.C.
[3] Amir, H. 2012. Economic Impact Analysis of the 2012 Indonesia Mineral-Export Tax Policy: A CGE Approach. The International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, 8 (1).
[4] Armington, P.A.A. 1969. Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers 16 (5): 159-78.
[5] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2010. Sistem Neraca Sosial Ekonomi Indonesia 2008. Jakarta: BPS.
[6] Bahta, Y.T. 2014. The Impact of International Oil Price Increase on the Economy of Free State Province of South Africa. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics, 2 (1): 41-50.
[7] Buehrer, T., and Mauro, F.D. 1995. Computable General Equilibrium Model as Tools for Policy Analysis in Developing Countries: Some Basic Principles and an Empirical Application. Rome: Banca D’talia.
[8] Choi, S.C.T.A. 2014. Complementarity Approach to Solving Computable General Equilibrium Models. Springer Science+Business Media New York. ISSN: 0931-5195.
[9] Hosoe, N., Kenji Gasawa dan Hideo Hashimoto. 2010.Textbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modelling: Programming and Simulations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
[10] Ishchukova, N., and Smutka, L. 2013. Comparative Advantage: Products Mapping of the Russian Agricultural Exports. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 5 (3).
[11] KPPURI. 2010. Position Paper Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Republik Indonesia Terhadap Kebijakan dalam Industri Gula.
[12] Křístková, Z., and Ratinger, T. 2013. Modelling the Efficiency of Agri-Environmental Payments to Czech Agriculture in a CGE Framework Incorporating Public Goods Approach. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 5 (2).ISSN 1804-1930.
[13] Leith, J., Porter, C., and Warr, P. 2003. Poverty and Social Impact Analysis: Indonesia Rice Tariff. SMERU Institute.
[14] Lofgren, H., Harris, R.L., and Robinson, S. 2002. A Standard Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model in GAMS. Microcomputers in Policy Research. International Food Policy Research Institute.
[15] Markusen, J., and Rutherford, T. 2004. MPSGE: A User’s Guide. Department of Economics University of Colorado. Lecture Notes Prepare for the UNSW Workshop, February 24-27.
[16] Oktaviani, R., and Asmarantaka, R.W. 2010. Department of Economics and Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Economics and Management, Bogor Agricultural University, Indonesia. Contributed Paper at the Thirteen Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis United Nations Conference Centre, Bangkok, Thailand, June 9-11.
[17] Pudjiastuti, A.Q., Anindita, R., Hanani, N., and Kaluge, D. Effects of Sugar Price Increase in Indonesia. Studia UBB, OECONOMICA, 58 (1): 28-39.
[18] Pudjiastuti, A.Q., Anindita, R., Hanani, N., and Kaluge, D. 2013. Changes Effect of Sugar Import Tariff in Indonesia. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 3(15).
[19] Pudjiastuti, A.Q. 2014.Perubahan Neraca Perdagangan Indonesia Sebagai Akibat Penghapusan Tarif Impor Gula. Agriekonomika, 3 (2).
[20] Punt, C., Pauw, K., van Schoor, M., Gilimani, B., and Rantho, L.A. 2005. Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Analysis of the Impact of an Oil Price Increase in South Africa. PROVIDE Working Paper. South Africa.
[21] Resosudarmo, B.P., Arief A.Y., Djoni Hartono, dan Ditya A. Nurdianto. 2009. Implementation of the IRCGE Model for Planning: IRSA-INDONESIA 5 (Inter Regional System of Analysis for Indonesia in 5 regions. Canberra: The Australia National University.
[22] Rezbova, R., Belova, A., and Skubna, O. 2013. Sugar beet production in the European Union and their future trends. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 5 (4).
[23] Sadoulet, E., and A. de Janvry. 1995. Quantitative Development Policy Analysis. London: The Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN: 0-80180-4782-6.
[24] Svatoš, M., Maitah, M., and Belova, A. 2013. World Sugar Market – Basic Development Trends and Tendencies. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 5 (2).
[25] Woods-Early, Y.S. 2006. Sugar Export Price and Import Tariff Reforms: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Mauritius. Dissertation. University of Pittsburgh.
[26] Yeah, K.L., Yanogida, J.F., and Yamauchi, H. 1994. Evaluation of External Market Effects and Government Intervention in Malaysia’s Agricultural Sector: A Computable General Equilibrium Framework. Agricultural Economics.
Published
2018-09-05
How to Cite
PUDJIASTUTI, Agnes Quartina; KEMBAUW, Esther. Sugar Price Policy and Indonesia’s Trade Balance. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 8, p. 2540-2548, sep. 2018. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/2222>. Date accessed: 25 june 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v8.8(30).26.