Tendencies of Interaction between Russian Universities and Companies Implementing Innovative Development Programs. Reproductive Aspects

  • Vladimir PASTUKHOV Russian Technology Agency, Russia
  • Nikolay KLIMAN Russian Technology Agency, Russia
  • Dmitry ALEKSEEV Russian Technology Agency, Russia


In this article, key indicators and trends of global innovative development are analyzed, and the role of the research and development sector in these processes is revealed. Attention is paid to the consideration of mechanisms of interaction between universities and state companies, concrete measures and steps of economic policy. The authors of the article analyze the real experience of the Russian economy at the present time. Based on the collected data on the total volume of R&D, revenues and the number of patents, regression models were constructed to determine the relationship between the named indicators. Based on the results of the analysis, recommendations on improving economic policy aimed at ensuring the achievement of goals and justifying the use of mechanisms of ‘compulsion to innovate’ in state companies are formulated.


[1] Abdrakhmanova, G.I., Gorodnikova, N.V., and Goknberg, L.M. 2015. Science. Innovations. Information society: 2015: short statistical collection. Moscow: NIU HSE.
[2] Basic Statistics on Research and Development Institutions. 2016. China Statistical Yearbook. URL: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2016/html/2002EN.jpg.
[3] Basic Statistics on Scientific and Technological Activities. 2016. China Statistical Yearbook 2016. URL: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2016/html/2001EN.jpg, (Accesed 01.06.2017).
[4] Basic Statistics on Science and Technology Activities of Industrial Enterprises above Designated Size. 2016. China Statistical Yearbook. URL: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2016/html/2004EN.jpg.
[5] Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., and Wunsch-Vincent, S. (eds.). 2016. The Global Innovation Index 2016 Winning with Global Innovation (WIPO). URL: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/userfiles/file/reportpdf/gii-full-report-2016-v1.pdf.
[6] Esfahani, H.S., and Ramirez, M.T. 2003. Institutions, Infrastructure and Economic Growth. Journal of Development Economics, 70(2): 443-477.
[7] Gershman, M.A. 2013. Innovative development programs for companies with state participation: first results. Foresight, 7(1): 29-43.
[8] Gorodnikova, N.V., Gokhberg, L.M., and Ditkovsky, K.A. 2016. Indicators of Science: 2016: Statistical Digest. Moscow: NIU HSE.
[9] Klyucharyov, G.A. 2015. About ‘training organizations’ and corporate education in the innovative context. Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference ‘Society and Sociology in Contemporary Russia’ (136-146). Vologda: ISEDT RAS.
[10] Kokueva, V.V., and Tsertseil, Yu.S. 2016. Evaluation of innovation activity of enterprises in Russia and the identification of factors of influence. Collection of articles of the winners of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference: Modern economy: current issues, achievements and innovations (129-133). Penza: MCSN ‘ScienceandEducation’.
[11] Latyshev, I.O., and Akhmetshin, E.M. 2015. Methodological approaches to analyzing the indicators of human capital management in the interests of innovation development of enterprise. International Business Management, 9(6): 1565-1570
[12] Mau, V.A., and Ulyukaev, A.V. 2015. From economic crisis to economic growth or how stop to turn up crisis into stagnation. Economic questions, 4: 5-9.
[13] Morris, M.H., and Jones, F.F. 1999. Entrepreneurship in established organizations: The case of the public sector. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 24(1): 71-91.
[14] Nikitin, G.S. 2016. Key instruments of the new industrial policy of the Russian Federation. Effective anti-crisis management, 1: 74-79.
[15] OECD. 2016a. Gross domestic expenditure on R-D by sector of performance and source of funds. URL: http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=GERD_FUNDS.
[16] OECD. 2016b. Main Science and Technology Indicators Database. URL: http://www.oecd.org/sti/msti.htm.
[17] Osadchy, E.A., and Akhmetshin, E.M. 2015. The intellectual capital importance and the role of organizations against the back drop of a crisis: Innovation vector. Social Sciences (Pakistan), 10(6): 1013-1020.
[18] Oslo Manual. 2010. Recommendations for the collection and analysis of data on innovation. Moscow: CSRS.
[19] Pastukhov, V., Kliman, N., and Alekseev, D. 2016. Factors and Trends of Engineering Centers Development in the Network Structure of Innovations Reproduction. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(18): 11659-11674.
[20] PwC’s Strategy & a global team. 2017. URL: http://www.strategyand.pwc.com/innovation1000#GlobalKeyFindingsTabs3.
[21] Rajiv, Sh., Gao, Zh., and Mittal, H. 2015. Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and the Economy in the US, China, and India: Historical Perspectives and Future Trends. New York: Academic Press.
[22] Russia and China: Innovation and Entrepreneurship 2016. 2016. Analytical report. URL: http://sk.ru/news/m/wiki/17058/download.aspx.
[23] World Bank. 2010. The Innovation Policy: A Guide for Developing Countries. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
[24] World Bank. 2015. World Development Indicators: Gross Domestic Product 2015. URL: http://www.worldbank.org/.
[25] Yew, L.K. 2016. From Third World to First. Views and Believes of Lee Kuan Yew. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber.
How to Cite
PASTUKHOV, Vladimir; KLIMAN, Nikolay; ALEKSEEV, Dmitry. Tendencies of Interaction between Russian Universities and Companies Implementing Innovative Development Programs. Reproductive Aspects. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 8, p. 2519-2532, sep. 2018. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/2217>. Date accessed: 17 jan. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v8.8(30).24.