Possibilities of the Implementation of Foreign Experience of Value Policy in the Sphere of Interethnic Relations on Russian Conditions
Abstract
Insufficient effectiveness of the administrative model of the national policy in Russian society implies a transition to new paradigmatic grounds for management practices in the field of interethnic relations, including taking into account the possibility of the implementation of foreign experience of value policy. The article reveals the difficulties, possibilities and prospects for the implementation of the experience of politics of values in the US and FRG in Russian conditions. It is concluded that value policy allows you to get rid of the administrative syndrome in Russian society, overcome the limitations of only the legal ʽmechanismsʽ for regulating inter-ethnic relations and move on to the communicative model of national politics.
References
[2] Alford, J., and Hughes, O. 2008. Public Value Pragmatism as the Next Phase of Public Management. American Review of Public Administration, 38(2): 130-148.
[3] Caldwell, C. 2009. Reflections on the revolutions in Europe: Immigration, Islam, and the West. London: Allen Lane.
[4] Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 1666. (2012). The strategy of the state national policy of the Russian Federation for the period until 2025. URL: http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/36512.
[5] Denisova, G.S. 2016. The Value Policy of the Russian Federation in the Sphere of Harmonization of Interethnic Relations. Socio-Humanitarian Knowledge, 7: 164-170.
[6] Drobizheva, L.M. 2012. Russian identity and consent in interethnic relations: the experience of 20 years of reforms. Bulletin of the Russian Nation, 4-5: 17-25.
[7] Drobizheva, L.M. 2017. All-Russian identity and the level of interethnic harmony as a reflection of the vector of consolidation processes. Sociological research, 1: 35-36.
[8] Granin, Yu.D. 2017. From self-awareness to identity. The project ʽThe Russian Nationʽ should be completed. Independent paper. URL: http://www.ng.ru/ideas/2017-03-29/11_6960_nacia.html.
[9] Hollinger, P. 2005. Post-ethnic America: Beyond multiculturalism. New York: Basic Books.
[10] Ilyinskaya, S.G. 2007. Tolerance as a principle of the political action: history, theory, practice. Moscow: Praxis.
[11] Kelly, G., Mulgan, G., and Muers, S. 2004. Creating Public Value. An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform. London: Cabinet Office Strategy Unit.
[12] Kilburn, W.H. 2009. Personal Values and Public Opinion. Social Science Quarterly, 90(4): 868-885.
[13] Korovnikova, N.A. 2013. Axiological aspects of public administration. In: Russia: Trends and Prospects for Development: Yearbook. Issue. 8 (part 2) (68-72). Moscow: INION RAS.
[14] Kuzivanova, O.Y. 2014. National Policy of Russia: Institutional Dimension. Ethnosocium and Interethnic Culture, 6(72): 111-113.
[15] Lubsky, A.V. 2005. Conflictogenic factors in the South of Russia: Research methodology and social realities. Rostov-on-Don:The Publishing House of the Scientific and Technical Center of the Higher School of Economics.
[16] Lubsky, A.V. 2016. Mental programs and models of social behavior in Russian society: monograph. Rostov-on-Don:The Foundation for Science and Education.
[17] Lubsky, A.V. 2017. Civil patriotism: on the compatibility of patriotism and civicism in Russian society. Humanitarian of the South of Russia, 1: 42-59.
[18] Lubsky, A., and Posukhova, O. 2016. Projects of national construction and models of national integration in Russia. Authority, 8: 39-47.
[19] Meeting of the Council on Interethnic Relations. (2016). URL: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/53173
[20] Moore, M. 1995. Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[21] Morell, K. 2009. Governance and the Public Good. Public Administration, 87(3): 538-556.
[22] Osadchy, E.A., and Akhmetshin, E.M. 2015. The intellectual capital importance and the role of organizations against the backdrop of a crisis: Innovation vector. Social Sciences (Pakistan), 10(6): 1013-1020.
[23] Patrick, D., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., and Tinkler, J. 2006. New Public Management Is Dead – Long Live Digital-Era Governanc. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3): 467-494.
[24] Pridatko, E.P. 2011. Migration Policy and Interethnic Relations between the US and Canada as Important Components of Multiculturalism. Paper of P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University, 2: 45-48.
[25] Popkov, Y.V. 2015. Multiculturalism, interculturalism, internationalization in socio-cultural dynamics. Siberian philosophical journal, 13(2): 48-49.
[26] Popov, F.A. 2012. Geography of secessionism in the modern world. Moscow: A new chronograph.
[27] Posukhova, O.Y., Serikov, A.V., and Chernous, V.V. 2015. Politics of multiculturalism in the United States: assessing the effectiveness and feasibility of implementation in the Russian context. Humanities, Socio-Economic and Social Sciences, 11: 146-152.
[28] Robertson, R. 1995. Glocalization: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity. In: Global Modernities (25-44). London: Sage Publications.
[29] Robertson, R., and Knondker, H. 1999. Discourses of globalization: Preliminary considerations. International Sociaology, 13(1): 25-40.
[30] Rhodes, R., and Wanna, J. 2007. The Limits to Public Value, or Rescuing Responsible from the Platonic Guardians. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(4): 406-421.
[31] Rudiger, A., and Spenser, S. 2003. Social Integration of Migration and Ethnic Minotities. Policies to Combat Diskrimination. Conference Joinly Organized by The European Commission and the OECD. 21-21 January. Brussels.
[32] Sanneh, L. 2008. Disciples of all Nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.
[33] Shabaev, Y.P., and Sadokhin, A.P. 2014. Strategic Challenges and Local Modifications in the Implementation of the State National Policy of the Russian Federation. Bulletin of the Russian Nation, 6: 223-246.
[34] Stoker, G. 2006. Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance. American Review of Public Administration, 36(2): 41-57.
[35] Tinkuev, M.N. 2012. Formation and regulation of interethnic relations: on the example of the Republic of Dagestan. Ph.D abstract. Moscow.
[36] Volkov, Y.G. (ed.) 2015. Value policy and institutional practices in the field of interethnic relations in economically developed countries with a complex ethno-cultural structure: Monograph. Rostov on Don:Fund of science and education.
[37] Volkov, Y.G., Denisova, G.S., and Lubsky, A.V. 2016. The development of ethnic cultures as an instrument of national policy in the South of Russia: based on a sociological survey. Socio-humanitarian knowledge, 12: 9-18.
[38] Volkova, A.V. 2013. Public values and the system of public administration in Russia. St. Peterburg:SPbU.
[39] Vinogradova, E.A., and Nosova, N.P. 2016. Realization of modern national policy in the Russian Federation: problems and contradictions. Academy, 6(9): 106-109.
[40] Vyalykh, N.A. 2016. National policy in modern Russia as a subject of scientific research. Humanitarian of the South of Russia, 6: 159-168.
[41] Witesman, E., and Walters, L. 2014. Public Service values: a new approach to the study of motivation in the public sphere Public Administration. Public Administration, 92(2): 375-405.
[42] Zorin, V.Y. 2013. The Strategy of the State National Policy of the Russian Federation: Tradition and New Approaches to Strengthening the Unity of the Multinational People of Russia (the Russian Nation). Vestnik BIST, 5(21): 55-64.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.