Modern Practice of ʽManual Managementʽ in Russian Governmental and Municipal Authority
Abstract
Objectives: to define content and structure of ʽmanual managementʽ term; to analyze motives, legal framework, legitimacy, forms and methods of using ʽmanual proceduresʽ in the management processes in entities of governmental and municipal authority in the Russian Federation; to explore foreign experience in terms of ʽmanual managementʽ; to define ratios between ʽsystemʽ and ʽmanualʽ methods in Russian management practice and to evaluate the degree of their influence on social and economic life of modern Russian society. The methodological base of the research is comprised with methods and scientific cognition techniques widely used in research practice, namely: methods of deduction and induction, generalization, observation, forecasting, scientific abstraction techniques, system analysis, as well as classification and grouping instruments, elements of cross-industry and comparative historical analysis; expert estimations. Results of the research: authors have formulated own definition of ʽmanual managementʽ term; revealed reasons, conditions and motives for its applying by Russian bodies of governmental and municipal authority; described the most spread methods of its application and factors concerning increase of cases of refuse to use system procedures in modern practice of governmental and municipal management. Scientific novelty: considering the practice of Russian governmental and municipal management authors focus on the lately applied procedures of its exercising, such as creation of parallel management structures, transition to instruments of directive instructions, etc. On the basis of conducted analysis of activity performed by bodies of governmental and municipal authority in constituent of the Russian Federation authors have revealed ratio between ʽmanualʽ and ʽsystemʽ procedures used in management process, formulated definition of ʽmanual managementʽ term, disclosed conditions and motives for its application and also made a conclusion stating the main reasons for applying and extending ʽmanual managementʽ practice are the incompleteness and inconsistency of applicable Russian legislation, which on the one hand cannot reflect to the full extent the fundamental changes in social and economic spheres that took place in Russia within the recent decades, and on the other hand is far not always able to sufficiently regulate relationships between object and subject in the process of governmental and municipal management. Practical relevance: as a result of the research authors forecast the probable consequences of outlined tendency for extension of practice of ʽmanual managementʽ in bodies of governmental and municipal authority in both - in the medium and the longer term.
References
[2] Alafuzov, I.G. 2015. Social support as the key factor of efficiency of anti-recessionary measures perfomed by the government of the RF. Herald of economy, right and sociology, 1: 13-15.
[3] Atamanchuk, G.V. 2010. Theory of governmental management: course of lectures. Omega-L. Moskow.
[4] Avchenko, V. 2013. Full APEC. Expert Online. http://expert.ru/2013/09/9/polnyij-ates/.
[5] Azrailyan, A.N. et al. 2010. Big economic dictionary. 7th edition. Institute of new economy. Moskow.
[6] Bataykin, P.A. 2014. Development and realization of behavioral paradigm of regulation of modern Russian economy. Economy. Moskow.
[7] Bataykin, P.A. 2012. Direction of strutural shifts in national economy. Herald of economy, right and sociology, 4: 20-22.
[8] Bataykin, P.A., Khasanova, A.Sh., Shlychkov, V.V., Toumashev, A.R., Toumasheva, M.V. 2016. Economic Growth in the Conditions of Resource Constraints: Ordinal Approach to Optimization of Macroeconomic Production Structure. Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 3(41): 521-531.
[9] Decree of the President of the RF No. 1199. 2012. Of evaluation of performance of activity of bodies of executive authority in constituents of the Russian Federation. Collection of legislation of the Russian Federation, No. 35: Article 4774.
[10] Fayol, H. 1999. Administration industrielle et generale. Dunod. Parish.
[11] Follett, M.P. 1918. The New State. Group organization the solution of popular government. Longman Green and Co. London.
[12] Grigoriev, R.A., Kramin, M.V., Kramin, T.V., Timiryasova, A.V. 2015. Inequality of income distribution and economic growth in regions of Russia within post-crisis period. Region economy, 3(43): 102-113.
[13] Gordeev, I. 2007. That’s him indeed. Time of news. http://www.vremya.ru/2007/192/4/189565.html
[14] Gorschkow, M. 2010. Soziale und politische Wandlungen im Transformationsland Russland. Trendbericht Russland: Bilanz des letzten Jahrzehnts (1998-2008) und Perspektiven: ein Sammelband. Rosspjen. Moscow.
[15] Isaev, A.B., Kadyshev, E.N. 2012. Formation of actual principles of governmental management and regulation of regional economy. Economic systems management: electronic scientific journal, 2(38): 5-7.
[16] Khasanova, A.S., Vedin, N.V. 2014. Revisited formation of new economic paradigm. Herald of economy, right and sociology, 4: 106-111.
[17] King, S.D. 2010. Losing control. The emerging threats to western prosperity. Yale University Press. London.
[18] Kotz, D.M., Weir, F. 2007. Russia’s Path from Gorbachev to Putin. The Demise of the Soviet System and the New Russia. Routledge. New York.
[19] Kuznetsova, O.V. 2015. Regional policy of Russia: 20 year of reforms and new opportunities. Book house ʽLibrokomʽ. Moskow.
[20] Maximov, D.A. Khalikov, M.A. 2016. Prospects of institutional approach to production corporation assets assessment. Actual Problems of Economics, 183(9): 16-25.
[21] North, D.C. 1993. Economic Performance through Time. Lecture to the memory of Alfred Nobel. http://nobelprize.org/economics/laureates/1993/north-lecture.html
[22] Polunin, A. 2016. Gref is intent to start Perestroika 2.0. If the reform of governmental management will help to improve the economy of th RF? http://svpressa.ru/economy/article/144471/
[23] Prokhorov, A.P. 2014. Russian management model. 3rd edition. Publishing house - Studio of Artemiy Lebedev. Moskow.
[24] Resolution adopted by the general assembly 50/225 ʽPublic administration and developmentʽ http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/ RES/50/225
[25] Rjabow, A. 2010. Das Scheitern der demokratischen Transformation Russlands: war es unausweichlich? Trendbericht Russland: Bilanz des letzten Jahrzehnts (1998-2008) und Perspektiven: ein Sammelband. Rosspjen. Moscow.
[26] Seregin, V., Shtykina, A., Tkachev, I., Milykova, Y. 2016. Why courts admitted constructions demolished by Moscow legal. RBK. http://www.rbc.ru/ins/business/11/02/2016/56bc77f69a79477ba00be719
[27] Shaytura, S.V., Stepanova, M.G., Shaytura, A.S., Ordov, K.V., Galkin, N.A. 2016. Application of information-analytical systems in management. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 90(2): 10-22.
[28] Shlychkov, V.V. 2015. ʽManual managementʽ as the manifestation of institutional crisis and deformation of existing model of Russian economy. Herald of economy, right and sociology, 4: 144-149.
[29] Shlychkov, V.V., Nestulaeva, D.R. 2015. Economic science and evolution of economic agents’ expectations formation process. Asian Social Science, 11(19): 82-89.
[30] The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. http://wwwwds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/1999/12/02/000178830_98101901364149/Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf. Date accessed: 10.02.2016.
[31] Timofeev, R.A., Kulish, S.M. 2011. Formation of complex potential of regional economic system. Scientific survey, 3: 3-11.
[32] Timofeev, R.A., Shlychkov, V.V., Alafuzov, I.G. 2015. Actual matters of functioning of the region as social-economic system. Actual matters of economy and right, 3:63-70.
[33] Tumashev, A.R., Tumasheva, M.V. 2016. Social-economic development of Russia and the tasks of investment policy. Herald of economy of the Republic of Tatarstan, 4: 12-22.
[34] Vedin, N.V., Shlychkov, V.V., Khasanova, A.Sh. 2015. A Quarter Century of Reform of the Russian Economy: Is it Wandering in a Maze or Jogging in Place? Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(10): 11
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.