The Application of Circumstance Abuse Doctrine (Misbruik Van Omstandigheden) on Judicial Practice in Indonesia

  • Agus Yudha HERNOKO Faculty of Law, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Ghansam ANAND Faculty of Law, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia

Abstract

This study analyzed the abuse of circumstances as a factor that delimits the freedom of making a contract associated with the onset of the contract, not because of the casue which is not allowed. The abuse of circumstance is not only related to the content of a contract, but rather related to what had happened at the time of the inception of the contract as one of the parties feels constrained to determine their will in a contract. It concerns on the circumstances that contribute to onset of the contract (i.e., taking benefit from other’s circumstance does not cause the content or intent of a contract be not permissible, rather, it may cause the missused will be restricted). The abuse of circumstances may happen due to one’s superiority over another party. The superiority is not only economic in nature, but also psychological, or both. Misusing such superiority may cause circumstance abuse. It is due to inequality of bargaining power that the weak cannot avoid from, while the stronger party abuses the circumstance by imposing the contents of the contract that leads to the inequal advantages for both parties. In Indonesia, the abuse of circumstances is often used as a cause to abrogate a contract due to the defect of will, although it is not yet regulated in legislation but rather derived from a legal construction recognized by the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court. It is definitely differenct from Netherlands that has regulated its misbruik van omstandigheden in article 3:44 lid 1 Nieuw Burgerlijk Wetboek.

References

[1] Adjie, H. 2009. Meneropong Khazanah Notaris dan PPAT Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
[2] Budiono, H. 2008. Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di Bidang Kenotariatan.Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
[3] Cheeseman, H.R. 2003. Contemporary Business & E-Coomerce Law. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle Rivver.
[4] Hernoko, Agus Yudha. 2010. Hukum Perjanjian, Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial. Jakarta: Kencana.
[5] Huda, Mokhamad Khoirul, Nugraheni, Kamarudin. 2016. The Nature of the Contract of Life Insurance Agency after Enactment of the Act Number 40 of 2014 on Insurance, Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics (Volume VII Fall),5(19):1037-1041, DOI:10.14505/jarle.v7.5(19)09.
[6] Huda, Mokhamad Khoirul. 2017. Good Faith in Life Insurance Contract by Indonesia Court. Hasanudin Law Review, 3(1):49-57. DOI:10.20956/halrev.v3i1.1046.
[7] Isnaeni, M. 2000. Perkembangan Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Kontrak sebagai Landasan Kegiatan Bisnis di Indonesia, Pidato Peresmian Penerimaan Jabatan Guru Besar dalam Ilmu Hukum pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga. Surabaya. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga.
[8] Pangabean, H.P. 2001. Penyalahgunaan Keadaan Sebagai Alasan (Baru) untuk Pembatalan Perjanjian. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
[9] Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. 1989. Azas-azas Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: Bale Bandung.
[10] Refiei, M., and Manap, N.A. 2011. Freedom of Contract in Click Warp Agreements in Malaysia and the United States of America. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education,4(1):47-54.
[11] Satrio, J. 1992. Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
[12] Satrio, R. 2001. Hukum Perikatan, Perikatan Yang Lahir Dari Perjanjian Buku I. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
[13] Simamora, Yohanes Sogar. 2010. Hukum Perjanjian, Prinsip Hukum Kontrak Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Oleh Pemerintah. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo.
[14] Simamora, Yohanes Sogar. 2016. Menuju Pembaharuan Hukum Kontrak Indonesia. Makalah disampaikan pada Konferensi Nasional Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Keperdataan (APHK). Malang: di Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya.
[15] Simanjuntak, R. 2006. Teknik Perancangan Kontrak Bisnis.Jakarta: Mingguan Ekonomi dan Bisnis Kontan.
[16] Subekti, R. 1989. Hukum Acara Perdata.Bandung: Bina Cipta.
[17] Scalise, R.J. 2008. Undue Influence and The Law of Wills: A Comparative Analysis. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 19(41): 41-106.
Published
2017-12-30
How to Cite
HERNOKO, Agus Yudha; ANAND, Ghansam. The Application of Circumstance Abuse Doctrine (Misbruik Van Omstandigheden) on Judicial Practice in Indonesia. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 7, p. 2128-2133, dec. 2017. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/2015>. Date accessed: 22 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v8.7(29).09.