The Principles of Advocacy Organization and Its Activities

  • Boris ALEYNIKOV Penza State University, Penza Branch of ‘Aleinikov and Partners’ of Interregional Bar Association of Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Anastasia ALEYNIKOVА Penza State University, Penza Branch of ‘Aleinikov and Partners’ of Interregional Bar Association of Moscow, Russian Federation

Abstract

The article gives a scientific study of the principles of advocacy. Formulated the concept and classification of principles of advocacy. On the basis of the sphere of dissemination of the principles of advocacy classified into fundamental principles (independence, professional competence, confidentiality, avoiding conflict of interest), organizational principles (territoriality, dependence of the judicial system, specialization, corporate governance, availability) and principles (efficiency, multidisciplinary approach, differentiated remuneration).

References

[1] Aleynikov, B. 2016. Contemporary judicial reform and modernization of advocate activity in the Russian Federation. Journal Scientific Works of the Russian Academy of Advocacy and Notary, 4(43): 15-21.
[2] Backof, J.F., and Martin, C.L. 1991. Historical perspectives: Development of the codes of ethics in the legal, medical and accounting professions. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(2): 99-110.
[3] Beke, T. 2014. Background to Litigation Communication in England. In Litigation Communication: Crisis and Reputation Management in the Legal Process (45-86). Springer International Publishing, Cham, Germany.
[4] Daicoff, S. 2010. Comprehensive Law: Transformative Responses by the Legal Profession. In Carter. C. C. (eds). Conflict Resolution and Peace Education: Transformations across Disciplines (97-126). Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY.
[5] Fasterling, B. 2009. The Managerial Law Firm and the Globalization of Legal Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1): 21-34.
[6] Garoupa, N. 2008. Providing a Framework for Reforming the Legal Profession: Insights from the European Experience. European Business Organization Law Review, 9(3): 463-495.
[7] Grajzl, P., and Murrell, P. 2006. Lawyers and politicians: the impact of organized legal professions on institutional reforms. Constitutional Political Economy, 17(4): 251-276.
[8] Gromek-Broc, K. 2002. The Legal Profession in the European Union – a Comparative Analysis of Four Member States. Liverpool Law Review, 24(1): 109-130.
[9] Henssler, M. 2017. The Organization of Legal Professions. General Reports of the XIXth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law Rapports Généraux du XIXème Congrès de l'Académie Internationale de Droit Comparé (261-280). Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
[10] Kiikeri, M. 2001. Comparative Law in European Legal Adjudication. In Comparative Legal Reasoning and European Law (57-267). Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
[11] Knapp, J.C., and Hulbert, A.M. 2017. Judicial Opinions and the Legal Profession Ghostwriting, Legal. In Ghostwriting and the Ethics of Authenticity (63-84). Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY.
[12] Lawton, L.J. 1984. Education for the legal profession. Liverpool Law Review, 6(1): 5-13.
[13] Mackie, K.J. 1989. Lawyers and Lawyers: In-House Lawyers and the Legal Profession. In Lawyers in Business: And the Law Business (212-238). Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK.
[14] Madsen, W. 1992. International, National and Sub-National Data Protection Laws. In Handbook of Personal Data Protection (231-1012). Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK.
[15] Maung, M. 1963. The Legal Profession. In Law and Custom in Burma and the Burmese Family (129-141). Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
[16] Philipsen, N., and Zhou, Q. 2016. Business Restrictions in the Legal Professions: Do We Need More Market Integration? In Market Integration: The EU Experience and Implications for Regulatory Reform in China (211-238). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.
[17] Schneider, U. 2004. Socialist Legal Experts: A New Profession? In Kurz-Milcke E., Gigerenzer G. (eds). Experts in Science and Society (65-81). Springer, Boston, MA.
[18] Starie, P., Creaton, J., and Wall, D. 2001. The legal profession and policy networks: an ‘advocacy coalition’ in crisis? In Savage, S. Ryan, M. and Wall, D. (eds). Policy Networks in Criminal Justice (pp. 76-97). Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK.
[19] Wardyński, T. 2011. Challenges to the Legal Profession in a Liquid Society. ERA Forum, 12(1): 15.
[20] Yandle, S. 2014. An old model adapted for a new era: preparing law school graduates for the global legal profession. China-EU Law Journal, 3(1): 65-77.
[21] Zacher, H.F. 2013. Social Policy in the Federal Republic of Germany: The Constitution of the Social. In Social Policy in the Federal Republic of Germany: The Constitution of the Social (23-424). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany
Published
2017-12-30
How to Cite
ALEYNIKOV, Boris; ALEYNIKOVА, Anastasia. The Principles of Advocacy Organization and Its Activities. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 7, p. 2068-2071, dec. 2017. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/2000>. Date accessed: 22 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v8.7(29).01.