Political and Legal Defining the Regulations of War in the Hague Convention of 1907
Abstract
International humanitarian law provided many institutional mechanisms aimed at preventing armed conflicts. However, the world is still subject to military action, even the most peace-loving nation is not completely immune to aggressive actions. Therefore, international legal regulation of war rules is being constantly improved and developed in order to weaken the horrific consequences of the fighting as much as possible. Multilateral treaties between states established the international regulations of war. The article investigates the history of the formation of the Hague system of international legal regulation of war rules. The Hague conventions defined the main rules of warfare and the legal status of their participants. These provisions are binding in armed conflicts in the countries-participants of conventions, and for states that did not signed them, the norms of international law will be applied. Although the conventions governing the rules of warfare were adopted over a hundred years ago, they have not lost their relevance today.References
[2] Burovoi, V.Yu. 1984. Foundation of the System of Scientific – Technical Programming. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 454.
[3] Declaration Renouncing the Use, in Time of War, of Explosive Projectiles under 400 Grammes Weight. S/Petersburg, 29 November / 11 December 1868. Retrieved from: https://www.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/INTRO/130?OpenDocument
[4] Eyffinger, A. 2011. Dreaming the Ideal, Living the Attainable: T.M.C. Asser [1838-1913]. Founder of the Hague Traditio. Hague, T.M.C. Asser Press.
[5] Granovskyi, G.L. 1997. About Legal Prognostics. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 73-80.
[6] Higgings, A. Pearce (ed.) 1909. The Hague peace conferences and other international conferences concerning the laws and usages of war: texts of conventions with commentaries. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
[7] K istorii pervoi Gaagskoi Konferentsii 1899 g., 1932. Krasnyi arkhiv, pp. 1-2, pp. 65-103.
[8] Kocharov, G. 1969. Judicial – medical expertise and interests of struggling with crime. Socialistic legality, 5: 18.
[9] Kokebayeva, G.K. 2009. Germaniia – Rossiia – SSSR: politika, voina i plen. Almaty, Kazakh universiteti.
[10] Kolmakov, V.P., and Arotsker, L.E. 1966. To improve the activity of judicial expertise departments. Socialistic legality, 6: 13.
[11] Komarovskii, L.A. 1905. Gaahskaia mirnaia konferentsiia 1899 goda. Moskva, Tipo-litografiia G.I.Prostakova.
[12] Lesaffer, R. 2013. The Temple of Peace The Hague Peace Conferences, Andrew Carnegie and the Building of the Peace Palace (1898-1913). Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Vereniging voor Internationaal Recht, Preadviezen, 140 (2013): 1-38.
[13] Mezhdunarodnoe pravo vedeniia boevykh deistvii. 1995. Sbornik gaagskikh konventsiii i inykh soglashenii.Moskva, Iuridicheskaia literatura.
[14] Safronova, E.V., and Loba, V.E. 2014. ‘Dangerous condition of person’ as criminal term. Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law, 3: 10-17.
[15] Schindler, D., and Toman, J. 1988. The Laws of Armed Conflicts: A Collection of Conventions, Resolutions, and Other Documents. Geneva, Henry Dunant Institute.
[16] Surygina, N.E. 1992. Increasing of effective usage of special scientific – crime detective knowledge in disclosing and investigating crimes. Diss of Cand.Sci. (Engineering). Moscow, pp. 110-11.
[17] Tileubergenov, E.M., and Pelevin, S.I. 2016. Place of Legal Psychology in the Legal System and its Role in the Legal Personality of Motivation. Armavir: RIO AGPU, pp. 153-158.
[18] Tileubergenov, E.M., and Pelevin, S.I. 2016. The Role of International Legal Regulation in the Mechanism of Protection of Human Rights. Armavir: RIO AGPU, pp. 174-187.
[19] Volynskyi, A.F. 1990. From fever to full rest. Soviet militia, 6: 9.
[20] Zhaninskyi, A.E. 1986. Actual Problems of Forecasting the Processes of Struggling with Crime. Moscow: Academy of MHA USSR, p.33.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.