Assessing the Innovation Attractiveness of Areas: Problems and Solutions

  • Andrey S. NECHAEV Irkutsk State Technical University, Irkutsk
  • Oksana V. ANTIPINA Irkutsk State Technical University, Irkutsk

Abstract

The effectiveness of comprehensive development programs largely depends on the qualitative assessment of innovative foundation of areas. Particular attention in stimulating innovative activities should be paid to the application of various tax instruments, which influence the tax burden for businesses. Thus, the study offers a developed algorithm for enhancing innovation attractiveness of administrative-territorial units. The model includes the fiscal component that provides the possibility to comprehensively estimate the potential of areas (federal districts, territorial entities of the Russian Federation) in conjunction with and in terms of interrelation with tax burden parameters, thus providing the improved innovative development of areas. Besides, the study demonstrates assessment results of innovation attractiveness of the Russian federal districts and regions. They include the calculation of deviations from the specified values and targets for each indicator of innovative development, including the fiscal component that enhances management effectiveness of the innovative development and control over the administrative-territorial units.

References

[1] Amosenok, E., Bajanov, V. 2006. Integral Assessment of the Innovation Potential of Russian Regions. Region: Economics and Sociology 2: 134 -145.
[2] Ashmarina, S. I., Streltsov, A. V., Dorozhkin, E. M., Vochozka, M. and Izmailov, A. M. 2016. Organizational and Economic Directions of Competitive Recovery of Russian Pharmaceutical Enterprises. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 11(7): 2581-2591.
[3] Atkinson, R.D., S.J. Ezell. 2012. Innovation Economics: The Race for Global Advantage. New Haven: Yale University Press, 440.
[4] Bogdan, C.A. 2016. An Assessment Model of the Impact of Innovation on Competitiveness Growth in Europe. National Strategies Observer 2: 342-354.
[5] Carlsson, B. (Ed.). 2012. Technological systems and economic performance. New York: Springer Science. 251.
[6] Dyatlov, S., Bulavko, O., Balanovskaya, A., Chudaeva, N. 2016. Principles of the Organization of the Global Economic System. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11(10): 3783-3790.
[7] Gokhberg, L., Roud, V. 2012. The Russian Federation: a new innovation policy for sustainable growth. The global innovation index, 51-72.
[8] Golichenko, O. 2006. The National Innovation System of Russia: State and Development. Moscow: Nauka. 362.
[9] Ivanov, V.G., Shaidullina, A.R., Drovnikov, A.S., Yakovlev, S.A., Masalimova, A.R. 2015. Regional Experience of Students' Innovative and Entrepreneurial Competence Forming. Review of European Studies 7(1): 35.
[10] Kosova, N.A., Averkieva, L.G. 2015. Economic growth in Russia. Journal of Economics and Social Sciences (6): 4-14.
[11] Lyasnikov, N.V., Dudin, M.N., Sekerin, V.D., Veselovsky, M.Y., Aleksakhina, V.G. 2014. The national innovation system: the conditions of its making and factors in its development. Life Science Journal 11(6): 535-538.
[12] Malysheva, T.V., Shinkevich, A.I., Kharisova, G.M., Nuretdinova, Y.V., Khasyanov, O.R., Nuretdinov, I.G., Kudryavtseva, S.S. 2016. The sustainable development of competitive enterprises through the implementation of innovative development strategy. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 6(1), 114-124.
[13] Parakhina, V.N., Boris, O.A., Midler, E.A. 2015. Evaluation of innovative regional development Russia. Asian Social Science 11(5): 201-211.
[14] Petrovskaya, M.V., Zaitseva, N.A., Bondarchuk, N.V., Grigorieva, E.M. and Vasilieva, L.S. 2016. Scientific Methodological Basis of the Risk Management Implementation for Companies’ Capital Structure Optimization. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 11(7): 2571-2580
[15] Veselovsky, M.Y., Abrashkin, M.S., Aleksakhina, V.G., Pogodina, T.V. 2015. Features of State Regulation of the economy in terms of its transition to innovative way of development. Asian Social Science 11(1): 288-296.
[16] Wenzel, L., Wolf, A. 2016. Towards a new measure of a country’s competitiveness: applying canonical correlation. Competitiveness Review 26(1): 87-107.
Published
2016-08-20
How to Cite
NECHAEV, Andrey S.; ANTIPINA, Oksana V.. Assessing the Innovation Attractiveness of Areas: Problems and Solutions. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 3, p. 564-571, aug. 2016. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/188>. Date accessed: 14 apr. 2024.
Section
Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics