WTO Principles in the Jurisprudence of International Commercial Arbitration: A Comparative Institutional Study of Great Britain and Russia

  • Agnessa INSHAKOVA Volgograd State University, Volgograd
  • Daniil FROLOV Volgograd State University, Volgograd
  • Svetlana KAZACHENOK Volgograd State University, Volgograd
  • Irina MARUSCHAK Volgograd State University, Volgograd

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the research of the impact of Russia’s accession to the WTO of the legal institutions in Russia. The major legal body in Russia that is involved in trade dispute settlement is the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation that following the country’s accession to the WTO faces the challenge to comply with the WTO principles of trade dispute settlement. The article represents the results of the analytical review of the WTO principles reception in the trade dispute settlement in the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation and the London International Arbitration Court. Theoretical and practical value of the study is determined by the need to study the developments in the Regulations of international commercial arbitration jurisdiction of the Russian Federation. The article performs the comparative analysis of the WTO principles reception in the process of trade dispute settlement by the arbitration institutions under study. The WTO principles that are indirectly expressed in theRegulation of ICAC and principles that must be enshrined in the Regulations of ICAC at RCCI are defined. It is concluded that the basic principles of ICAC at RCCI activity should be enshrined in a separate clause of the Regulation of the ICAC.

References

[1] Born, G.B. 2009. International commercial arbitration, Volume 1: Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer International.
[2] Canada vs The United States of America, LCIA, Case No. 91312 (2009). Official site of Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada, Available at: , accessed 13 April 2013.
[3] Djumulen, I.I. 2003. Vsemirnaja torgovaja organizacija [World Trade Organisation], (M.: ZAO Jekonomika).
[4] Dolinskaya V.V., Inshakova A.O., and Sorokozherd'eva V.V. (eds.) 2014. Principial'no-pravovye osobennost ireglamentacii razreshenija kommercheskihsporov v sisteme VTO. [Specifics of legal regulation of commercial disputes settlement in the WTO system], Strategija sovremennogo socio hozjajstvennogo razvitija Rossii: jekonomicheskie i pravovye aspekty. (Krasnodar, 175–218).
[5] En Cana Corporation vs Republic of Ecuador, LCIA, Case No. UN3481 (2006). Base legal decisions «ITA: Investment, Treaty, Arbitration», Available at: , accessed 13 April 2013.
[6] Gorjainova, V.V. 2012. K voprosu o sovremennyh tendencijah dejatel'nosti VTO po razresheniju torgovyh sporov [To a question about the current trends of the WTO to resolve trade dispute]. Nauka i biznes: puti razvitija, no.10.
[7] Grigera, N., and Horacio, A. 2014. Unified National Legal Treatment of International Commercial Arbitration: a Continuing Challenge, Arbitration Brief, no. 2/1.
[8] Inshakova, A.O., and Kozlova, M.Ju. 2013. Vlijanie vstuplenija v VTO na prioritety nacional'noj konkurentnoj politiki [The impact of WTO accession on the priorities of the national competition policy]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, no. 1.
[9] LCIA Arbitration Rules. 2014. available at: , accessed 1 September 2015.
[10] Mitchell, A.D. 2008. Legal Principles in WTO Disputes, Cambridge.
[11] Moses, M.L. 2012. The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, USA: Cambridge University Press.
[12] Moses, M.L. 2010. Arbitrator Power to Sanction Bad Faith Conduct: Can it Be Limited by the Arbitration Agreement? Australian Law Journal, 84.
[13] Shugurov, M.V. 2012. Vsemirnaja torgovaja organizacija: na puti k institutu global'nogo razvitija [The World Trade Organization: towards global development institution]. Pravo VTO, no. 2.
[14] Smbatjan, A.S. 2012. Vsemirnaja torgovaja organizacija: unikal'nost' iadekvatnost' [World Trade Organization: the uniqueness and value]. Pravo VTO, no.1.
[15] Tatarkin, A.I., and Lineckij, A.F. 2011. Prisoedinenie Rossii k VTO kak vazhnejshee uslovie ee integracii v mirovuju globalizirovannujuj ekonomiku [Russia's access into the WTO as a key condition for its integration into the world global economy]. Zhurnal jekonomicheskoj teorii, 4.
[16] Tetley, W. 2004. Good faith in contract particularly in the contracts of arbitration and chartering. Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 35.
[17] The United States of America vs Canada, LCIA, Case No. 111790. 2011. Official site of Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada, available at: , accessed 13 April 2013.
Published
2016-08-20
How to Cite
INSHAKOVA, Agnessa et al. WTO Principles in the Jurisprudence of International Commercial Arbitration: A Comparative Institutional Study of Great Britain and Russia. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 3, p. 535-544, aug. 2016. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/185>. Date accessed: 14 apr. 2024.
Section
Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics