Characteristics of Legal Culture Study in Russian and Foreign Legal Literature
Abstract
The article is dedicated to the research of problems of legal culture in national and foreign legal science. The particular difficulties were determined that arise on the way of jurists during the implementation of the specified task. The complexities were provoked by the relative non-development of the problems of legal culture in national legal science (the latter circumstance was due to the evident prevalence of the ideological postulates above the legal conscience). However, the complexities were overcome and by now the problems of legal culture took their position in the general range of legal sciences. The purpose of the present research is to consider and analyze the process of research of the problems of legal culture by national and foreign jurists, to determine the results of this process, and make the corresponding conclusions. Basing upon the previous accumulated experience and using the method of comparative analysis, performing the analogy and extrapolation between national and foreign researchers, on the one hand, and also between the studies of different periods, on the other hand, the authors of this research came to certain conclusions. The essence of the research is the significant results that were achieved in the field of studying the problems of legal culture. However, at the same time, basing upon that accumulated experience, it is necessary to perform the further research to solve the theoretical and practical problems as well.
References
[2] Agranovskaya, E.V. 1988. Pravovaya kultura i obespechenie prav lichnosti [Legal Culture and Individual Rights Enforcement]. Moscow: Nauka.
[3] Aleshina, E.A. 2008. Formirovanie pravovoi kultury v protsesse yuridicheskogo obrazovaniya: Avtoreferat diss. …kand. yurid. nauk [Formation of Legal Culture during Legal Education (Ph.D. Thesis Abstract)]. Rostov Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Rostov-on-Don.
[4] Avseev I.V., Kuznetsov E.V., and Salnikov V.P. 1979. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava (opredeleniya, skhemy, literatura)[Theory of State and Law (Definitions, Schemes, Literature)]. Leningrad: Publishing house of the Leningrad University.
[5] Bainiyazov, R.S. 2006. Pravosoznanie i pravovoi mentalitet v Rossii: Diss… dokt. yurid. nauk [Legal Consciousness and Legal Mentality in Russia (Doctoral Thesis)]. Saratov Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Saratov.
[6] Baranov, P.P., and Okusov, A.P. 2003. Aksiologiya yuridicheskoi deyatelnosti [Axiology of Legal Activity]. Rostov-on-Don: Rostov Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia.
[7] Bell, J. 1995. English Law and French Law – Not So Different? Current Legal Problems, 48(2): 63-102.
[8] Boer, V.M. 1993. Pravovaya informirovannost i formirovanie pravovoi kultury lichnosti (voprosy teorii): Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Legal Awareness and Formation of Legal Culture of Personality (Theoretical Questions) (Ph.D. Thesis)]. Saint Petersburg.
[9] Bogdan, M. 1994. Comparative Law. K.-Juwer.
[10] Bychkova, E.V. 2003. Pravovaya kultura v anglosaksonskoi pravovoi seme. Teoretiko-pravovoe issledovanie: Avtoreferat diss…kand. yurid. nauk [Legal Culture in Anglo-Saxon Legal Family. Theoretical and Legal Research (Ph.D. Thesis Abstract)]. Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Volgograd.
[11] Chekin, A.N., and Akimov, A.N. 2006. Pravovaya kultura na primere stran romano-germanskoi i anglosaksonskoi pravovykh semei [Legal Culture Illustrated by the Roman and German Countries and Anglo-Saxon Legal Families]. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava, 10: 7.
[12] Chkhikvadze, V.M. 1970. Zakonnost i pravovaya kultura na sovremennom etape kommunisticheskogo stroitelstva [Legitimacy and Legal Culture at the Modern Stage of Construction of Communism]. Kommunist, 14: 51.
[13] Cohen-Tanugi, L. 1996. Legal Cultures Compared: The American and the French and the German. In V. Gessner, A. Hofland, & C. Varga, European Legal Cultures. Sydney.
[14] Cruz, P. 1993. A Modern Approach to Comparative Law. Boston.
[15] Encyclopedia Britannica: A new Survey of Universal Knowledge (Vol. 1). 1996. Chicago; London; Toronto: William Benton Publisher.
[16] Ershova, L.A. 1991. Pravovaya kultura dolzhnostnykh lits i puti ee formirovaniya: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Legal Culture of Officials and Ways of Its Formation (Ph.D. Thesis)]. Academy of Social Sciences of the CPSU Central Committee, Moscow.
[17] Fedorin, V.P. 1986. Pravovaya kultura kak faktor ukrepleniya sotsialisticheskoi zakonnosti (Teoreticheskie voprosy): Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Legal Culture as a Factor of Socialistic Legitimacy Enforcement (Theoretical Questions) (Ph.D. Thesis)]. Moscow State Regional University, Moscow.
[18] Galesnik, L.S. 1962. Obshchenarodnoe pravo i vospitanie kommunisticheskoi soznatelnosti [Law of All People and Education of the Communist Consciousness]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 9: 27-35
[19] Giddens, A. 1987. Structuralism, Post-Structuralism and the Production of Culture. In A. Giddens, & H. Turner (Eds.), Social Theory Today. Stanford: University of Stanford Press.
[20] Guldens, A. 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Acad. Press.
[21] Gulyaikhin, V.N. 2013. Pravovaya kultura kak obekt nauchnogo issledovaniya: metodologicheskie podkhody, struktura i kriterii otsenki [Legal Culture as an Object of Scientific Research: Methodological Approaches, Structure and Criteria of Estimation]. Voprosy prava i politiki, 4: 135-138.
[22] Ivannikov, I.A. 1998. Kontseptsiya pravovoi kultury [Concept of Legal Culture]. Pravovedenie, 3: 12-16.
[23] Ivlev, Yu.V. 2001. Logika dlya yuristov: Uchebnik dlya vuzov [Logics for Lawyers: Textbook for Higher Educational Institutions]. Moscow: Aspekt Press Publ.
[24] Kaminskaya, V.I., and Ratinov, A.R. 1974. Pravovaya kultura i voprosy pravovogo vospitaniya [Legal Culture and Problems of Legal Education]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literature.
[25] Kelsen, Н. 1949. General Theory of Law and State. Cambridge, Great Britain: Mass.
[26] Kelsen, H. 1955. The Communist Theory of Law. London: Frederick A. Praeger.
[27] Keyzerov, I.M. 1983. Politicheskaya i pravovaya kultura [Political and Legal Culture]. Moscow: Mysl'.
[28] Kozhevnikov, V.V. 1992. Professionalnaya pravovaya kultura kak uslovie effektivnosti pravoprimeneniya v organakh vnutrennikh del: Diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Professional Legal Culture as a Factor of Efficiency of Law Enforcement in the Internal Affairs Bodies (Ph.D. Thesis)]. Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR, Moscow.
[29] Liebesny, H. 1981. Foreign Legal Systems: A Comparative Analysis. George Washington University.
[30] Lotman, Yu.M., and Uspensky, B.A. 2000. O semioticheskom mekhanizme kultury [Semiotic Mechanism of Culture]. In Yu.M. Lotman, Semiosfera [Semiosphere]. Saint Petersburg: Art-SPB.
[31] Menyman, J., and Clark, D. 1978. Comparative Law: Western European and Latin American Systems. New-York.
[32] Morozova, L.A. 2002. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of State and Law]. Moscow: Jurist.
[33] Moscovici, S. 1976. Social Influence and Social Change. London; New York; San-Francisco.
[34] Osnovy gosudarstvennoi politiki RF v sfere razvitiya pravovoi gramotnosti i pravosoznaniya grazhdan [Basic Principles of State Policy of the Russian Federation of Development of Legal Literacy and Legal Consciousness of Citizens]. (2011, April 28). Available at: http://www.kremlin.ru (accessed July 19, 2017).
[35] Petruchak, L.A. 2012. Pravovaya kultura sovremennoi Rossii: teoretiko-pravovoe issledovanie: Avtoref. dis. ... dokt. yurid. nauk [Legal Culture of Modern Russia: Theoretical and Legal Research (Doctoral Thesis Abstract)]. Moscow State University. M.V. Lomonosov, Moscow.
[36] Pevtsova, E.A. 2004. Sovremennye definitivnye podkhody k pravovoi kulture i pravovomu soznaniyu [Modern Definitive Approaches to Legal Culture and Legal Consciousness]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, 3: 221-244.
[37] Polyakov, A.B. 2003. Obshchaya teoriya prava: Fenomenologo-kommunikativnyi podkhod. Kurs lektsii [General Theory of Law: Phenomenological and Communicative Approach. Course of Lectures] (2nd ed., revised). Saint Petersburg: Piter.
[38] Pound, R. 1942. Social Control through Law. New Haven.
[39] Salnikov, V.P. 1984. Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost: pravovaya kultura i effektivnost [Socialist Legality: Legal Culture and Efficiency]. In Administrativno-pravovye aspekty pravovogo vospitaniya lichnogo sostava organov vnutrennikh del [Administrative and Legal Aspects of Education of the Military Personnel of Internal Affairs Bodies]. Saratov: Saratov University Press.
[40] Salnikov, V.P. 1990. Pravovaya kultura: teoretiko-metodologicheskii aspekt: Avtoref. dis. ... dokt. yurid. nauk [Legal Culture: Theoretical and Methodological Aspect (Doctoral Thesis Abstract)]. Leningrad: Publishing house of the Leningrad University.
[41] Salnikov, V.P. 2000. Pravovaya kultura [Legal culture]. In N.I. Matuzova and A.V. Malko (Eds.), Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of State and Law]. Moscow: Delo.
[42] Semitko, A.P., and Rusinov, R.K. 2000. Pravosoznanie i pravovaya kultura [Legal Consciousness and Legal Culture]. In Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of State and Law]. Moscow: NORMA-INFRA M.
[43] Smirnov, D.A. 2015. Tax Legal Personality of Public Institutions of Science. The Bulletin of Saratov State Social and Economic University, 4: 143-145.
[44] Smirnov, D.A., and Strus, K.A. 2015. General Scientific Analysis of Implementation of Principles of Law in the Contemporary Russian Legal Basic. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(S10), 84867.
[45] Vengerov, A.B. 2000. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Uchebnik dlya yuridicheskikh vuzov [Theory of State and Law: Textbook for Legal Educational Institutions]. Moscow: Yurisprudentsiya.
[46] Voplenko, N.N. 2000. Pravosoznanie i pravovaya kultura [Legal Consciousness and Legal Culture]. Volgograd: Publisher Volgograd State University.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.