Social Danger of Offence in the Scientific and Legislative Definitions in Russia and Other Countries
Abstract
The article analyzes the legislative and scientific definitions of the crime and other offences on the basis of comparative legal science. It substantiates that violations of criminal, administrative, civil, and other types of legislation have social danger. Social danger is an inherent characteristic of the offence not only according to the Russian legislation but also according to the legislation of other countries.
The purpose of this article is to corroborate the presence of the social danger characteristic not only in one type of offences – a crime, but also in different types of offences by using legislation of Russia and other countries.
References
[2] Baton, Ingraham L. 1979. Political in Europe. A comparative study of France, Germany and England. University of California press.
[3] Bekkaria, C. 1939. About crimes and punishments. Moscow: Jurisdat.
[4] Beloshapko, Y. N. 2001. Offence and liability in financial law. Pravovedenie, 5: 134-136.
[5] Carvell, I.G., and Green, E.S. 1970. Criminal Law and Procedure. London.
[6] Criminal Code of Argentina. 2003. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[7] Criminal Code of Australia. 2001. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[8] Criminal Code of Denmark. 2001. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[9] Criminal Code of Norway. 2001. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[10] Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany. 2002. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[11] Criminal Code of the French Republic. 2002. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[12] Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus. 2003. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[13] Criminal Code of the Republic of Bulgaria. 2002. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[14] Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova. 2003. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[15] Criminal Code of the Republic of Poland. 2001. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[16] Criminal Code of the Republic of San Marino. 2002. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[17] Criminal Code of the Republic of Tajikistan. 2001. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[18] Criminal Code of the Swiss Confederation. 2002. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[19] Criminal Code the Republic of Lithuania. 2003. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[20] Gromov, N.A., and Polunin S.A. 1998. Sanctions in the law of criminal procedure of Russia. Moscow Gorodets.
[21] Kurakin, A.V., et al. 2001. Qualification of administrative offences. Moscow: Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia.
[22] Lipinsky, D.A., and Musatkina, A.A. 2015. The characteristic of social danger of offence in scientific and legislative definitions in the member countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States and European countries. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3): 613-616.
[23] Maltsev, V.V. 1986. Investigator’s assessment of social danger that infringement poses to society. Volgograd: Higher School of Investigations of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs.
[24] Olkov, S.G. 1994. Criminal procedure offences in Russian legal proceedings: Abstract of a thesis … candidate of legal sciences. Moscow.
[25] Shushpanov, S.A. 2002. Official misconduct as the reason for disciplinary liability of a government official: Abstract of a thesis … candidate of legal sciences. Saratov.
[26] Slesarev, V.А. 1980. The object and result of a civil offence. Tomsk: Tomsk State University Publishing.
[27] Smirnov, V.I. 1998. Revisiting the issue of the essence of a criminal act (a critical sketch). Kharkiv.
[28] Syrovatskaya, L.A. 1990. Liability for infringement of labor law. Moscow: Juridicheskaja literatura.
[29] Vedyakhin, V.М., and Galuzin, А.F. 1996. Market economy and criminal offences. Atrium: Interuniversity collection of research articles. Series ‘Jurisprudence’, 4: 19-18.
[30] Vinogradov, V.A. 2002. Constitutional responsibility: questions of theory and legal regulation. Moscow.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.