Social Danger of Offence in the Scientific and Legislative Definitions in Russia and Other Countries

  • Dmitry LIPINSKY Tolyatti State University, Tolyatti, Russia
  • Aleksandra MUSATKINA Tolyatti State University, Tolyatti, Russia

Abstract

The article analyzes the legislative and scientific definitions of the crime and other offences on the basis of comparative legal science. It substantiates that violations of criminal, administrative, civil, and other types of legislation have social danger. Social danger is an inherent characteristic of the offence not only according to the Russian legislation but also according to the legislation of other countries. 


The purpose of this article is to corroborate the presence of the social danger characteristic not only in one type of offences – a crime, but also in different types of offences by using legislation of Russia and other countries.

References

[1] Alekseev, S.S. 1982. General theory of law. V. 2. Moscow: Juridicheskaya literatura.
[2] Baton, Ingraham L. 1979. Political in Europe. A comparative study of France, Germany and England. University of California press.
[3] Bekkaria, C. 1939. About crimes and punishments. Moscow: Jurisdat.
[4] Beloshapko, Y. N. 2001. Offence and liability in financial law. Pravovedenie, 5: 134-136.
[5] Carvell, I.G., and Green, E.S. 1970. Criminal Law and Procedure. London.
[6] Criminal Code of Argentina. 2003. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[7] Criminal Code of Australia. 2001. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[8] Criminal Code of Denmark. 2001. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[9] Criminal Code of Norway. 2001. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[10] Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany. 2002. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[11] Criminal Code of the French Republic. 2002. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[12] Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus. 2003. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[13] Criminal Code of the Republic of Bulgaria. 2002. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[14] Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova. 2003. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[15] Criminal Code of the Republic of Poland. 2001. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[16] Criminal Code of the Republic of San Marino. 2002. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[17] Criminal Code of the Republic of Tajikistan. 2001. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[18] Criminal Code of the Swiss Confederation. 2002. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[19] Criminal Code the Republic of Lithuania. 2003. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskij Centr Press.
[20] Gromov, N.A., and Polunin S.A. 1998. Sanctions in the law of criminal procedure of Russia. Moscow Gorodets.
[21] Kurakin, A.V., et al. 2001. Qualification of administrative offences. Moscow: Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia.
[22] Lipinsky, D.A., and Musatkina, A.A. 2015. The characteristic of social danger of offence in scientific and legislative definitions in the member countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States and European countries. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3): 613-616.
[23] Maltsev, V.V. 1986. Investigator’s assessment of social danger that infringement poses to society. Volgograd: Higher School of Investigations of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs.
[24] Olkov, S.G. 1994. Criminal procedure offences in Russian legal proceedings: Abstract of a thesis … candidate of legal sciences. Moscow.
[25] Shushpanov, S.A. 2002. Official misconduct as the reason for disciplinary liability of a government official: Abstract of a thesis … candidate of legal sciences. Saratov.
[26] Slesarev, V.А. 1980. The object and result of a civil offence. Tomsk: Tomsk State University Publishing.
[27] Smirnov, V.I. 1998. Revisiting the issue of the essence of a criminal act (a critical sketch). Kharkiv.
[28] Syrovatskaya, L.A. 1990. Liability for infringement of labor law. Moscow: Juridicheskaja literatura.
[29] Vedyakhin, V.М., and Galuzin, А.F. 1996. Market economy and criminal offences. Atrium: Interuniversity collection of research articles. Series ‘Jurisprudence’, 4: 19-18.
[30] Vinogradov, V.A. 2002. Constitutional responsibility: questions of theory and legal regulation. Moscow.
Published
2018-02-03
How to Cite
LIPINSKY, Dmitry; MUSATKINA, Aleksandra. Social Danger of Offence in the Scientific and Legislative Definitions in Russia and Other Countries. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 5, p. 1549-1555, feb. 2018. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/1709>. Date accessed: 22 may 2024.