Economic and Legal Support of Employee of Employee-Shared Ownership in Modern Russia: Regions’ Opinion

  • Olga Ivanovna GABDULHAKOVA Naberezhnochelninsky Institute of KFU, Naberezhnye Chelny
  • Olga Vladimirovna NEKRASOVA Naberezhnochelninsky Institute of KFU, Naberezhnye Chelny

Abstract

Currently in Russia, a great part of capital is steadily formed in a small number of people. Unfortunately, this model of capital concentration cannot be considered effective nor called socially equitable for the majority of the population. The difficult state of domestic production in all regions of the country, the negative impact of general political developments in the world and other factors contribute neither to the increase in the productivity of enterprises, nor to the increase in the employee’s interest to improve the profitability of enterprises, nor to the growth of the Russian economy as a whole. It is therefore necessary to consider alternative ways of development of the modern economy, to raise the interest of each employee (not only the owner, shareholder or senior management) of enterprises in the end result of their activity. In our opinion, an alternative form of society capitalization is the development of employee-shared ownership. This experience is especially prevalent today in many countries with successful economies. In Russia, this ownership exists in the form of a few public enterprises (employee-owned closed joint-stock companies). This paper considers the question of the attitude of the country’s regions to the functioning and dissemination of the experience of enterprises with employee stock ownership in the current Russian economic reality.

References

[1] Arando S., Gago M., Jones D.S. and Kato T. 2015. Efficiency in employee-owned enterprises: An econometric case study of Mondragon. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 68(2): 398–425.
[2] Artz G., and Kim Y. 2011. Business ownership by workers: Are worker cooperatives a viable option? Research Report. Ames: Iowa State University. Department of Economics.
[3] Bestolkov, V.I. 2014. Public enterprises in the Russian economy: achievements and challenges after 15 years of formation. Economy in the industry, 2(22): 3-8.
[4] Bestolkov, V.I., Nekrasova, O.V., and Khabibullin, R.I. 2015. Employee participation in the management of public enterprise: the experience of ‘S.P. Titov Naberezhnochelninskiy cardboard and paper mill’. Economics of Contemporary Russia, 2(69): 96-112.
[5] Blasi, J. R., and Kruse, D. 2004. The New Owners: The Mass Emergence of Employee Ownership in Public Companies and What it means to American Business, New York: HarperCollins.
[6] Bodrunov, S.D. 2015. Industrial policy of Russia: lessons from the past, features of the present, design of the future. Proceedings of the VEO (Anniversary edition), 195. - Moscow: VEO.
[7] Corporate governance in the modern world - [Electronic resource] - http://www.nccg.ru/site.xp/055050052057.html (free access).
[8] Dementiev, V.E. et al. 2015. The development of collective forms of management: the experience of the Lipetsk region: Proceedings of the Sixteenth All-Russian Symposium: Strategic planning and development of enterprises. Moscow: TsEMI, RAN, 47-51.
[9] Drucker, P. F. 2007. The Practice of Management. Peter F. Drucker. - Oxford: Elsevier - 309.
[10] Fakhfakh F., Perotin V., and Gago M. 2012. Productivity, capital, and labor in labor-managed and conventional firms: An investigation on French data. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 65(4): 847–879.
[11] Federal Law of July 19, 1998, No. 115-FZ ‘On Peculiarities of the Legal Status of Employee-owned Joint Stock Companies (Public Enterprises)’ (as amended of March, 21, 2002).
[12] Glushetsky, A.A. 1998. The design of ‘public enterprise’ - artificial and unsustainable. Russian Economic Journal, 2: 15-18.
[13] Khabibullin, R.I. 2013. Formation of an effective institutional environment of public enterprises in Russia. Russian Entrepreneurship, 17(239): 58-64.
[14] Knudsen H., Busck O., and Lind J. 2011. Work environment quality: the role of workplace participation and democracy// Work, Employment and Society, 25(3): 379–396.
[15] Proceedings of the IV report-back election conference of the Russian Union of Public Enterprises. 2003. Moscow, 3.
[16] Public enterprises today and tomorrow. - [Electronic resource] - http://www.eifgaz.ru/kovalev43-11.htm (free access).
[17] Skarzhinskaya, E.M., and Tsurikov, V.I. 2014. To the question about the effectiveness of collective actions. Russian Management Journal, 3: 87-106.
[18] Sukhanov, E.A. 2008. Civil law [Textbook in 4 Vol., 3rd ed., Rev. and ext.] - Moscow - Volume 1: General Part: 301-304.
[19] Temnitsky, A.L. 2014. Formation of the employee of the market type in the conditions of transformation of property relations. Sociological Studies, 5: 47-55.
[20] The Employee Ownership 100: America's Largest Majority Employee-Owned Companies. 2014. Retrieved from: http://www.nceo.org/articles/employee-ownership-100 (free access) (date assessed – 25.11.2015).
Published
2016-10-08
How to Cite
GABDULHAKOVA, Olga Ivanovna; NEKRASOVA, Olga Vladimirovna. Economic and Legal Support of Employee of Employee-Shared Ownership in Modern Russia: Regions’ Opinion. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 4, p. 788-796, oct. 2016. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/155>. Date accessed: 14 apr. 2024.