Cutting Administrative Barriers in Construction – What is the Actual Economic Effect?

  • Pavel KOSTRIKIN Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, Moscow, Russian Federation

Abstract

Far-reaching bureaucracy naturally creates administrative barriers to business, including construction business. This aggravates the business climate and decelerates the pace of urban development, which results in the public not having access to the necessary social infrastructure. This study explores the cutting of administrative barriers in house construction by the example of Moscow – a city with a transformation economy. A set of complementary research methods was used to achieve the set goals: government decree monitoring, comparative analysis, and the economic-statistical method. In order to eliminate excess administrative barriers in house construction, the government of the Russian Federation in 2014 approved an exhaustive list of administrative procedures in house construction, starting with the participation of the developer in the auction of the right to enter into a lease agreement for the land plot and ending with the state registration of the right of ownership to the object. According to government officials, the measures that were taken had to significantly cut the expenses borne by investors and the terms of implementation of construction projects. However, in spite of the reduced duration of administrative procedures, the set of reforms turned out to be piecemeal.

References

[1] Adachi, Y. 2013. Building big business in Russia: The impact of informal corporate governance practices. London: Routledge.
[2] Dalton, T. 2013. Australian suburban house building: industry organization, practices and constraints-final report. Australia: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
[3] Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 600. 2012. On Measures Aimed at Providing Citizens of the Russian Federation with Affordable and Comfortable Accommodations and Improving the Quality of Utility Services. Available at: http://ivo.garant.ru/#/document/70170944/paragraph/1:1.
[4] Federal State Statistics Service. 2015. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/dbscripts/cbsd/dbinet.cgi.
[5] Foo, R. 2015. Barriers to building institutional capacity in the Malaysian housing development sector. International Journal of Housing Policy, 15(4): 436-460.
[6] Gibbs, D., and O’Neill, K. 2015. Building a green economy? Sustainability transitions in the UK building sector. Geoforum, 59: 133-141.
[7] Jonsson, H., and Rudberg, M. 2014. Classification of production systems for industrialized building: a production strategy perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 32(1-2): 53-69.
[8] Komekbayeva, L.S., Legostayeva, A.A., Tyan, O.A., and Orynbassarova, Y.D. 2016. Government Measures for Economic Support in the Conditions of a Floating Exchange Rate of the National Currency. IEJME-Mathematics Education, 11(7): 2227-2237.
[9] Kosareva, N., Polidi, T., and Puzanov, A. 2014. Housing Construction in Russia: Current Market Conditions and Perspectives for Development. Problems of Economic Transition, 57(4): 26-52.
[10] Kostrikin, P.N. 2015. Investment support of real estate development. Moscow: MAKS Press.
[11] Kostrikin, P.N. 2016. Investment support of real estate development. Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
[12] Lessing, J. 2015. Industrialised House-Building-Conceptual orientation and strategic perspectives. Lund: Lund University.
[13] Marx, K. 1961. Manuscripts on economics. Moscow: State Political Literature Publishing House.
[14] MRR 3.1.10.02-04 Standards of Duration of Construction Object Design in Moscow City. 2005. Available at: https://znaytovar.ru/gost/2/MRR_31100204_Normy_prodolzhite.html.
[15] ONeill, K.J., and Gibbs, D.C. 2014. Towards a sustainable economy? Socio-technical transitions in the green building sector. Local Environment, 19(6): 572-590.
[16] Polidi, T.D. 2011. Monitoring and assessment of administrative barriers in house construction. Available at: http://www.urbaneconomics.ru/node/4438.
[17] Polidi, T.D. 2012. Administrative barriers during the implementation of investment and construction projects. Available at: http://www.urbaneconomics.ru/sites/default/files/3715_import.pdf.
[18] Popovic, D., and Winroth, M. 2016. Industrial timber house building-levels of automation. ISARC. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Department of Construction Economics & Property 33: 1.
[19] Regional Standards of Duration for the Construction of Buildings and Structures in Moscow City. 2007. Available at: http://www.gosthelp.ru/text/NormyRegionalnyenormyprod.html.
[20] Register of descriptions of procedures included in the exhaustive list of procedures in house construction, approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 403. 2014. Available at: http://www.minstroyrf.ru/docs/2222/.
[21] Report of Mikhail Men, Minister of the Construction Industry and Housing and Utilities Sector of the Russian Federation, at the final session of the ministry collegium. 2015. Available at: http://www.minstroyrf.ru/press/doklad-ministra-stroitelstva-i-zhkkh-rossiyskoy-federatsii-mikhaila-menya-na-itogovom-zasedanii-koll/.
[22] Russia to adopt an exhaustive list of procedures for house construction. 2014. Available at: http://realty.rbc.ru/articles/27/01/2014/562949990369516.shtml.
[23] Zhang, L., and Zhou, J. 2016. The effect of carbon reduction regulations on contractors' awareness and behaviors in China's building sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113: 93-101.
Published
2017-12-01
How to Cite
KOSTRIKIN, Pavel. Cutting Administrative Barriers in Construction – What is the Actual Economic Effect?. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 4(26), p. 1175-1184, dec. 2017. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/1523>. Date accessed: 26 may 2024.