Current Challenges and Competitive Advantages of National Innovation Systems (NIS) of the Countries-Participants of the Union State up to 2030
Abstract
The relevance of the study lies in the fact that the national innovation system is the driver of development for most countries. In it lay the possibility of the development and establishment of innovative industries, new technological processes, create competitive advantages. And thus, the opportunity to reduce the gap between the block formations. For the Union state, this problem is also relevant since at present the national innovation system of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation begin their development in different socio-economic conditions. Thus, they affect foreign economic interests, liabilities and prospects of the Eurasian Economic Union. The Union state is a separate entity and requires the establishment of national innovation systems on different levels.
The object of study is technological features and techniques for creating national innovative products, cooperation through innovative processes of various industries and services, and monitoring of cooperation with innovation in the Union state.
The aim is shaping the direction and development of recommendations for the formation of the national innovation system in connection with local economic ties and inter-country cooperation within the Union state.
The results of our work is recommendations for use of individual elements of national innovation system formation in one state, and presents analysis on the interaction in the Union state through the cluster and inter-regional enterprises. A promising area of cooperation presented by testing experience on the territory of the Eurasian Economic Union and possible future member of the Union state.
References
[2] Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B., Lehmann, E.E., and Licht, G. 2016. National systems of innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer 1-12. DOI:10.1007/s10961-016-9481-8.
[3] Biktimirov, M.R., and Syuntyurenko, O.V. 2016. Information systems as an institutional component of the innovation infrastructure. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 43(3): 154-161. DOI:10.3103/s0147688216030072.
[4] Caiazza, R. 2016. A cross-national analysis of policies affecting innovation diffusion. The Journal of Technology Transfer 41(6): 1406-1419. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-015-9439-2.
[5] Carayannis, E.G., and Grigoroudis, E. 2016. Using Multiobjective Mathematical Programming to Link National Competitiveness, Productivity, and Innovation. Annals of Operations Research, 247(2): 635-655. DOI:10.1007/s10479-015-1873-x.
[6] Döner, A.S. 2017. Innovation during and beyond the economic crisis. Global Financial Crisis and Its Ramifications on Capital Markets: Opportunities and Threats in Volatile Economic Conditions. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[7] Gokhberg, L., and Roud, V. 2016. Structural changes in the national innovation system: longitudinal study of innovation modes in the Russian industry. Economic Change and Restructuring, 49(2): 269-288. DOI: 10.1007/s10644-015-9164-8.
[8] Gunay, E.N., and Kazazoglu, G.N. 2016. National innovation efficiency during the global financial crisis period and afterwards national innovation efficiency during the global crisis: a cross-country analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
[9] Hong, Y. 2016. Developing an innovation-driven economy: The China path to economic transition and development. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
[10] Ivanov, V.V. 2016. Innovative territory as a basic element in the spatial structure of the national innovation system. Regional Research of Russia, 6(1): 70-79. DOI: 10.1134/s2079970516010044.
[11] Jackson, P., Runde, J., Dobson, P., and Richter, N. 2016. Identifying mechanisms influencing the emergence and success of innovation within national economies: A realist approach. Policy Sciences, 49(3): 233-256. DOI:10.1007/s11077-015-9237-6.
[12] Kapitonov, I.A., Shulus, A.A., Simonova, M.V., Sviredenko, D.A., Shreyner, R.T. 2016. Green Energy revolution perspectives in modern Russian economy. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(10): 166-175.
[13] Laredo, P. 2016. Innovation Policies: The national and regional dimensions. Economia e Politica Industriale, 43(3): 323-330. DOI:10.1007/s40812-016-0038-5.
[14] Leydesdorff, L., and Ivanova, I. 2016. ‘Open Innovation’ and ‘Triple Helix’ Models of Innovation: Can synergy in innovation systems be measured? Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2(1): 11. DOI:10.1186/s40852-016-0039-7.
[15] Li, P. 2016. Transition of occupational and social stratum and innovation of the social management system. Great changes and social governance in contemporary China. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[16] Li, X., and Zhou, D. 2016. Research on comprehensive evaluation of financial innovation ability of the national-level new areas based on grey correlation. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 21(2): 204-209. DOI:10.1007/s12204-016-1713-4.
[17] Lin, C.Y.-Y., and Chen, J. 2016. Cases of societal innovation. The impact of societal and social innovation: a case-based approach. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
[18] Mittal, S.K., Momaya, K., and Sushil. 2016. A Framework Conceptualization for National Technological Competitiveness. Managing Flexibility: People, Process, Technology and Business. New Delhi: Springer India.
[19] Schepers, S. 2016. Collaborative governance: a promising method for innovation. Revolutionising EU Innovation Policy: Pioneering the Future. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[20] Sevastyanova, A.E. 2017. Creating the conditions for innovation development of resource-based regions. Regional Research of Russia, 7(1): 1-9. DOI:10.1134/s2079970517010075.
[21] Van Someren, T.C.R., and van Someren-Wang, S. 2017. The challenge: renewal of the Russian innovation system strategic innovation in Russia: towards a sustainable and profitable national innovation system. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[22] Wang, R.-H., Lv, Y.-B., and Duan, M. 2016. Evolutionary game of inter-firm knowledge sharing in innovation cluster. Evolving Systems 1-13. DOI:10.1007/s12530-016-9153-9.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.