Disadvantages in Differentiation and Exceeding Limits of Necessary Defense According to the Legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan

  • Aigul Abaevna BAZILOVA Chair of Criminal Law, Criminal Trial and Criminalistics of the Law Department Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

Abstract

The article shows that the specificity and content of criminal law due to the tasks that lie before him. It is shown that a criminal law tasks the author defines the protection of rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of man and citizen, property, rights and legitimate interests of organizations, public order and safety, environment, constitutional order and territorial integrity of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the legally protected interests of society and the state from criminal attacks, protecting the peace and security of mankind, as well as the prevention of crime, to which belong and the necessary self-defense. For the foundation of criminal responsibility in article defines what hazardous to individuals, society or the state acts are crimes, prescribes penalties and other measures of criminal law for their commitment, that is, these problems are solved in the process of implementation of the regulatory and enforcement functions of the criminal law.

References

[1] Bissenova, M.K. 2009. Concept of guilt at crime classification. Materials of international scientific and practical conference ‘Problems of struggle with transnational crime and corruption in global conditions’ devoted to the 75th anniversary of KazNU named after Al-Faraby. Almaty: Kazakh University.
[2] Bissenova, M.K. 2009. Responsibility of the guilty for a crime of forethought. Materials of international scientific and practical conference ‘Problems of struggle with transnational crime and corruption in global conditions’ devoted to the 75th anniversary of KazNU named after Al-Faraby. Almaty: Kazakh University.
[3] Christopher, C.M.V. 2004. Necessary action: a new defense. Criminal Law Review 2: 81-95.
[4] Criminal code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. http://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/K970000167_
[5] Criminal responsibility for negligence. Moscow: State Publishing house of legal literature.
[6] Danner, Allison and Martinez, Jenny. 2005. Guilty Associations: Joint Criminal Enterprise, Command Responsibility, and the Development of International Criminal Law. California Law Review 93(1): 75-169.
[7] Delgado, Richard. 1985. 'Rotten Social Background': Should the Criminal Law Recognize a Defense of Severe Environmental Deprivation? Law and Inequality 3: 9-90.
[8] Khalikov, K.H. 1970. Required defense on Soviet Criminal Law: synopsis of a thesis of the candidate of legal sciences. Alma-Ata.
[9] Kony, A.F. 1996. On the right for required protection. Moscow.
[10] New criminal code of France. Moscow: Legal college of MSU the Publishing house.
[11] New decade, new economic expansion, new possibilities for Kazakhstan: Letter of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan N.A.Nazarbayev to Kazakhstan people. http://www.kazembqatar.com/cvpresident/1280654885/.
[12] Radchenko, V.I. 1996. Comments to Criminal code of RF. Moscow.
[13] The Decree of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated 24.08.2009 No. 858 ‘Legal policy concept of the Republic of Kazakhstan from 2010 till 2020’. http://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/U090000858_
[14] Turetskyi, N.N. 1998. Required protection on criminal law of the Republic of Kazakhstan (problems of rightful protection limits). PhD diss., sciences. KNTU.
Published
2016-10-08
How to Cite
BAZILOVA, Aigul Abaevna. Disadvantages in Differentiation and Exceeding Limits of Necessary Defense According to the Legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 4, p. 752-758, oct. 2016. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/148>. Date accessed: 14 apr. 2024.