On the Personality of Convict
Abstract
The article deals with the issues of the convict’s personality. The authors tried to explore this problem in detail through the dialectical approach. A special attention was paid to the issues of convict’s personal change under the conditions of institutional confinement. The authors make accurate conclusions regarding the impossibility of depicting convicts’ profiles without focusing on their moral and ethical as well as psychological peculiarities. In recent years, the state penal policy has undergone significant changes. In this regard, the reform of the penitentiary system, improvement and optimization of the penal law and the penal system required greater attention to the individual characteristics of the convicted to imprisonment.
The current legislation is determined that the funds are used, and the direction, taking into account personal characteristics and features of the behavior of prisoners. In the last few years a number of authors emphasized the role of learning and psychological correction of personality characteristics and features of the behavior of prisoners to prevent destructive phenomena in prisons, enabling adaptation to life after release from punishment, the prevention of recidivism. In this aspect of the study of character traits of the person convicted it is very relevant, as the character is seen in the domestic and foreign psychology as one of the most important components of personality that determines human behavior and activity.References
[2] Antonyan, Yu.M., Kudryavtsev, V.N., and Eminov, V.E. 2004. The Personality of Criminal. MIA.
[3] Baillon, A., Bleichrodt, H., Liu N., and Wakker, P.P. 2016. Group decision rules and group rationality under risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1): 1-18.
[4] Beron, T. 2002. Theories of Personality. Science.
[5] Burlakov, V.N. 1998. Criminogenic Personality and Individual Prevention of the Crimes: the Problems of Simulation. St. Petersburg State Press.
[6] Burlakov, V.N., and Kropachev, N.M. 2003. Criminal Science. St. Petersburg State Press.
[7] Caenazzo, L., Tozzo, P., and Rodriguez, D. 2016. Hospitalized hunger-striking prisoners: the role of ethics consultations. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 1(1): 1-6.
[8] Dzhansaraeva, R.E., and Romashov, R.A. 2014. Penal Criminality and the Legal Mechanism of Penal Safety Provision. Vena.
[9] Eleonskiy, V.A. 1980. The Effect of Punishment of the Convicts. MIA.
[10] Frumkin, I.B. 2016. The Role of Suggestibility in Personal Injury Claims. Psychological Injury and Law 9(2): 97-101.
[11] Ghosal, V. and Sokol, D.D. 2016. Policy Innovations, Political Preferences, and Cartel Prosecutions. Review of Industrial Organization, 48(4): 405-432.
[12] Golubev, V.P., Kudryakov, Yu.N. and Shamis, A.V. 1985. Typology of the Violent Convicts and Individual Work with them. Science.
[13] Linton, S. 2016. Women Accused of International Crimes: A Trans-Disciplinary Inquiry and Methodology. Criminal Law Forum, 27(2): 159-226.
[14] Mokretsov, A.I. 1992. Social and Psychological Peculiarities of the Convicts Subculture. Punishment and Correction of Criminals. Feniks.
[15] Pirozhkov, V.F. 1967. Personal Tendency and the Motives of the Convict’s Activity. Legal Literature.
[16] Redlich, A.D., Bushway, S.D., and Norris, J. 2016. Plea decision-making by attorneys and judges. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(1): 1-25.
[17] Rhineberger-Dunn, G., Briggs, S.J., and Rader, N. 2016. Clearing Crime in Prime-Time: The Disjuncture Between Fiction and Reality. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(2): 255-278.
[18] Sivertsson, F. 2016. Catching Up in Crime? Long-Term Processes of Recidivism Across Gender. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1(1): 1-25.
[19] Skakov, A.B. 2004. Progressive System of Confinement and its Reflection in the New Legislation of Kazakhstan. Astana.
[20] Taillieu, T.L. et al. 2016. Pregnancy and Intimate Partner Violence in Canada: a Comparison of Victims Who Were and Were Not Abused During Pregnancy. Journal of Family Violence, 31(5): 567-579.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.