Social and Political Processes, Socialization Institutions and Youth Policy Subjects of Modern Russia
Abstract
The relevance of the study is determined by the importance of modern Russian youth`s valuable orientations formation from the perspective of the state and public youth policy in the Russian Federation. Therefore, this article analyzes the implementation of the state youth policy in modern Russia. Students` perception of youth social and political processes, social institutions and subjects of youth policy are estimated on the basis of original monitoring results. Questionnaire was a key method chosen for the case study. Presented results indicate that recent socio-political events have significantly changed the perception of social and political processes by the youth. Consolidation of Russian students occurred, a certain politisation was revealed, the growth of the youth national identity was detected. The need to active promotion of youth`s patriotic impulse and existing potential implementation is indicated. The article materials are of practical value for the specialists engaged with the socio-political and legal implementation aspects of youth policy in the Russian Federation.
References
[2] Coleman, J. 1992. Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300. American West Publishers. 288.
[3] Consultant Plus. 2015. Fundamentals of the state youth policy of the Russian Federation for the period till 2025: Are approved by the order of the Government of the Russian Federation of November 29, 2014 No. 2403-r. Official site of the Consultant Plus company. Available at: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=171835;fld=134;dst=1000000001,0;rnd=0.34501696714343044
[4] Diakov, A.I. 2016. ‘The Crimean spring’ in a mirror of the local press. Innovative Science, 4: 42–45.
[5] Eagley, A.H., and Johnson, B.T. 1990. Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. J. Person Soc. Psychol, 60: 685-710.
[6] Elishev, S.O., and Talanova, K.S. 2014. Results of social research ‘Valuable orientations of modern Russian youth, feature of process of their forming and implementation of youth policy’. Social Researches of Social Problems of Modern Russian Society, 1: 64-129.
[7] Elishev, S.O. 2012. Youth policy in the course of formation of valuable orientations of modern Russian youth. Space and Time, 1: 113–119.
[8] Elishev, S.O. 2013. Youth in modern political processes. Prospects of Science, 7: 113–119.
[9] Elishev, S.O. 2015a. Traditional religious faiths of Russia in the course of socialization of modern Russian youth. Policy and Society, 9: 1231–1238.
[10] Elishev, S.O. 2015b. Youth as object of socialization and manipulations. 2nd edition. Moscow: ‘Kanon+’, ROOI ‘Reabilitatsia’. 320.
[11] Filippov, F.R. 1998. Youth. In Russian sociological encyclopedia. M.
[12] Goncharova, I.V., and Pronchev, G.B. 2015. The moral education of youth in the context of helping people with disabilities. Education and Upbringing, 2: 66 - 69.
[13] Levashov, V.K. 2004. Moral and political consolidation of the Russian society in the conditions of neoliberal transformations. Social Researches, 7: 27-46.
[14] Levashov, V.K. 2006. Patriotism in the context of modern socio-political realities. Social researches, 8: 67-75.
[15] Mikhailova, O.B., and Kaminskaya, E.A. 2016. Gender Characteristics of the Students’ Innovative Behavior. The Social Sciences, 11: 4483-4488.
[16] Osipova, N.G. 1985a. Moral values of the Soviet student's youth. Moscow: ISI Academy of Sciences of the USSR.
[17] Osipova, N.G. 1985b. The main directions and levers of bourgeois promotion on moral values of the Soviet youth. In The Critical analysis of the theory and practice of bourgeois promotion. Moscow: ISI Academy of Sciences of the USSR.
[18] Osipova, N.G., Elishev, S.O., Pronchev, G.B., and Monakhov D.N. 2015. Perception by student's youth of socio-political processes, institutes of socialization and subjects of youth policy in modern Russia (results of sociological monitoring). Etnosociety and international culture, 8(86): 50–62.
[19] Osipova, N.G., Elishev, S.O., Pronchev, G.B., and Monakhov, D.N. 2016. Features of process of formation of valuable orientations of modern Russian youth and implementation of youth policy in the Russian Federation (results of a sociological research). Monograph. Moscow: MAX Press. 280.
[20] Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary. 1983. Moscow. 840.
[21] Pronchev, G.B., Monakhov, D.N., and Kovalchuk, V.K. 2016. Contemporary Internet as a Means for Leveling Social Inequality in the Context of Relationships between Civil Society and the State. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(17): 9959-9967.
[22] Roszak, Th. 1969. The Making of a Counter Culture: Reflections on the Technocratic Society and Its Youthful Opposition. Garden City N.Y. 303 .
[23] Sushko, V.A., and Pronchev, G. B. 2014. Local perception of regional sustainability issues – the Volgograd case. Austrian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2): 37-41.
[24] Sushko, V.A., Pronchev, G.B., Shisharina, E.V., and Zenkina, O.N. 2016. Social and Economic Indices of Forming the Quality of Life. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(18): 10839-10849.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.