The Challenges of Fighting Crime in the Current Geopolitical Environment
Abstract
The present article considers some aspects of intensifying the fight against crime under the prevailing geopolitical conditions. A threat of both international and common crime spreading on a planetary scale indicates a further increase in the criminological tension in the large part of our planet. This generates an objective need for a theoretical reconsideration of the phenomenon of crime in the current geopolitical environment. As a result of the rethinking of crime trends in the current context, scientific experts put forward disappointing conclusions. One of these conclusions is that a further galloping increase in crime may ultimately be transformed into a real potential threat to the normal existence of the entire human community. With regard to the studies on the specificity and peculiarities of quantitative and qualitative common crime types, representing an increased threat to the interests of mankind, scientists formulated a number of conceptual provisions and recommendations on increasing the efficiency of the fight against crime in the current geopolitical environment.
References
[2] Andreyev, A.F. 2016. International legal contribution of the Russian Federation into the modern world order. Moscow, State and Law, 1: 89.
[3] Aristotle. 1983. Works in 4 Vol. Moscow, p.380.
[4] Babayev, M.M. 1982. Social consequences of crime. Moscow, p.3.
[5] Carroll, B.J. 2007. A dialogue of civilizations: Gülen's Islamic ideals and humanistic discourse. New Jersey: Tughra Books.
[6] Chistyakov, A.A. 2003. The mechanism of forming the criminal liability base: concept and features. Moscow, Law and Justice, 2: 46.
[7] Chumakov, A.I. 1994. The philosophy of global problems. Moscow: Znaniya, p.120.
[8] Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. 1948.
[9] Derrida, J. 1998. An essay about the name. Moscow: Norma: INFRA-M, p. 24.
[10] Kalmakaryan, R.A. 2014. Inclusion of the Russian Federation in the process of maintaining international peace and security. Moscow, State and Law, 4: 82.
[11] Kalmakaryan, R.A., and Migachev, Yu.I. 2015. International regulatory system as an institutional and legal component of the modern world order. Moscow, State and Law, 6: 69.
[12] Kozochkin, I.D., and Gamzalov, D.A. 2014. Civil forfeiture by the example of the US criminal law. Moscow, State and Law, 10: 64.
[13] Lawson, T., and Garrod, J. 2001. Dictionary of sociology. London: Fitzroy Dearborn.
[14] Lobach, D.V. 2014. International legal order as an object of criminal law protection in international law. Moscow, International Criminal Law and International Justice, 1: 15.
[15] Lukashuk, I.I. 2000. Globalization, state, law. 21st century. Moscow, p. 50.
[16] Luneyev, V.V. 2015. Internationalization of constitutional law in the context of globalization. Moscow, State and Law, 11: 36.
[17] Luneyev, V.V. 2005. Crime of the twentieth century: global, regional and Russian trends. Moscow: Wolters Kluwer, p. 624.
[18] Luneyev, V.V. 2005. Crime of the XX century: global, regional and Russian tendencies. Moscow: Wolters Kluwer.
[19] Luneyev, V.V. 2010. Criminological problems of globalization. State and Law, 1: 51.
[20] Marcel, G. 1973. Tragic wisdom and beyond. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
[21] Modern problems and strategies to fight crime. 2005. Saint Petersburg, p. 243.
[22] Modern terrorism: state and prospects. 2000. Moscow, pp. 54-71.
[23] Nersesyants, V.S. 1997. The philosophy of law. Moscow, p.108.
[24] Nomokonov, V.A. 2001. International criminal law. Vladivostok, p.5.
[25] Rakhmetov, S.M. 2016. Commentary to the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Almaty: Norma-K, p. 270.
[26] Romashev, Yu.S. 1999. Conceptual model of international crimes committed at sea. M., State and Law, 12: 67.
[27] Rubanov, A.A. 1994. Theoretical foundations of international cooperation between national legal systems. Moscow, p.11.
[28] Sartre, J.P. 1981. Existentialism is a humanism. Twilight of the Gods. Moscow: Publishing House of Political Literature, p.336.
[29] Sheley, J. F. 2000. Criminology: a contemporary handbook (Third ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
[30] State and law. 2000. Moscow, State and Law, 9: 99.
[31] Superterrorism: the new challenge of the new century. 2002. Moscow, pp. 175-220.
[32] The first philosophical and legal reading in memory of academician V.S. Nersesyants. 2006. Moscow, Law and Politics, 12: 21.
[33] The international legal framework to fight terrorism. Collection of documents. 2003. Moscow, p.128.
[34] The IV seminar on the sociology of crime. 1991. Soviet State and Law, 10: 149.
[35] Truntsevskiy, Yu.V. 2014. The concept of transnational crime. Moscow, International Criminal Law and International Justice, 3: 9.
[36] Volevodz, A.G. 2014. Criminalization of international terrorism in criminal law. Moscow, International Criminal Law and International Justice, 2: 3.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.