Forensic Science in the European Union Criminal Justice: the Challenges for Mutual Recognition
Abstract
The main goal of the present article is to identify and disclose, which methodological and practical problems are and may be encountered during the implementation, within the legal practice, of the processes of free movement of evidence across the European Union. The authors highlight the necessity to reveal which structural, institutional, legal and administrative aspects influence the difficulties of implementation of the principle of mutual recognition during the collection and transfer of evidence from one state to another, when such evidence was obtained through the application of the forensic achievements and special knowledge. The absence of the uniform approach towards the use of forensic science for the collection and transfer of evidence to another state due to different quality and methodological standards applied for the provision of forensic services in the international cooperation in criminal proceedings result in the limited efficiency of the principle of mutual recognition.
The article applies the systematic analysis, comparative, documentary, critical, logical induction and deduction, abstraction and other research methods, which ensure the methodological, consistent and well-grounded presentation of the analytical reasons, drawing of the conclusions and formulation of the possible solutions for the removal of problems.
The authors distinguish two groups of problems, which help identify the difficulties of assessment of the forensic evidence collected and examined in one Member State by the competent judicial authority of another Member State.
In particular, those reasons are of the organizational (institutional) nature and of the criminal procedural legal nature. The reasons of the organizational nature require establishment, across the European Union, of uniform and common quality and methodological standards for forensic science laboratories, expert agencies, etc. The reasons of the criminal procedural legal nature show that in order to avoid any difficulties while assessing in court the forensic evidence collected in another Member State, it is necessary to provide a possibility for the requesting state to specify in the request for the collection of the evidence, what formalities must be followed by the executing state in order to secure the admissibility of such evidence.
References
[2] Commission of the European Communities. Brussels, 2009, COM(2009)624 Final. Green Paper on obtaining evidence in criminal matters from one Member State to another and securing its admissibility. [interactive]. [seen on the 2nd of December, 2016]. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0624:FIN:EN:PDF.
[3] Council Decision 2008/616/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the implementation of Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime. Official Journal of the European Union, 2008, L 210/12.
[4] Council Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA of 22 July 2003 on the execution in the European Union of orders freezing property or evidence. Official Journal of the European Union, L 196/45.
[5] Council Framework Decision 2008/978/JHA of 18 December 2008 on the European evidence warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters. Official Journal of the European Union, 2008, L 350/72.
[6] Council Framework Decision 2009/905/JHA of 30 November 2009 on Accreditation of forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities. Official Journal of the European Union, 2009, L 322/14.
[7] Council of the European Union (2016). Council Conclusions and Action Plan on the way forward in view of the creation of an European Forensic Science Area - Council conclusions (9 June 2016), 10128/16, Brussels, 13 June 2016.
[8] Council of the European Union. Council conclusions on the vision of European Forensic Science 2020 including the creation of a European Forensic Science Area and the development or forensic science infrastructure in Europe. 30315th Justice and Home Affairs Council meeting. Brussels, 13 and 14 December, 2001. [interactive]. [seen on the 2nd of December, 2016]. Available at: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/jha/ 126875.pdf.
[9] Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters. Official Journal of the European Union, L 130/1.
[10] Safeguarding the use of expert evidence in the European Union. Final Project Report. JLS/2006/AGIS/058. Co-financed a grant under the European Commission’s AGIS Programme. [interactive]. [seen on the 2nd of December, 2016]. Available at: http://www.ecba.org/extdocserv/projects/expertwit/SafeguardingExpertEvidenceEUProjectRep2009.pdf
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.