Bureaucrat Image in Russia

  • Elena Victorovna FROLOVA Department of Management and Administration Russian State Social University, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Tatyana Mikhailovna RYABOVA Department of Management and Administration. Russian State Social University, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Olga Vladimirovna ROGACH Department of Management and Administration Russian State Social University, Moscow, Russian Federation

Abstract

The issue of a civil servant positive image development becomes a relevant one within the current terms of public confidence increase in civil service institution, the fight against corruption and state authority competence improvement.


On the basis of public servant and citizen sociological survey about the professional and personal qualities of public servants, as well as on mass media content analysis, the authors describe a perfect portrait of a modern civil servant in Russia, determine the areas of his image transformation, and the factors of a positive image development. In the course of periodical context analysis the hypothesis was disproved that mass media develop a negative image of civil servants, which influences the negative perception of public servant activity by society. The sociological survey among officials and citizens showed that the opinion about civil servants in the minds of people is developed on the basis of the following factors:  the understanding that the employees work in accordance with the principle of serving for society and the state; the level of professionalism and competence among civil servants; the improvement of their work quality. Among the professional qualities, essential for officials were they specified ‘professionalism’ and ‘the ability to communicate with people’ and ‘activity’, ‘the spirit of enterprise’ and ‘integrity’ are specified among personal qualities. According to the author research results the factors that have a negative impact on the generated image of the public service were specified: a well-established negative stereotype of an official in people's minds; corruption; impunity; impaired communication.

References

[1] Eremina, E.V. 2002. Career values among civil servants. Penza.
[2] Zhidkyh, E.N. Modern communication technologies: communicative space phenomenon. Available at http://www.asu.ru/files/documents/00003306.pdf (date of appeal: 22.11.2016)
[3] Zinchenko, Ya.G. 2011. State civil service professionalization. Rostov on Don: Publishing house SKAGS
[4] Kozyrev, A.A., and Goryacheva, D.A. 2015. Valuable orientations of civil servants: gender dimension. Management consulting. 9: 8-19.
[5] Komarovsky, V.S. 2003. Civil service and mass media (lecture course). Voronezh. VSU Publishing House,
[6] Miroshnichenko, O.M., and Mikhailova M.V. 2013. A positive image creation of a state official: domestic and foreign experience. Bulletin of Chuvash University 4.
[7] Ryabova, T.M. 2015. The factors influencing the formation of a state officer image in Russian Federation. Human Capital, 07: 71-74
[8] Frolova, E.V. 2016. Interaction of the population and local government: Problems and new opportunities. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 4: 59-64
[9] Frolova, E.V., et al. 2016. Development of Social Infrastructure in the Management Practices of Local Authorities: Trends and Factors. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(15): 7421-7430.
[10] Hunt, T., and Gruning, J. 2008. ‘Public relation’ methods in USA. Public service abroad. Abstract information bulletin. 1 (21), 98: ‘Public relations’ in government. M.: RAGS
[11] Fragkou, P. 2013. Training Civil Servants to ERMIS IT system for the purposes of Directive 2006/123/EC. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 73: 430 – 437
[12] Matei, A., and Matei L. 2014. Instructional design for administrative sciences. A case study for civil servants training. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116: 1930 – 1933
[13] Matei L., Matei A., and Lazar C. G. 2016. Public service performance and good administration. Socio economic empirical evaluations. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39: 335 – 338
[14] Pratama, A.P. et al. 2015. Civil Servants’ Competence in Indonesia: Suggestions for Future Research in the Context of Business. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169: 371 – 377
[15] People's Daily. Available at: http://www.eeo.com.cn/ens/2013/0529/244624.shtml (date of appeal: 03.10.2013).
[16] Walle, S. de van, Roosbroek, S. van, and Bouckaert, G. 2008.Trust in the public sector: is there any evidence for a long-term decline? // International Review of Administrative Sciences. 74(1): 47-64.
[17] Gureva, M.A., et al. 2016. Management of Innovations and Innovative Process: Concept, Essence, Classification and Diffusion. International review of management and marketing, 6(6S): 147-153.
[18] Makushkin, S.A., et al. 2016. Role of inclusion ‘Smart city’ concept as a factor in improving the socio-economic performance of the territory. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 6 (S1): 152-156.
Published
2017-06-05
How to Cite
FROLOVA, Elena Victorovna; RYABOVA, Tatyana Mikhailovna; ROGACH, Olga Vladimirovna. Bureaucrat Image in Russia. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 1, p. 52-58, june 2017. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/1129>. Date accessed: 21 dec. 2024.