Optimization and Management of Quality of Life in the Region, Using the Example of the Primorye Territory (Russia)
Abstract
The issue of improving the quality of life in the Russian regions is one of the major issues of all levels of governing bodies. The basic idea of the proposed management optimization model of quality of life of the region considers a synergistic effect of changes of various quality of life indicators. The main difficulty of managing the synergistic effect in social and economic systems is that, unlike physical systems, which adopt appropriate units of measurement and quantitative evaluation methods for management indicators, at this stage of the theory development, for such systems objective evaluation methods for the synergy level do not exist. The present optimization mathematical model allows us to evaluate the effectiveness of the regional budget distribution in terms of improving the region population quality of life. The paper discusses methodological approaches of evaluating the model parameters. With reference to questionnaires of the Primorye Territory population, the evaluation distribution was defined for factors, which affect the quality of life for the time periods. The paper presents the methodical approaches to the synergy evaluation of the quality of life (QOL) indicators. The considered optimization model is based on the generalized indicators of the QOL. The proposed model allows us to structure and synthesize the views of experts in various fields of economy. Using the model, the structure of the funds distribution, which was accepted to be performed, can be estimated for the region in the near future.
References
[2] Ayvazian, S.A. 2002. Analysis of the QOL synthetic categories of the population in the constituent territories of Russian Federation: their measurement, dynamics, key trends. Living standards of the population in Russian regions. No. 11: 5 – 40.
[3] Ayvazian, S.A. 2003. To evaluation methodology of synthetic categories of quality of life. Economics and Mathematical Methods. 39(2): 33-53.
[4] Blinov, V.V. 2013. To a question about the content of ‘Quality of Life’ category. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Chapter: Economics and Management. 7(4): 172-175.
[5] Bobkov, V.N. 2009. Questions of the theory, research methodology, and evaluation of quality and standard of living of the population. Living standards of the population in Russian regions. No. 6: 3-15.
[6] Dagbaeva, S.D-N. 2011. Social technologies in the management of the quality of life. Bulletin of East Siberian State University of Technology and Management (ESSUTM). 3 (34): 31.
[7] Emelyanov, A.M., Isakin M.A., Isdkind E.A. 2010. Effectiveness evaluation of social projects on the basis of QOL indicators. Digest Finance Press. No. 10: 47-54.
[8] Fakhrutdinova, E.V. 2009. Population Quality of Life: Theoretical Aspect. Economics. No. 59: 130-133.
[9] Gavrilova, T.V. 2004. Study principles and methods of quality of life of the population. Technology of quality of life. 4(2): 1-11.
[10] Glushakova, O. 2013. Paradigm of public administration: ensuring the quality of life. Issues of management theory and practice. No. 11: 58-65.
[11] Goman, E.Yu. 2012. Brief overview of the QOL concepts. Actual issues of the humanities and natural sciences. No. 3: 70-74.
[12] Gubaidullina, N.K. 2014. European social quality theory and life quality theory. Journal of economics, law and sociology. No.1: 144-148.
[13] Juran, D. 2004. Quality in the history of civilization. Evolution, trends and prospects of quality management. In 3 volumes. M. Standards and Quality Press.
[14] Leontyeva, A.G., Khokhlov, A.G. 2009. Management of quality of life in the context of sustainable development of the region. Economy of the region. No.4: 70-74.
[15] Malyuga, S.V. 2010. Social management: nature, management and issues. Scientific Issues of Humanitarian Research. No. 7: 235-241.
[16] Martyshenko, S.N. 2014. Conceptual models of QOL management. Analytical review. Regional Economics and Management: electronic scientific journal. No. 2: 80-92.
[17] Martyshenko, S.N. 2014. Research of the processes that affect quality of life in the Primorye Territory. Basic Studies. No. 3: 555-559
[18] Motrich, E.L., Naiden, S.N. 2013. Standard of living of the population and potential of social field in the regions of the Russian Far East. Living standards of the population in Russian regions. No. 1: 18-25.
[19] Mstislavsky, P.S. 2002. Theory and methodology of the analysis of the quality of life. Living standards of the population in Russian regions. No. 2: 5-17.
[20] Mukhacheva, A.V. 2012. Quality of life of the population as a scientific category: theoretical approaches to the definition. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 4(1): 303-307.
[21] Myasnikov, A.A. 2011. Synergistic effects in the modern economy: Introduction to the issues. – M.: LENAND PRESS, 160 p.
[22] Nagimova, A.M. 2012. Theoretical approaches to the issue of the quality of life. Electronic Economic Bulletin of Tatarstan. No. 1: 355-361.
[23] Nugaev R.M., Nugaev, M.A. 2003. Quality of life in the works of the US sociologists. Sociological researches. No.6: 100-105.
[24] Prisyazhniy, M.Yu. 2011. Approaches to the definition of ‘Quality of life’. Actual issues of the humanities and natural sciences. No. 5: 283-295.
[25] Prisyazhniy, M.Yu. 2011. Concept of ‘Quality of Life’ in the allied concepts. Actual issues of the humanities and natural sciences. No.4: 201-208.
[26] Schlichter, A.A. 2008. Quality of life in countries with a market economy: concepts, measurement, evaluation Work abroad. No.1: 3-22.
[27] Shutilov, F.V. 2013. Evaluation methods of effectiveness and synergistic effect of clusters. Scientific Bulletin of the Southern Institute of Management. 2(2): 81-85.
[28] Spiridonov, S.P. 2010. Indicators of quality of life and methodology of their formation. Issues of modern science and practice. No. 10-12: 208-223. University n.a. V.I. Vernandsky.
[29] Vdovin, V.M., Surkov L.E., Nalbatov I.I. 2012. Management model of quality of life. Fundamental and applied researches of the economy cooperative sector. No. 3: 24-29.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.