Understanding of Genetic Information and RNAi Therapeutic Application in Medical Faculty Students in Northeast Sri Lanka and the Implications for Genetics Education
Abstract
This study examines students’ understanding of the normative connections between key concepts of genetics, and RNAi and underlying biological principles that are critical for an in-depth understanding of RNAi therapeutic application on Medical field. Using a structural questionnaire, we examine randomly selected Medical faculty students’ understanding of genetic relationships at Faculty of Medicine and Allied Sciences, University of Rajarata, Sri Lanka. A total of 80 Medical faculty students participated in this study and completed written questionnaire on genetics and RNAi therapeutic application. Findings from this study were there is a strong positive response on basic genetics studies in this content, but when it considers knowledge on RNAi and new technology based on RNAi therapeutic application is poorly understood. Almost all the students had a good knowledge on DNA but not the relationship between gene and DNA. Specifically, students were requested to demonstrate an integrated understanding of the RNAi therapeutic application, almost 96% of them unable to give an example for it, and also some students struggled to explain it. Outcome of this study is preliminary in nature; the results provide cause for concern over the status of genetics education in Sri Lanka need to uplift.
References
[2] Alozie, N., J. Eklund, A. Rogat and J. Krajcik (2010). "Genetics in the 21st century: The benefits & challenges of incorporating a project-based genetics unit in biology classrooms." The American Biology Teacher, 72(4): 225-230.
[3] Banet, E. and G. E. Ayuso (2003). "Teaching of biological inheritance and evolution of living beings in secondary school." International Journal of Science Education 25(3): 373-407.
[4] Brumby, M. N. (1984). "Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students." Science Education 68: 493–503.
[5] Chattopadhyay, A. (2005). "Understanding of Genetic Information in Higher Secondary Students in Northeast India and the Implications for Genetics Education." Cell Biology Education 4: 97-104.
[6] Davis, I. C. (1948). "Science in functional living." 32(3): 136-137.
[7] Dawson, V. and . Schibeci (2003). "Western Australian school students’ understanding of biotechnology." International Journal of Science Education 25: 57 – 69.
[8] Duncan, R.G. and B.J. Reiser (2007). "Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: Students’ understandings of molecular genetics." Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7): 655-674.
[9] Duncan, R.G., A.D. ogat and A. arden (2009). "A learning progression for deepening students’ understandings of modern genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,." Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6): 655 – 674.
[10] Hallden, O. (1988). "The evolution of the species: pupil perspectives and school perspectives." International Journal of Science Education 14: 541-552.
[11] Kindfield, A. . . (199 ). "Assessing understanding of biological processes: elucidating students’ models of meiosis." The American Biology Teacher 56: 367-371.
[12] Lewis, J. and U. Kattmann (2004). "Traits, genes, particles and information: re-visiting students’ understandings of genetics." International Journal of Science Education 26(2): 195-206.
[13] Lewis, J., J. Leach and C. Wood-Robinson (2000). "All in the genes?— oung people’s understanding of the nature of genes." Biological Education 34(2): 74-79.
[14] Longden, B. (1982). "Genetics—are their inherent learning difficulties?" Journal of Biological Education 16: 135-140.
[15] Marbach-Ad, . (2001). "Attempting to break the code in students’ comprehension of genetic concepts." Journal of Biological Education 35(4): 183-189.
[16] Orcajo, T. I. and M. M. Aznar (2005). "Solving problems in genetics II: Conceptual restructuring. International " Journal of Science Education, 27(12): 1495 – 1519.
[17] Shayer, M. (1974). "Conceptual demands in the Nuffield O-level biology course." Sch. Sci. Rev. 56: 381-388.
[18] Tuschi, T. (2002). "Expanding small RNA interference." Nature Biotechnology 20: 446-447.
[19] Venville, ., S. J. ribble and J. Donovan (200 ). "An exploration of young children’s understandings of genetics concepts from ontological and epistemological perspectives." Science Education 89: 614 – 633.
[20] Wood- obinson, ., J. Lewis and J. Leach (2000). " oung people’s understanding of the nature of genetic information in the cells of an organism." Journal of Biological Education 35(1): 29-36.
[21] Zohar, A. and . Nemet (2002). " ostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics" Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39: 35 – 62.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.