Can Schools Buy Success in College Football? Coach Compensation, Expenditures and Performance
Abstract
Using unique data of Football Bowl Subdivision college football games, we examine the determinants of coach compensation, football expenses and performance. We find that coach compensation is highly related to the coach’s past success. Additionally, coach pay is higher when the institution has a larger fan base and the program has achieved a higher profit in the previous year. Football expenses are likewise determined by institutional characteristics such as the fan base, past profitability and historical success. Results suggest that coach compensation has no measurable impact on performance. A coach’s past success may impact their salary but their salary has no significant impact on future success. Though, an additional, aspirational increase in spending of $1 million on the football program can improve the probability of winning any particular game by 3.5% to 7.0%. Thus, the budget of an administrator is a better predictor of future performance than the coach’s salary.
References
[2] Farmer, A. and Pecorino, P. 2010. Is the coach paid too much? Coaching salaries and the NCAA cartel. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 19: 841–862.
[3] Grant, R., Leadley, J., and Zygmont, Z. 2010. Just Win Baby? Determinants of NCAA Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) Coaching Compensation 2006-2008. (paper presented at the Southern Economic. Association Conference, Atlanta, United States, November 20–22, 2010).
[4] Grossman, G.M., and Levinsohn, J.A. 1989. Import Competition and the Stock Market Return to Capital. American Economic Review 79: 1065-1087.
[5] Herda, T.J., Ryan, E.D., DeFreitas, J.M., Costa, P.B., Walter, A.A., Hoge, K.M., Weir, J.P., Cramer, J.T. 2009. Can Recruiting Rankings Predict the Success of NCAA Division I Football Teams? An Examination of the Relationships among Rivals and Scouts Recruiting Rankings and Jeff Sagarin End-of-Season Ratings in Collegiate Football. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports 5: 1-11.
[6] Langlett, G. 2003. The Relationship between Recruiting and Team Performance in Division 1A College Football. Journal of Sports Economics 4: 240-245.
[7] Orszag, J. and Israel, M. 2009. The empirical effects of collegiate athletics: An update based on 2004-07 Data. Compass Lexecon Consulting. http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/DI_MC_BOD/DI_BOD/ 2009/April/04%20_Empirical_Effects.pdf (accessed October 27, 2012)
[8] Orszag, J. and Orszag, P. 2005. The Empirical Effects of Collegiate Athletics: An Update. Compass Lexecon Consulting http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/library/research/athletic_spending/2005/empirical_ effects_of_ collegiate_athletics_update.pdf (accessed October 27, 2012)
[9] Zimbalist, A. 2010. Dollar dilemmas during the downturn: A financial crossroads for college sports. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport 3: 111-124.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.